DBoston80
Undisputed #1
LightsOut said:saids the guy with randy mcmichael in his avator and sig.
..Exactly




LightsOut said:saids the guy with randy mcmichael in his avator and sig.
DBoston80 said:...ExactlyLightsOut said:saids the guy with randy mcmichael in his avator and sig:rofl3:
:rofl3: :rofl3:
![]()
![]()
Jimmy James said:You just said negative things about Randy McMichael...one of your beloved Dolphins.
Hypocrite.
:shakeno:
It's not the first time, either. I know what you have said about Marty Booker.
but Randy proves his worth to the dolphins on the field. Boston has not yet done so.DBoston80 said:Show me a qoute where I say anything negative about Randy...all I'm saying is it proves you got an agenda strictly for Boston..since Randy has had off the field problems aswell.................uhhhhhhhhh thank you:D
texasPHINSfan said:but Randy proves his worth to the dolphins on the field. Boston has not yet done so.
its the randy moss-ism... (and sometimes T.O.-ism).... bad behavior and attitude off the field can sometimes be overlooked by stellar on-field play.
Randy led us in receptions last year and was just behind the yardage leader. Although he has a penchant for hitting his wife, he produces for us.
Boston has the potential to achieve great #'s again, but he hasn't yet. as such he must earn that spot. Even booker had 640 yards last year. So why should booker lose his spot to a guy who had ZERO yards last year based on 34 yards in the 3rd quarter of preseason game #3?
DBoston80 said:Show me a qoute where I say anything negative about Randy...all I'm saying is it proves you got an agenda strictly for Boston..since Randy has had off the field problems aswell.................uhhhhhhhhh thank you:D
are you illiterate? read my last paragraph. Boston does NOT deserve the #2 position over Booker based on one quarter of play that involved 34 yards in receiving. I stated it pretty clearly there.DBoston80 said:ok...so whats your point??
JJ - don't waste your time... this guy is a homer to the n-th degree. his name, avatar, and sig should tell us enough.Jimmy James said:I quoted you already unless you're going to actually try to insult the board's intelligence by saying you didn't mean anything by what you wrote.
I have NEVER said I expect all of the Dolphins to be angels, and I have ALREADY said my peace about Randy here and other places. You don't like that based solely on Boston's medical issues and NOT his off-field behavior, I believe Boston to be capable of less than you do. You don't like that I stick up for the class act known at Marty Booker when you attack him. You're proving to be barely worth my attention. If that's the way you want it to be, so be it.
Jimmy James said:I quoted you already unless you're going to actually try to insult the board's intelligence by saying you didn't mean anything by what you wrote.
I have NEVER said I expect all of the Dolphins to be angels, and I have ALREADY said my peace about Randy here and other places. You don't like that based solely on Boston's medical issues and NOT his off-field behavior, I believe Boston to be capable of less than you do. You don't like that I stick up for the class act known at Marty Booker when you attack him. You're proving to be barely worth my attention. If that's the way you want it to be, so be it.
texasPHINSfan said:are you illiterate? read my last paragraph. Boston does NOT deserve the #2 position over Booker based on one quarter of play that involved 34 yards in receiving. I stated it pretty clearly there.
I would lose sleep.DBoston80 said:If you disappeared from this board I dont think many of us would lose sleep..sorry to burst your ego![]()
i never said you said that. i responded to you with my first paragraph (in the first post of yours i quoted), then i segweyed into my real point addressed to everyone else.DBoston80 said:..Are you illiterate????? Show me where I said Boston should be the #2..JACKAZZ![]()