Did You See Matt Moore

[Nawledge]

But how do u say the league is qb driven then use the seahawks? Lol, look man I agree with ya that Wilson's good and he contributes to their success. I mean I understand your point on qb driven in the sense that if you have an elite qb and with the rules u can put up some points but I still believe in great defenses contribute just as much as an elite qb to a teams success, especially come playoff time. The Seahawks are a really good well rounded team, that's all there is to it.

 

[Ilovemyfins4eva]

But how do u say the league is qb driven then use the seahawks? Lol, look man I agree with ya that Wilson's good and he contributes to their success. I mean I understand your point on qb driven in the sense that if you have an elite qb and with the rules u can put up some points but I still believe in great defenses contribute just as much as an elite qb to a teams success, especially come playoff time. The Seahawks are a really good well rounded team, that's all there is to it.

this point i am going to make has nothing to do with tanny or wilson, but just about elite defenses in the nfl.

there will never be another elite defense in the nfl. its impossible. with not being able to touch wrs, touch qbs, make any contact, its been taken out of the nfl.

can a defense be very good? yes. can they have an elite game? yes, but gone r the days of dominating defense like the 85 bears or 2000 ravens.

goodell took that away with his wimpy rules.

 

[DavePornstache]

Im glad we won, but it was a hollow victory. It was like winning employee of the month at a brothel: we still suck.

lol

 

[sm0kinfins]

i was happy.

as i said, ill take being wrong on a stinkin message board where i do not know what anyone looks like in person and who have no effect on my life, rather than being right and seeing the dolphins continue to suffer like i have the past 10 plus years.

that being said, i cant dismiss 35 prior games and just look at this 1 game because it was his best game of his career so far.

he needs to play 75 percent of what he played like today and we win many games this year.

no one is expecting him to play like he did today on a consistent basis, and he does not need to do so to win

Right, because this was the first good game he's had to date. :rolleyes2:

 

[Klenton66]

Did you all see Matt Moore. The pocket presence, the awareness, the finesse! Simply a treat to watch in this offensive display of dominance.

Chuck Norris was heard after the game saying "Matt Moore would whip Chuck Norris's ass!!"

Philbin didn't want Moore to throw the ball against the raiders, because Moore would have been just as effective at throwing the ball against them, even without the three years of coddling and first rep snaps that Tannehill has had.
Moore has shown a lot of class, after 3 years of preferential treatment, Tannehill should be able to play better than Moore. Usually, you can't watch Tannehill play and tell that he has had all of the extra reps. One game, against the last
place raiders, who have lost their last ten games, does not make Tannehill a great quarterback. I don't think Tannehill is better than Moore. Moore has not been given three years of first team reps, to be able to fairly compare him to Tannehill. Under Philbin, Moore won't get that chance. I would like Tannehill to bomb a few more games, so that we can get rid of Philbin, and get a real coach. That would be worth it too me. We had that chance sunday against the
last place raiders, Tannehill picked the wrong week to have his one out of 5 good games.

 

[Ilovemyfins4eva]

Right, because this was the first good game he's had to date. :rolleyes2:

wow, another dude who does not know how to read between the lines.

did i say it was his only good game of his career? no.

was it his best? prob.

the 35 games prior, i am not going to break down game by game, but if u want to, u can go ahead, because i am sure u will find the same thing i see.

its been avg.

yesterdays performance was like a top notch qb.

will he continue it in 2 weeks or revert back to the inaccurate guy?

i hope its not the latter

 

[sm0kinfins]

wow, another dude who does not know how to read between the lines.

did i say it was his only good game of his career? no.

was it his best? prob.

the 35 games prior, i am not going to break down game by game, but if u want to, u can go ahead, because i am sure u will find the same thing i see.

its been avg.

yesterdays performance was like a top notch qb.

will he continue it in 2 weeks or revert back to the inaccurate guy?

i hope its not the latter

No, you implied that it was the only good game of his career. I don't expect you to grasp something as complicated as 'perceptions' when you're too lazy to A) change your sig pic and B) add the couple more letters required to type the words 'your' and 'why'. Both your arguments and your grammar are those of a 14 year old girl.

Here's the grade school text version of my reply in case adult language is too much for you:

no u implied tht it was the only gd game of his career i dont xpect u 2 grasp something az complicated as 'perceptions' when ur 2 lzy 2 a) change ur sig pic and b) add the couple more letters required to type the words 'your' and 'why' both ur arguments and ur grammar are those of a 14 yr old grl

---------- Post added at 11:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:28 AM ----------

Philbin didn't want Moore to throw the ball against the raiders, because Moore would have been just as effective at throwing the ball against them, even without the three years of coddling and first rep snaps that Tannehill has had.
Moore has shown a lot of class, after 3 years of preferential treatment, Tannehill should be able to play better than Moore. Usually, you can't watch Tannehill play and tell that he has had all of the extra reps. One game, against the last
place raiders, who have lost their last ten games, does not make Tannehill a great quarterback. I don't think Tannehill is better than Moore. Moore has not been given three years of first team reps, to be able to fairly compare him to Tannehill. Under Philbin, Moore won't get that chance. I would like Tannehill to bomb a few more games, so that we can get rid of Philbin, and get a real coach. That would be worth it too me. We had that chance sunday against the
last place raiders, Tannehill picked the wrong week to have his one out of 5 good games.

Spoken like a true fan :tubes:

 

[Ilovemyfins4eva]

No, you implied that it was the only good game of his career. I don't expect you to grasp something as complicated as 'perceptions' when you're too lazy to A) change your sig pic and B) add the couple more letters required to type the words 'your' and 'why'. Both your arguments and your grammar are those of a 14 year old girl.

Here's the grade school text version of my reply in case adult language is too much for you:

no u implied tht it was the only gd game of his career i dont xpect u 2 grasp something az complicated as 'perceptions' when ur 2 lzy 2 a) change ur sig pic and b) add the couple more letters required to type the words 'your' and 'why' both ur arguments and ur grammar are those of a 14 yr old grl

---------- Post added at 11:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:28 AM ----------



Spoken like a true fan :tubes:

yes. sorry grammar police, i am truly sorry u feel that way about my posts, because i have been waiting to tell u, when reading your brilliant posts, i have always felt like i was reading a harvard grads posts.

just because i totally disagree with ur point of views, does not mean my point is any more invalid than yours

 

[sm0kinfins]

yes. sorry grammar police, i am truly sorry u feel that way about my posts, because i have been waiting to tell u, when reading your brilliant posts, i have always felt like i was reading a harvard grads posts.

just because i totally disagree with ur point of views, does not mean my point is any more invalid than yours

Thanks! While not quite Ivy League, I'm quite proud that my education shows in my posts. It's easy to blame a lack of education on pure laziness although; I'm not sure why anyone would be proud of either. :idk:

 

[Ilovemyfins4eva]

Thanks! While not quite Ivy League, I'm quite proud that my education shows in my posts. It's easy to blame a lack of education on pure laziness although; I'm not sure why anyone would be proud of either. :idk:

and just to get back to my point when i said i couldnt dismiss the prior 35 games, and u came to the assumption that i was stating that he had 0 good games until then, is it so hard to read between the lines?

he played great vs oakland, if he played 75 percent as well as he did vs oak, we r a top team, and we easily win the division this year.

but what i was trying to say about the prior 35 games was that he had been nothing more than avg, is that false? im not talking about a game here and there, i am talking about the overall grade.

 

[sm0kinfins]

and just to get back to my point when i said i couldnt dismiss the prior 35 games, and u came to the assumption that i was stating that he had 0 good games until then, is it so hard to read between the lines?

he played great vs oakland, if he played 75 percent as well as he did vs oak, we r a top team, and we easily win the division this year.

but what i was trying to say about the prior 35 games was that he had been nothing more than avg, is that false? im not talking about a game here and there, i am talking about the overall grade.

Average is fair. He's had a couple of great games and a couple of crap games. On the whole though, he's average. That goes for the entire team though. If he can get that kind of protection, our receivers manage to actually catch some of the gimme's like that did yesterday and our OC plans to his QB's strengths as he did yesterday, we're playoff bound. I would not refute that claim.