Did You See Matt Moore | Page 6 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Did You See Matt Moore

I like how you say it's a quarterback driven league where teams are no longer carried by a strong defense and run game then u use the Seahawks as an example...that's just ****ing laughable
 
I want to know why Matt Moore was cracknig up on the field. Like he was telling jokes in the huddle or something.
 
Nawledge said:
Oh so marshawn lynch is a slouch
Click to expand...

dude, lynch was on the seahawks for a few years before wilson was there?

what was there record during those seasons?

lynch was on the bills prior to the seahawks, what was the bills record during those years?

answer, not good. y? no qb whatsoever.

obviously a good run game helps, but the qb is what puts teams over the top in todays game

---------- Post added at 09:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 AM ----------
Nawledge said:
Lol russell Wilson had 2 more tds and 600 less yards than Tannehill last year so good point bro
Click to expand...

yes, because stats tell 100 percent of the story.

only dolphin fans think tannehill is close to wilson right now.

fortunately u r on a dolphin forum, so u can make that point and many ppl will agree with u
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
dude, lynch was on the seahawks for a few years before wilson was there?

what was there record during those seasons?

lynch was on the bills prior to the seahawks, what was the bills record during those years?

answer, not good. y? no qb whatsoever.

obviously a good run game helps, but the qb is what puts teams over the top in todays game
Click to expand...

Are you referring to the team that beat the defending Super Bowl Champion New Orleans Saints in the playoffs?
 
The Goat said:
Are you referring to the team that beat the defending Super Bowl Champion New Orleans Saints in the playoffs?
Click to expand...

Won the division and made it to the second round of the Playoffs...
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
dude, lynch was on the seahawks for a few years before wilson was there?

what was there record during those seasons?

lynch was on the bills prior to the seahawks, what was the bills record during those years?

answer, not good. y? no qb whatsoever.

obviously a good run game helps, but the qb is what puts teams over the top in todays game

---------- Post added at 09:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 AM ----------



yes, because stats tell 100 percent of the story.

only dolphin fans think tannehill is close to wilson right now.

fortunately u r on a dolphin forum, so u can make that point and many ppl will agree with u
Click to expand...

I'm not comparing Tannehill and Wilson just proving to u the Seahawks aren't a quarterback driven team....they beat one of the best quarterbacks of all Tim in the super bowl and it was because of defense
 
Nawledge said:
Lol russell Wilson had 2 more tds and 600 less yards than Tannehill last year so good point bro
Click to expand...
as i mentioned, i dont give a **** about stats except for wins and losses, because i can see with my eyes that wilson is much better as of now than tannehill, but when ur going to mention this to use as ur side of the argument, at least mention how tannehill had 588 attempts while wilson had 407
 
Do you think the jets made 2 afc championship games because of sanchez???????...

NO! IT WAS A STRONG RUN GAME AND DEFENSE.


SO...as much as u wanna preach about qb driven league it's not true. If it was Tom Brady wouldn't have lost to the giants twice in the super bowl.

---------- Post added at 10:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 AM ----------
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
as i mentioned, i dont give a **** about stats except for wins and losses, because i can see with my eyes that wilson is much better as of now than tannehill, but when ur going to mention this to use as ur side of the argument, at least mention how tannehill had 588 attempts while wilson had 407
Click to expand...

So you make my point for,me, thank you...Seahawks are not qb driven
 
Peyton manning had 450 COMPLETIONS while Wilson had 407 ATTEMPTS.....

still think the Seahawks are qb driven???

Jeez dude, u even know what your talking about at all?
 
Nawledge said:
Do you think the jets made 2 afc championship games because of sanchez???????...

NO! IT WAS A STRONG RUN GAME AND DEFENSE.


SO...as much as u wanna preach about qb driven league it's not true. If it was Tom Brady wouldn't have lost to the giants twice in the super bowl.

---------- Post added at 10:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 AM ----------



So you make my point for,me, thank you...Seahawks are not qb driven
Click to expand...
r they qb driven like the colt manning teams or bronco teams?

ur right if thats ur comparison, the seahawks do not need wilson to be as good as peyton or luck or rodgers to win.

However, if u can not see that wilson is a good qb and that he has been a big factor in the seahawks success, ur delusional.

2012, wilson is drafted, seahawks go 11-5 and lose in divisional round, and then next year 13-3 and win superbowl.

please stop this crap, the dolphins since dan the man retired have been mediocre to below avg at best, with the exception of 2008, which was a false hope season.

y? lack of qb play has been a major factor. if u cant see that, lets just stop arguing because we will not get anywhere.
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
r they qb driven like the colt manning teams or bronco teams?

ur right if thats ur comparison, the seahawks do not need wilson to be as good as peyton or luck or rodgers to win.

However, if u can not see that wilson is a good qb and that he has been a big factor in the seahawks success, ur delusional.

2012, wilson is drafted, seahawks go 11-5 and lose in divisional round, and then next year 13-3 and win superbowl.

please stop this crap, the dolphins since dan the man retired have been mediocre to below avg at best, with the exception of 2008, which was a false hope season.

y? lack of qb play has been a major factor. if u cant see that, lets just stop arguing because we will not get anywhere.
Click to expand...

I already said in the other thread I think Wilson is good but you can't disregard the run games success and the strong defense that contributes o that win loss record....Wilson doesn't carry that team, he makes some plays and doesn't make a whole lot of mistakes but Wilson doesn't light it up.
 
Nawledge said:
I already said in the other thread I think Wilson is good but you can't disregard the run games success and the strong defense that contributes o that win loss record....Wilson doesn't carry that team, he makes some plays and doesn't make a whole lot of mistakes but Wilson doesn't light it up.
Click to expand...

u dont need to be ****ing throw for 350 yds a game and 3 tds to be a good qb.

wilson will never put up rodgers, manning, or brees stats, but he is a winner.

u keep bringing up these absurd pts, yet u cant answer my one question.

why did the bills suck with lynch, and why did the seahawks suck with lynch and that defense before wilson got there? ( and plenty of the guys on the defense were there before wilson)

u dont need to be manning or luck, but wilson is very good.

if tannehill played like wilson, no one would complain
 
I was happy Moore didn't put it on the turf after the snap from Center - I was sweating just watching
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
i was happy.

as i said, ill take being wrong on a stinkin message board where i do not know what anyone looks like in person and who have no effect on my life, rather than being right and seeing the dolphins continue to suffer like i have the past 10 plus years.

that being said, i cant dismiss 35 prior games and just look at this 1 game because it was his best game of his career so far.

he needs to play 75 percent of what he played like today and we win many games this year.

no one is expecting him to play like he did today on a consistent basis, and he does not need to do so to win
Click to expand...

1) Wasn't the best game of his career
2) Completely absurd to imply that every single game of the previous 35 was bad (very far from fact)

exaggeration removes every ounce of credibility to your posts.

oh.. and 3) quit using the same "I'm too lazy" crap to explain why you still have your profile plastered with RT. You weren't too lazy to put it up....so Man up and take it down or admit you know he isn't as bad as you say and you're conforming to get a little attention.
 
Sarnics13 said:
1) Wasn't the best game of his career
2) Completely absurd to imply that every single game of the previous 35 was bad (very far from fact)

exaggeration removes every ounce of credibility to your posts.

oh.. and 3) quit using the same "I'm too lazy" crap to explain why you still have your profile plastered with RT. You weren't too lazy to put it up....so Man up and take it down or admit you know he isn't as bad as you say and you're conforming to get a little attention.
Click to expand...


bold part 1.

when saying previous 35 games, i am not breaking down game by game, i am looking at the big picture. did i ****ing say every one of those games he was bad? please dont put words in my mouth.

bold 2, i dont need u telling me what to do with my sig and avatar. ill do what i want with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom