Did You See Matt Moore | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Did You See Matt Moore

And you probably one of those guys that think Matt Moore is better than Tannehill LMAO. Typical not happy with a team win because Tanne had a good game.

no that was u back in 2011 when moore started and won .

and dont ****ing put words in my mouth, when the **** did i say i wasnt happy with the win? do u honestly think i give a **** if i end up being wrong on message board where i dont know anyone and never will know anyone?

ive been a dolphin fan way before tannehill, i will be one long after he is gone from this team, i want to win.

1 ****ing good game vs oakland does not make him all the sudden the future. u know the same way back in 2011 when according to u '' moore only beats bad teams'', well tannehill today for the first ****ing time in his career beat a bad team with ease. con ****ing grats, its about ****ing time, if only he did that last year we would have made the playoffs.

u see, i can give credit when credits due unlike u, im not one who always blames the o line when we lose, but when we win and the qb does well cant give him credit.

anyone who understands football, knows that the offense goes as the qb goes. its not a surprise that at 2-2, the 2 games we won the qb played decent in week 1 and very well today, and the 2 games we lost he played like dog ****, not the o line, tannehill.

if tannehill played 75 percent of how he played today on a consistent basis, he will be here for a long time and the fins will win many games.

if he goes back in 2 weeks and ****s the bed vs gb, which he has had a tendency of doing following a good game, we r in no better shape than we were 2 weeks ago.

today was a very good game, follow it up with more good games, dont ****ing fall back into the same mediocre qb

the only reason ppl like myself and wv and others have been calling for moore is because tannehill has really done nothing in 35 games that makes u say '' wow this guy is special'', etc.

u want to tell me he is better than moore, im not getting into another argument about that because u know where i stand and i know where u stand, but if tannehill had been playing really well throughout his career, like a luck or wilson, or even foles in his short time as eagles qb, no one would be saying a word about matt moore, because tannehill would be the guy hands down, and no one would even consider having to make a change.
 
why you so mad bro? you said you were happy we won?
i am mad when i get accused of things i never said. i am happy we won. dont worry, im not writing this with my blood pressure going up and wanting to kill someone, lol.

also, its fine to be happy, but its funny these same guys who defend tannehill r only here when we win, never when we lose ( well at least most of them, some do show up in both scenarios)

also, i can give credit when credits due, all i need to see now is him follow this up the next couple of weeks and we will have something.

build on these performances
 
no that was u back in 2011 when moore started and won .

and dont ****ing put words in my mouth, when the **** did i say i wasnt happy with the win? do u honestly think i give a **** if i end up being wrong on message board where i dont know anyone and never will know anyone?

ive been a dolphin fan way before tannehill, i will be one long after he is gone from this team, i want to win.

1 ****ing good game vs oakland does not make him all the sudden the future. u know the same way back in 2011 when according to u '' moore only beats bad teams'', well tannehill today for the first ****ing time in his career beat a bad team with ease. con ****ing grats, its about ****ing time, if only he did that last year we would have made the playoffs.

u see, i can give credit when credits due unlike u, im not one who always blames the o line when we lose, but when we win and the qb does well cant give him credit.

anyone who understands football, knows that the offense goes as the qb goes. its not a surprise that at 2-2, the 2 games we won the qb played decent in week 1 and very well today, and the 2 games we lost he played like dog ****, not the o line, tannehill.

if tannehill played 75 percent of how he played today on a consistent basis, he will be here for a long time and the fins will win many games.

if he goes back in 2 weeks and ****s the bed vs gb, which he has had a tendency of doing following a good game, we r in no better shape than we were 2 weeks ago.

today was a very good game, follow it up with more good games, dont ****ing fall back into the same mediocre qb

the only reason ppl like myself and wv and others have been calling for moore is because tannehill has really done nothing in 35 games that makes u say '' wow this guy is special'', etc.

u want to tell me he is better than moore, im not getting into another argument about that because u know where i stand and i know where u stand, but if tannehill had been playing really well throughout his career, like a luck or wilson, or even foles in his short time as eagles qb, no one would be saying a word about matt moore, because tannehill would be the guy hands down, and no one would even consider having to make a change.

You mean back when he was beating sub-par teams and couldn't lead a comeback to save his life and folded like a lawn chair in the 4th quarter?....or are you talking when he came in "like a boss" against Buffalo last year? I am just curious?
 
If any qb plays like this every week the team he was on would be undefeated.

He can't play like this every week, he just needs to play better
 
You mean back when he was beating sub-par teams and couldn't lead a comeback to save his life and folded like a lawn chair in the 4th quarter?....or are you talking when he came in "like a boss" against Buffalo last year? I am just curious?

lol, he didnt need to comeback vs those poor teams, because we had the game in the ****ing bag long before it was over, unlike with tannehill where games vs garbage teams with the exception of today we either lose or need to pull a miracle to win.

as to last year vs buffalo, it truly shows how much hate u have for moore and like anyone not named moore.

here we r talking about a game last year, in which u know, the future awesome 1st round qb we drafted tannehill starts in buffalo and plays like absolute garbage through 3 quarters, and cost us a playoff ****ing berth because he couldnt even ****ing win the next week vs the jets at home, yet all u like to focus on from that bills game where we were down 19-0 i believe and had 50 total yds of offense, is our backup qb, who in 1 play had just half as many yds as tannehill had the entire game until that point.


but ya, lets not focus on the reason we were out of the playoffs last year, lets focus on the backup qb who played 1 quarter in a game we were already done for in buffalo.

wow u r one smart dude who clearly understands football.

then again, u r the same guy who was a big chad henne fan, so what else would i ****ing expect from u. u just love bad qbs.
 
Some people are so transparent on here it's not even funny. To be honest, I wouldn't care if Wake was the QB.....I would pull for him and this team. The fakes in here are the ones who come in ya we won, Tanne had a good game but but but but. You know it helps when the receivers don't drop the ball and you don't have someone in your face or hands constantly in the throwing windows.....just saying. You know who you are too and why a lot of people find this thread funny and why some automatically respond defensively.
 
its so funny how ****y the tannehill lovers r today.

u r prob one of those ppl who believe tannehill is better than ryan, lol.

I'm curious. Who is that in your avatar & signature? There is irony for you.

too lazy

i cant, i am a 14 year old girl, i will post like someone my age should

I would have said a 9 yo w/ a defective keyboard. Seriously (?), if you are 14 yo girl; shouldn't you be obsessing about boy bands while watching those god awful twilight movies?

Hey, lay off Matt Moore....he has just as many Superbowl rings as Matt Ryan!

& Tony Romo.

Nobody but nobody runs the victory formation like Matt Moore.
 
lol, he didnt need to comeback vs those poor teams, because we had the game in the ****ing bag long before it was over, unlike with tannehill where games vs garbage teams with the exception of today we either lose or need to pull a miracle to win.

as to last year vs buffalo, it truly shows how much hate u have for moore and like anyone not named moore.

here we r talking about a game last year, in which u know, the future awesome 1st round qb we drafted tannehill starts in buffalo and plays like absolute garbage through 3 quarters, and cost us a playoff ****ing berth because he couldnt even ****ing win the next week vs the jets at home, yet all u like to focus on from that bills game where we were down 19-0 i believe and had 50 total yds of offense, is our backup qb, who in 1 play had just half as many yds as tannehill had the entire game until that point.


but ya, lets not focus on the reason we were out of the playoffs last year, lets focus on the backup qb who played 1 quarter in a game we were already done for in buffalo.

wow u r one smart dude who clearly understands football.

then again, u r the same guy who was a big chad henne fan, so what else would i ****ing expect from u. u just love bad qbs.

Actually I dunno why everyone but me it seems doesn't challenge this BS. IMO, clinching the playoffs should not have come down to being assaulted by Buffalo abetted by the 28-32nd best OL in a game that the week before Brady himself proved, he'd not have walked away from, and certainly not victorious. Considering that OL, no blocking TEs, one of the few red zone threats going down in TC and the other midseason, the 26th ranked running game, a rookie kicker who developed the yips, the internal and unnecessary disruptions created by a mommy's boy, and the 2nd coming of Dan Henning calling ponderous plays, IMO, Tannehill over-achieved in even getting them up to the 15 th game with the postseason in sight, beating 4 playoff bound teams. Although he certainly had his highs like NE and Pittsburgh and lows like game 17, It's not like he spent the whole season doing a Melty Ice playoff second half imitation.

 
BTW, putting words in your mouth? HAHA pot calling the kettle black buddy. I have always said that if Moore was the QB I would fully support and hope I am wrong. However, I know what I have seen in Matt Moore and he IS NOT better than Tannehill who has lead comebacks against good teams several times and while not playing perfect by any stretch has does not make the Matt Moore types of mistakes and turnovers. If Matt Moore came in and played a game like Tanne did today, I would say hell ya....KEEP IT UP!
 
BTW, putting words in your mouth? HAHA pot calling the kettle black buddy. I have always said that if Moore was the QB I would fully support and hope I am wrong. However, I know what I have seen in Matt Moore and he IS NOT better than Tannehill who has lead comebacks against good teams several times and while not playing perfect by any stretch has does not make the Matt Moore types of mistakes and turnovers. If Matt Moore came in and played a game like Tanne did today, I would say hell ya....KEEP IT UP!

can u please give me a list of these '' great comebacks'' we have had under tannehill vs elite teams, because i i seriously do not recall them on a consistent basis like u make it seem?

also, someone was saying how tannehill can beat playoff teams and moore couldnt, i did the research and tannehill in 14 games vs playoff teams from those year, he has a record of 6-8 and many ugly losses.

now that would be ok if he can beat the bad teams, but unfortunately he can not.
 
can u please give me a list of these '' great comebacks'' we have had under tannehill vs elite teams, because i i seriously do not recall them on a consistent basis like u make it seem?

also, someone was saying how tannehill can beat playoff teams and moore couldnt, i did the research and tannehill in 14 games vs playoff teams from those year, he has a record of 6-8 and many ugly losses.

now that would be ok if he can beat the bad teams, but unfortunately he can not.

5 come back wins in just over 2 years....3 of those 5 wins against teams that made the playoffs. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/comeback.cgi?player=TannRy00

BTW Moore has 4 in his entire career and folded like a lawn chair in the 4th Quarter when he was a starter for us.
 
Tannehill like a boss :up:

Lots of credit to Lazor who called an outstanding game and played to our QB's strength (short and intermediate passes)
Ryan was very accurate and the runs were a nice bonus.
I'll leave the rest to Hayden and Hoops.
 
Did you all see Matt Moore. The pocket presence, the awareness, the finesse! Simply a treat to watch in this offensive display of dominance.

Chuck Norris was heard after the game saying "Matt Moore would whip Chuck Norris's ass!!"

If Moore has to come in and play this yr me thinks you will be one of those fans who roots against his success smh
 
Back
Top Bottom