I saw that you guys were talking about our offseason and from what people were saying it was humorous, but I actually think you guys make some good points both for and against Bills possible success. The one thing that confuses me, though, are the numerous comments about Buffalo's "bad coaching staff" or Gailey being a bad HC. Can someone explain the logic in this?
From what I see, Gailey started us off 5-2, with the only 2 losses being against playoff teams (SB champion NYG and Cincy), by THREE points each, on the road. Then, we lost half of our starters, and Fitz played with broken ribs. We still beat another playoff team (Denver). I think this, combined with Gailey's coaching success with an aging Cowboys team (who were 6-10 the season before Gailey took over, then 5-11 the season after being fired), shows that Gailey is at the very least a decent coach, but I would argue very good to great.
Thoughts?
From what I see, Gailey started us off 5-2, with the only 2 losses being against playoff teams (SB champion NYG and Cincy), by THREE points each, on the road. Then, we lost half of our starters, and Fitz played with broken ribs. We still beat another playoff team (Denver). I think this, combined with Gailey's coaching success with an aging Cowboys team (who were 6-10 the season before Gailey took over, then 5-11 the season after being fired), shows that Gailey is at the very least a decent coach, but I would argue very good to great.
Thoughts?