Kiper got five picks correct out of 32 in the first round last year; I'm not sure that's the eye you want to use. To be fair, one of those correct picks WAS Miami.
Dolphins Already Very Active
- Thread starter elite14eva
- Start date
Kiper got five picks correct out of 32 in the first round last year; I'm not sure that's the eye you want to use. To be fair, one of those correct picks WAS Miami.
hoops
Tua time!
They should be proactive/aggressive and not just the draft.
it’s time to nut up
big next damn 7 days for Miami
it’s time to nut up
big next damn 7 days for Miami
Last edited:
The Lions have literally stated they're open to trading the pick.
The link is in my previous sentence.
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2004
- Messages
- 5,939
- Reaction score
- 11,113
Cool story. Can you give me the lotto numbers while you’re using that third eye of yours? Where have I herd that before?
Locke
They looked like strong hands.
Your obsession with me is cute. I hope you know the only time I even remember you exist is when you stalk me here.
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2016
- Messages
- 3,353
- Reaction score
- 5,712
No it's not, Locke. Come on. If the taking at 3 comes with a price, it is absolutely not.
If you're saying all things being equal, I agree. A player worth taking at 5 is worth taking just a few spots ahead.
The risk is not the same if you involve the trading of possibly 3 first round picks to move up 2 spots for a player coming off of major surgery. How can you possibly say the risk is the same?
Locke
They looked like strong hands.
Yes, it is. You may undervalue the QB position, but the rest of us do not. Where are you getting this 3 first round pick nonsense? Ignore hoops. He’s running around with his hair on fire over nothing.
Kamelion4291
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2017
- Messages
- 5,306
- Reaction score
- 9,236
So if we had the 3rd overall pick instead of the 5th, it wouldn't be worth taking Tua at 3 and we should instead trade down because the opportunity cost of the extra picks we'd gain would be more worth it?
This logic makes zero sense.
Nothing to do with @hoops. Your premise is flawed from the standpoint of logic, IMO.
Locke
They looked like strong hands.
Please, go ahead and explain the flaw.
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2016
- Messages
- 3,353
- Reaction score
- 5,712
Well, as of today, my money is on Tua falling to 5. After the combine- possible new story.
By your manner of reasoning, there is no difference in spending 1 pick, or 10 picks. I realize I'm taking it to an extreme. Would you give up 10 picks? If not, then you have to admit that at some point, the risk becomes too much for the required investment.
Now it is just a matter of where the individual draws the line, and that is "opinion".
Do you see what I'm getting at?
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2016
- Messages
- 3,353
- Reaction score
- 5,712
Why throw accusations? I don't undervalue the QB. I undervalue the I Love You Tua zealots opinion because he was still going at 2 even while the surgery was taking place.
The zealots have lost all credibility. They won't even acknowledge a history of injuries. If that's where you stand, we can end this convo right now. I'm not debating blind ignorance.
Locke
They looked like strong hands.
I never said that. The assumption is fair value on the trade up. If you need to stretch your argument to ridiculous extremes, you’ve conceded your point isn’t that strong.
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2016
- Messages
- 3,353
- Reaction score
- 5,712
The above logic makes zero sense. The taking at Tua at 3 doesn't cost you a draft in trade.
People will just spout anything out their a$$ regarding Tua. If you're a zealot. See my prior post.
The reasonable mind can entertain 2 opposing thoughts at the same time and still have the ability to function.
Having the zealots even consider the opposing thought on Tua makes them start poking away at the key board like chimps trying to figure out a CPU.