Dolphins frontrunners for Steelers WR Mike Wallace | Page 8 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Dolphins frontrunners for Steelers WR Mike Wallace

This reminds me of the Peyton Manning speculation when all of you thought Miami was the frontrunner to land Manning. Just because an NFL player might be come available, doesn't mean he is going to wind up in Miami. :sleep:
 
I would give them a first round pick. Ireland should be in trade talks no matter what.

A GM would need to be f'n HIGH to give a 1st round for Wallace :crazy:

First round pick for a WR? He's not worth that much!

FOURTH round pick, maybe a 3rd and 5th.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If this Elite WR does become available it would be foolish to pass him up, he's young and coming into the start of his greatest production years. The biggest need on this team is and will continue to be talent at the wr position, next years draft discussion will be about the WR we need to take in the 1st, so fix it now and trade for Wallace. If he can be had for a 2nd it should be now!
 
You make your own reality and you've clearly made yours.


Back on topic. Matt Moore and David Garrard are garbage. We're never going to have a "dynamic offense" with that type of trash throwing to the receivers. Dynamic offenses in this league don't have one single pass catcher worth a damn either, like we would if we got Wallace. They all have several. Sorry, but adding one WR to an offense heavily devoid of talent isn't turning this into a "dynamic offense." It might turn it from horrific to below average.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back on topic. Matt Moore and David Garrard are garbage. We're never going to have a "dynamic offense" with that type of trash throwing to the receivers. Dynamic offenses in this league don't have one single pass catcher worth a damn either, like we would if we got Wallace. They all have several. Sorry, but adding one WR to an offense heavily devoid of talent isn't turning this into a "dynamic offense." It might turn it from horrific to below average.

You're not thinking logically. MOORE was the 12th Rated QB in the League last year, despite (1) the lingering stench of PARCELLSBALL, (2) an unready HC, and (3) COLUMBO-CAREY protecting (ha!) his right side. That means that there were 20 starting NFL QBs who were worse than MOORE. So flush all the media cliches and **** down the toilet, already. As to GARRARD, he's 34, and coming off of back surgery. Once upon a time, he was decent...not topshelf, but decent. Now? I don't know, but I sure wouldn't count on it. Still, he's NOT garbage.

If MIAMI's OL can keep its QB standing up, this CAN very definitely be a high octane "O".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i'm just wondering if the steelers would take a 2nd rounder for him...but man you bring him in this means they are giving up on gates....and i think that's a mistake at this point

We gots the 2013 3rd rounder from the BM trade. That would be a good value.
 
First round pick for a WR? He's not worth that much!

FOURTH round pick, maybe a 3rd and 5th.

No. He's a game changer and if we're going to draft a WR in the first round next (hopefully), I'd rather get a proven young player.

This conversation is pointless anyways though because we may not have to give up a first round pick.
 
No. He's a game changer and if we're going to draft a WR in the first round next (hopefully), I'd rather get a proven young player.

This conversation is pointless anyways though because we may not have to give up a first round pick.
Yo i love your sig lmao!
 
You're not thinking logically. MOORE was the 12th Rated QB in the League last year, despite (1) the lingering stench of PARCELLSBALL, (2) an unready HC, and (3) COLUMBO-CAREY protecting (ha!) his right side. That means that there were 20 starting NFL QBs who were worse than MOORE. So flush all the media cliches and **** down the toilet, already. As to GARRARD, he's 34, and coming off of back surgery. Once upon a time, he was decent...not topshelf, but decent. Now? I don't know, but I sure wouldn't count on it. Still, he's NOT garbage.

If MIAMI's OL can keep its QB standing up, this CAN very definitely be a high octane "O".

I don't care what type of fluky season Moore had against bad defenses coming in as a backup. He's the definition of mediocre. He's already sucked once as a full time starter and it will happen again. But of course, he's most likely not even going to be the starter. Garrard has always been mediocre. A couple of decent seasons sure. Garbage... Mediocre... It's all the same to me pertaining to the Quarterback position. If you have either, you simply don't stand a chance to win a Superbowl in today's NFL. If it was up to me, I'd start Tannehill regardless of whether he's ready or not. Sitting rookie Qb's on the bench is an overrated concept, especially in today's NFL.
 
As far as compensation goes, I'd be willing to offer a conditional 1st. Too much of a chance to finish with a top 5 pick to offer up a straight 1st imo.
 
As far as compensation goes, I'd be willing to offer a conditional 1st. Too much of a chance to finish with a top 5 pick to offer up a straight 1st imo.

I don't see us finishing in the top 5. If I was Ireland and I'd thought we'd be in the top 5 then I'd definitely wouldn't trade that pick away. However, I think we'll be in that average 6-8 win area so I think Wallace is worth a mid first round pick.
 
I don't see us finishing in the top 5. If I was Ireland and I'd thought we'd be in the top 5 then I'd definitely wouldn't trade that pick away. However, I think we'll be in that average 6-8 win area so I think Wallace is worth a mid first round pick.

With our schedule, yet another mediocre season is more likely, but top 5 is certainly possible with our QB options. I don't think I'd want to take that chance. A conditional pick where they get a 1st if we finish better than .500 or something like that would be preferred.
 
If in fact this did happen.....we would instantly become a dynamic offense!
True. Miami could have Mike Wallace, Reggie Bush and Lamar Miller on the field together in certain packages. That's a lot of speed and big play ability on the offense.
 
As far as compensation goes, I'd be willing to offer a conditional 1st. Too much of a chance to finish with a top 5 pick to offer up a straight 1st imo.

We are not finishing with a top five pick. Team has talent whether you admit it or not. Yes we need a help at
Receiver and decent QB play. We will see. Not all of us have a defeatist attitude.
 
Back
Top Bottom