Casas9425
Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 5,939
- Reaction score
- 4,156
Yuck!Well, that was fun while it lasted. Now back to Brian Hartline and Legedu Naanee as your primary recievers.
Yuck!Well, that was fun while it lasted. Now back to Brian Hartline and Legedu Naanee as your primary recievers.
There is talk that he could be had for as little as a 4th round pick because of is contract demands. Still though, I can't see the Steelers trading him.
Glad to see you posting again Robi. :up:
imo if dallas did get in on this thenthey would have to cut austin or maybe even dez because they dont have the money to pay all of those recivers , they also have a cap as we do so if they do go after wallace and get him they are going to loose a good wr that we still might be in the running for.but dallas dont have any cap left either we have if i looked at it right , we have just as much as dallas has plus next year we are going to be in a whole lot better possion than dallas prob double the cap space dallas will have next year.i would poop myself in excitment, but my money is on dallas
I agree with Cedar, no to Big Jake and a 4th for Wallace.
How about WALLACE and a 2013 1st and 2nd for JAKE? That sounds more fair.
imo they might as well trade wallace because after they rubbed the brown contract in wallaces face im sure they burnt the bridge.Kevin Colbert (Pittsburgh's GM) came out and said Wallace will NOT be traded. So this thread is moot.
And to answer your question, Steelers couldn't afford Big Jake anyways.
I want nothing to do with Mike Wallace. Let him get paid elsewhere. I do not want to trade picks for another disgruntled receiver again. BUILD THROUGH THE DRAFT AND FILL IN FA VETERANS. Low Risk, High Reward.