Would have made more sense to drop lobato.
Would have made more sense to drop lobato.
I'm pretty sure there was a poster on this forum proclaiming Devlin as our next franchise QB, and that he'd unseat Tannehill. I'm pretty sure he was serious, considering he kept this up for like a year.
I'm kind of disappointed in that we devoted like 3 seasons into developing this guy. I think a lot of fans, myself included, thought he was going to take the next step and replace Matt Moore as the backup, and actually be.... an upgrade.... as our 2nd stringer. I didn't find him arrogant, I thought he had a good QB persona and I liked his skillset. I understand we have a new OC, so maybe he doesn't translate for Lazor, but it kind of sucks we wasted a roster spot and maybe could have held onto other developmental prospects.
In addition, Baltimore makes sense since He was on Deleware's roster with Flacco if memory serves correct. Probably gave him a recommendation.
Ok now I might buy into the keep two quarterbacks on the 53 man roster theory. Put Lobato or someone else on the practice squad and have Quinn on speed dial.
Also remember that just because you're released doesn't mean you should clean out your locker. Just ask Brock Jensen and Cameron Marshall, you never know when a team might call you back in.
I think those are different examples. IF we cut Devlin I doubt we bring him back