Lilseb93
This Is My House
I honestly see no point in keeping 2 FB's on a roster. Clay or another player will need to take Hilliards spot on ST's
I like Hilliard. I think he's proven his worth. I just don't see him going anywhere.
I honestly see no point in keeping 2 FB's on a roster. Clay or another player will need to take Hilliards spot on ST's
We needed a 3rd string running back and Sheets/Hilliard/Grigsby were not cutting it. If LJ is half the player he used to be, how can you hate this signing from a depth standpoint? You have Bush and Thomas carrying the load, and then you sprinkle in LJ from time to time.
Plus as a Penn State fan, I love seeing the continued growth of Nittany Lions on the team. Worst case scenario is he gets cut after the final preaseason game.
I Do not understand this regime at all. This move absolutely makes no sense to me. Larry Johnson is an aging, washed up, rusty RB. He's 31 and has averaged just 3.22 yards per carry on his last 361 NFL carries. We were also looking at Clinton Tortis?
Why not just resign Ricky or Ronnie (both > Johnson), instead of scraping the bottom of the barrel of cheap, has been Rb's.
If someone can please explain the logic of not resigning Ronnie or Ricky, and signing Larry Johnson please clue me in. Every day I loose more faith in this regime.
I never liked the Thomas draft. He runs like a 30 something Ricky which is running without any power and goes down on first contact. The Johnson signing is an indication that they should have kept Ronnie. It's not like he was demanding a whole lot of money and you have a guy that you know. If Thomas would have punched it into the goal line we wouldn't be signing Larry. Thomas doesn't have that extra yard in him no matter what and that's what we need. We signed a guy that peaked his sophmore or junior year of college.
Hopefully Larry still has a little gas left in the tank.