Five reason why the Dolphins will be better than the NY Jets | Page 17 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Five reason why the Dolphins will be better than the NY Jets

so all plays are equal? if up or down 20 late in the 4th and you throw for 100 yds and a TD that's as good as being down 3-7 and leadin a game tying or GW drive? Really?

No, I said what a player does in the first 3.5 quarters >>>>>>>>>> what they do in the last half of the 4th.
 
No, I said what a player does in the first 3.5 quarters >>>>>>>>>> what they do in the last half of the 4th.

In some cases maybe but I'd rather have a guy struggle for 3 qtrs then play his best and help his team win in the 4th then someone who plays well for 3 qtrs then folds in winning time. Of course I'd prefer a QB who can do it all 4 qtrs but I'm not sure that is possible.
 
In some cases maybe but I'd rather have a guy struggle for 3 qtrs then play his best and help his team win in the 4th then someone who plays well for 3 qtrs then folds in winning time. Of course I'd prefer a QB who can do it all 4 qtrs but I'm not sure that is possible.

Holy **** :lol:

Are you aware that a TD is worth the exact same amount of points in each quarter?

And I cant tell if the last sentence is sarcasm or not, but if it isnt, again, holy **** :lol:
 
2 title games in 3 years, he's had 2 GREAT seasons. 2 seasons you'd be doing backflips if you had them, heck you'd do backflips if you had ONE of those seasons. His worst season was better than most of Miami's seasons in the last decade.



of course I am not talking about every poster, you guys have some sane posters:lol:



All I can say is watch the game. The boxscore only tells you so much, he was vital to our win at SD.

plenty of the "great" fantasy QBs, one example:

Philip Rivers 2008 div rd at Pitt, 21-35, 308 yds, 3 Tds, 1 INT, 105.4 rating. Looks great, right?

They were down 28-10 in the 4th qtr when he threw 2 of his 3 Tds and nearly half his pass yards in a 35-24 loss where they had no shot at any point in ythe 4th qtr.

That doesn't impress me, it looks great on the stat sheet but in reality he had a poor game. I'll give you an example against sanchez. Sanchez in the '09 tile game put up good #s, 17-30, 257, 2 Tds, 1 INT, 93 rating but this was probably his worst postseason game as he did nothing in the 2nd half.

In the '10 title game Ben was the better QB but would you know it looking at the stat sheet?

Ben: 10-19, 133 yds, 0 TDs, 2 INTs, 35.5 rating
Sanchez: 20-33, 233 yds, 2 TDs, 0 INts, 102.2 rating



2 title games in 3 seasons as a starter, that trumps all the meaningless fantasy #s.[/QUOTE]

again as ususal stats are only meaningful when they benefit your homeristic point, but when they go against the Jets, its considered "fantasy #s" lol you spin more than a ballerina

and again as usual, your entire time on this site and repeat posts, the literal only thing you write about and are so proud about are back to back LOSSES in the title game, just think about that, your main argument and proudest moment and obsession as a Jet fan, is based of LOSING games, only a jet fan
 
Holy **** :lol:

Are you aware that a TD is worth the exact same amount of points in each quarter?

And I cant tell if the last sentence is sarcasm or not, but if it isnt, again, holy **** :lol:

I am but most games are pretty close, I want a guy that can execute in big moments, I have no use for a guy that can't play when pressure is at its greatest.
 
I am but most games are pretty close, I want a guy that can execute in big moments, I have no use for a guy that can't play when pressure is at its greatest.

Most close games involve both QBs not ****ting the bed for 3 quarters.

Give me a guy that plays 4 quarters. Theres about 10 of em in the league, give or take, and one of those 10 teams win the SB every damn year these days.
 
Most close games involve both QBs not ****ting the bed for 3 quarters.

Give me a guy that plays 4 quarters. Theres about 10 of em in the league, give or take, and one of those 10 teams win the SB every damn year these days.

Eli is a guy who dosn't always play well qtrs 1-3, he's done that throughout his career and he's been great in the 4th qtr. Obviously I'd prefer a guy who can bring it all 4 qtrs but those guys are rare and I'd rather have a guy who can perform late and win games than a choker.
 
Eli is a guy who dosn't always play well qtrs 1-3, he's done that throughout his career and he's been great in the 4th qtr. Obviously I'd prefer a guy who can bring it all 4 qtrs but those guys are rare and I'd rather have a guy who can perform late and win games than a choker.


So you're saying Eli is elite...

amirite
 
junc, follow me here.

1. Is the point of the game to score more points than the other team?

2. If yes, who do you think will score more...the dude who ****s the bed for most of the game, or the one who has a bad quarter here and there (say it happens to be the 4th) but plays well the rest of the game.
 
junc, follow me here.

1. Is the point of the game to score more points than the other team?

2. If yes, who do you think will score more...the dude who ****s the bed for most of the game, or the one who has a bad quarter here and there (say it happens to be the 4th) but plays well the rest of the game.

The point of the game is to win any way you can. Sometimes you can win 13-10, other times you need to score 30+ but as long as you win it doesn't matter.
 
The point of the game is to win any way you can. Sometimes you can win 13-10, other times you need to score 30+ but as long as you win it doesn't matter.

You didnt answer my question.
 
Back
Top Bottom