Flynnsanity | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Flynnsanity

It means you'll have to rework his contract and it's a risk that such thing prevails. You would be in such situation until he signs a new deal, creating temporal cap issues to add free agents. Also that situation could become crucial if contract talks keep after the draft.

i don't think working out a contract with flynn will be that difficult if you're gonna trade a pick for him...i'm sure the contract thing then becomes pretty much a formality...miami would have a solid idea off the record of course of what kinda contract we're talking about ball park wise before they'd agree to make that trade...if they didn't like the way the numbers were looking they don't make the trade...period
 
The estimate for Flynn's services are around 5 to 6 million a year with a back loaded contract because of the uncertainty involved with him, not 15 mill. Peyton Manning however will command a number close to 15 mil if you want him in South Beach.

I have no idea where this non-sense about franchised QB numbers come into play. If the Packer franchise Flynn, good for them they will have the highest paid backup in league history. This comparison that the media is doing with Cassel is complete nonsense as well, Cassel played in 16 games and stated 15 games for ****s sake, Flynn has two under his belt. Cassel's body of work was a little more compressive at the time than Flynn.

I swear the media loves to write about utter nonsense.
NFL agreement states that a franchise player will receive the average of top 5 contracts for his position or 110% of his current contract whichever is bigger.

It's insane to put that kind of money on a guy with 2 games of experience, but it's an offer and demand issue.

There are 8 teams needing a franchise QB, but there aren't many available passers who seem to be true franchise QB, and Matt Flynn has shown he's capable of making things happen.
Yes just in two games, with great support, against questionable secondaries and without big urgency as they secured a playoff spot.

But he'll hear the best offers of this offseason.
 
i don't think working out a contract with flynn will be that difficult if you're gonna trade a pick for him...i'm sure the contract thing then becomes pretty much a formality...miami would have a solid idea off the record of course of what kinda contract we're talking about ball park wise before they'd agree to make that trade...if they didn't like the way the numbers were looking they don't make the trade...period
You will have to work a new contract before the trade, so would be competing with other teams, increasing all economic conditions.
 
Sure. I'd like to see what percentage of the time Rodgers' statistics were blown up because his RB took a flip pass and turned it into an 80 yard TD and how often blown tackles and lousy coverage contributed to good plays turning into medium to long TDs. Of course Rodgers has benefitted in the past from his receivers really aiding the cause and opposing defenses sucking, but he has a body of work that shows how often his arm, feet and mind result in great plays and outstanding QB production. Not all YAC are created equally- Flynn benefitted in that Lions game mightily from factors other than his own good play.

All you have to do is watch Rodgers play QB and throw the ball to know that he's twice the QB that Flynn will ever be. If stats were the end all and be all of rating a player, and small amounts of statistics at that, then Flynn's QBR is higher than Rodgers' for all I know, because of that one game. Does that mean that he's a better Quarterback than Rodgers? Of course not. Stats sometimes lie. They measure finite results, not the quality behind those results or mitigating circumstances.

No offense but I don't see how this is really making your case. It's like the argumentative equivalent of "Nuh uh."

You're kind of contradicting yourself. YOU are the one that broke out with this statistic that says, because 223 of Flynn's 480 yards were after the catch, he was carried in that game.

So now that I pull out a statistic that shows prettly clearly that your statistic is meaningless, all the sudden stats don't matter.

What people fail to notice when looking at 223 yards being after the catch, is that 257 tyards came on 31 completions BEFORE the catch. That's a before-catch average of 8.29 yards per completion. I once did a study on all teams from 2000 to 2008. All teams, each season...for a total of 286 seasons. Do you know where 8.29 yards before the catch ranks among the 286 data points?

Fifth. Just behind the 2000 St. Louis Rams.

Oh but that's right, statistics don't matter now. Except when you use them, apparently.

There are different ways for a QB to accumulate YAC- sometimes it's a result of great throws, leading a receiver to where they want to be to run with the rock after the catch, sometimes a quick dump off turns in to a huge play- kudos to the receiver. Sometimes the opposing defense and especially their secondary play like crap and fail to make plays, tackle after the reception, etc. And that leads to inflated stats. I have a feeling, at least from what I saw, that Flynn's YAC that are reflected in his big numbers against the Lions are more due to his receivers making great plays and the Lions secondary sucking arse. It doesn't mean by any means that Flynn didn't play a very good game, but again- color me unimpressed, especially as per the notion that Flynn is now Mr. Wonderful.

You're kind of blowing my mind a little bit, man. You speak really strongly about this guy's Detroit game even admitting you've not even seen it. You've seen how many of the throws on a highlight film? Maybe 6 of them? Just the touchdowns? Did you know that in the first half with 2nd & Goal from the 7 yard line on a drive that ended in Field Goal, Flynn threw what should have been a 7th touchdown straight to Donald Driver's front shoulder in the small window between defenders on a curl/flat route combination, with Driver popping the ball right off his front shoulder pad? Of course you didn't know that, because you haven't seen the game. I'm not trying to pick on you, it just boggles my mind that you keep talking so strongly about his performance in this game and then saying oh by the way I haven't seen anything but highlights on it.

Now, if you want to know about the nature of the YAC plays…I can tell you, because I have seen the game, and I have it on tap and can watch it whenever I please. The first big RAC play you may have seen since it was a TD, a little flanker screen to Jordy Nelson from 7 yards out of the end zone (not the drive referenced above, different drive). Jordy stiff armed a corner to the dirt and ran for the TD. Easy to give all the credit to Nelson, of course, but it was Matt Flynn that made this play happen because he recognized the soft coverage on the outside and then put Tom Crabtree in motion, and when he saw that the defense didn't change, he raised his right hand (the side Nelson was on) and made a horn signal with it above his helmet. The signal happened so fast, it didn't register with the defense, but Flynn knew that Nelson would see it, and he did, and so Jordy knew to hang back for the screen.

The second big RAC play you probably also saw because it was the long TD to Ryan Grant. Here's the thing, this looks more like an adjustment than a screen. You've got no OLs pulling out in front of Grant. The WRs are all running routes. It looks like an adjustment made because #54 from the strong side started blitzing right at the snap. Donald Driver recognized that the SAM that was supposed to cover him short, was blitzing, and so he did as he's taught in that offense and runs a stick route with his head looking back to the QB right off the line. This would have been the easiest adjustment for Flynn to make, but he wanted the delay route to Grant. So, that's what he throws. The reason Driver starts blocking is not because it's a screen called by Mike McCarthy, but rather because he's been looking back to the QB the entire route waiting to see if Flynn throws him hot, and so he saw Flynn get the ball off to the running back. You say RAC plays only count for the QB if they make a really smart decision and throw the ball to the right spot, right? Well this was a smart decision, and with a guy in his face he stayed calm and threw a nice catchable ball into Grant's bread basket giving him the maximum chance of securing the ball easily and running with it. It was a nice touchdown for Flynn.

The next big RAC play came on a screen to James Jones from the slot. I can't tell if Flynn made this call at the line based on the defense or not. The ball, of course, was placed perfectly. I'm reminded of a play like this where Chad Henne threw the ball so far behind Hartline that Brian had to twirl all the way around to catch it and then run out to the sidelines, and during those acrobatics Brian fumbled the ball. When Henne came back to the sidelines, Tony Sparano told him that the fumble was HIS fault because of the bad ball placement. Perfect ball placement here leads to a nice 11 yard run by James Jones, who did nothing really that impressive in his run after catch.

Here's a nice example of a RAC play that did NOT happen. This time on 1st & 10 with 1 minute left in the first half, they actually DID call a screen play to Brandon Saine, he's got OLs pulling out front of him and everything, and Saine only gets about 4 yards because he doesn't use his blocking well at all.

Another play that got about 8 yards after catch was just Flynn recognizing the coverage and throwing the dump off to Kuhn. But he hit him front shoulder, on the run, with a nice catchable ball. Why wouldn't Flynn get credit for that?

On 1st & 10 with 6:35 remaining in the 3rd quarter he throws another WR screen to Nelson, but Nelson this time only gets about 5 yards with it. Next big chunk of RAC is another TD play.

Off the play-action he throws the deep post route, about 50 yards through the air, leads Nelson to the inside away from his coverage and Nelson does a good job staying on his feet after the contact, running out the remaining 12 yards for a TD.

Next big RAC play comes on 1st & 10 with 10:15 left in the 4th quarter. This is another screen call from the I Formation as both Kuhn the FB and Saine the HB run out to the right side with Kuhn blocking in front. Flynn does a great job selling this with his eyes by staring up the middle of the field while Kuhn and Saine get into position. Then, in rhythm, Flynn snaps out the ball with absolutely perfect placement so that Saine can catch it on the run, running right through it with minimal trouble. Clever play call, design and execution, gets about 18 yards after the catch without Saine doing anything special whatsoever. They talk about short passing games being "extended run plays". This was exactly that, an extended toss sweep, utilizing your quarterback's consistent good ball placement and execution in order to get a 12 yard play out of what otherwise could be more like a 4 yard play if they'd just run the toss right off the snap.

The next RAC play you probably saw because it's another TD. Tell me, what did Donald Driver do here that was so special? Because for Flynn, there was great anticipation in this throw, as the ball was out before Driver had started to cross in front of the coverage. The placement was so good that Driver could run right through it without losing any speed and so naturally Chris Harris just stood no chance of catching him. A ball that is ANY less well placed, this is an 8 yard completion. Instead it was a 35 yard TD and the credit for that goes to Flynn.

I don't know if this is in your highlight film but the throw to James Jones on the outside to set up the final go-ahead touchdown...just absolutely superb. That about wraps it up for the RAC plays. I see a whole lot of sound quarterbacking, more than I see guys making ridiculous plays by breaking contact, etc.

That about wraps it up.
 
I don't believe we're going after Flynn anyway....I believe we'll draft a QB late in round one(if we can move down) or in the 2nd round and Moore will start the year as the starter.

Ozzy rules!!
 
No offense but I don't see how this is really making your case. It's like the argumentative equivalent of "Nuh uh."

You're kind of contradicting yourself. YOU are the one that broke out with this statistic that says, because 223 of Flynn's 480 yards were after the catch, he was carried in that game.

So now that I pull out a statistic that shows prettly clearly that your statistic is meaningless, all the sudden stats don't matter.

What people fail to notice when looking at 223 yards being after the catch, is that 257 tyards came on 31 completions BEFORE the catch. That's a before-catch average of 8.29 yards per completion. I once did a study on all teams from 2000 to 2008. All teams, each season...for a total of 286 seasons. Do you know where 8.29 yards before the catch ranks among the 286 data points?

Fifth. Just behind the 2000 St. Louis Rams.

Oh but that's right, statistics don't matter now. Except when you use them, apparently.



You're kind of blowing my mind a little bit, man. You speak really strongly about this guy's Detroit game even admitting you've not even seen it. You've seen how many of the throws on a highlight film? Maybe 6 of them? Just the touchdowns? Did you know that in the first half with 2nd & Goal from the 7 yard line on a drive that ended in Field Goal, Flynn threw what should have been a 7th touchdown straight to Donald Driver's front shoulder in the small window between defenders on a curl/flat route combination, with Driver popping the ball right off his front shoulder pad? Of course you didn't know that, because you haven't seen the game. I'm not trying to pick on you, it just boggles my mind that you keep talking so strongly about his performance in this game and then saying oh by the way I haven't seen anything but highlights on it.

Now, if you want to know about the nature of the YAC plays…I can tell you, because I have seen the game, and I have it on tap and can watch it whenever I please. The first big RAC play you may have seen since it was a TD, a little flanker screen to Jordy Nelson from 7 yards out of the end zone (not the drive referenced above, different drive). Jordy stiff armed a corner to the dirt and ran for the TD. Easy to give all the credit to Nelson, of course, but it was Matt Flynn that made this play happen because he recognized the soft coverage on the outside and then put Tom Crabtree in motion, and when he saw that the defense didn't change, he raised his right hand (the side Nelson was on) and made a horn signal with it above his helmet. The signal happened so fast, it didn't register with the defense, but Flynn knew that Nelson would see it, and he did, and so Jordy knew to hang back for the screen.

The second big RAC play you probably also saw because it was the long TD to Ryan Grant. Here's the thing, this looks more like an adjustment than a screen. You've got no OLs pulling out in front of Grant. The WRs are all running routes. It looks like an adjustment made because #54 from the strong side started blitzing right at the snap. Donald Driver recognized that the SAM that was supposed to cover him short, was blitzing, and so he did as he's taught in that offense and runs a stick route with his head looking back to the QB right off the line. This would have been the easiest adjustment for Flynn to make, but he wanted the delay route to Grant. So, that's what he throws. The reason Driver starts blocking is not because it's a screen called by Mike McCarthy, but rather because he's been looking back to the QB the entire route waiting to see if Flynn throws him hot, and so he saw Flynn get the ball off to the running back. You say RAC plays only count for the QB if they make a really smart decision and throw the ball to the right spot, right? Well this was a smart decision, and with a guy in his face he stayed calm and threw a nice catchable ball into Grant's bread basket giving him the maximum chance of securing the ball easily and running with it. It was a nice touchdown for Flynn.

The next big RAC play came on a screen to James Jones from the slot. I can't tell if Flynn made this call at the line based on the defense or not. The ball, of course, was placed perfectly. I'm reminded of a play like this where Chad Henne threw the ball so far behind Hartline that Brian had to twirl all the way around to catch it and then run out to the sidelines, and during those acrobatics Brian fumbled the ball. When Henne came back to the sidelines, Tony Sparano told him that the fumble was HIS fault because of the bad ball placement. Perfect ball placement here leads to a nice 11 yard run by James Jones, who did nothing really that impressive in his run after catch.

Here's a nice example of a RAC play that did NOT happen. This time on 1st & 10 with 1 minute left in the first half, they actually DID call a screen play to Brandon Saine, he's got OLs pulling out front of him and everything, and Saine only gets about 4 yards because he doesn't use his blocking well at all.

Another play that got about 8 yards after catch was just Flynn recognizing the coverage and throwing the dump off to Kuhn. But he hit him front shoulder, on the run, with a nice catchable ball. Why wouldn't Flynn get credit for that?

On 1st & 10 with 6:35 remaining in the 3rd quarter he throws another WR screen to Nelson, but Nelson this time only gets about 5 yards with it. Next big chunk of RAC is another TD play.

Off the play-action he throws the deep post route, about 50 yards through the air, leads Nelson to the inside away from his coverage and Nelson does a good job staying on his feet after the contact, running out the remaining 12 yards for a TD.

Next big RAC play comes on 1st & 10 with 10:15 left in the 4th quarter. This is another screen call from the I Formation as both Kuhn the FB and Saine the HB run out to the right side with Kuhn blocking in front. Flynn does a great job selling this with his eyes by staring up the middle of the field while Kuhn and Saine get into position. Then, in rhythm, Flynn snaps out the ball with absolutely perfect placement so that Saine can catch it on the run, running right through it with minimal trouble. Clever play call, design and execution, gets about 18 yards after the catch without Saine doing anything special whatsoever. They talk about short passing games being "extended run plays". This was exactly that, an extended toss sweep, utilizing your quarterback's consistent good ball placement and execution in order to get a 12 yard play out of what otherwise could be more like a 4 yard play if they'd just run the toss right off the snap.

The next RAC play you probably saw because it's another TD. Tell me, what did Donald Driver do here that was so special? Because for Flynn, there was great anticipation in this throw, as the ball was out before Driver had started to cross in front of the coverage. The placement was so good that Driver could run right through it without losing any speed and so naturally Chris Harris just stood no chance of catching him. A ball that is ANY less well placed, this is an 8 yard completion. Instead it was a 35 yard TD and the credit for that goes to Flynn.

I don't know if this is in your highlight film but the throw to James Jones on the outside to set up the final go-ahead touchdown...just absolutely superb. That about wraps it up for the RAC plays. I see a whole lot of sound quarterbacking, more than I see guys making ridiculous plays by breaking contact, etc.

That about wraps it up.

I had no doubt that you were winding up for a really long winded post that, as usual, essentially changes nothing as per my opinion. There is no hypocrisy in terms of the YAC, no need for

"Oh but that's right, statistics don't matter now. Except when you use them, apparently."

The first thing that I noticed was "Man, Flynn got a lot of help in that game, from his guys and Detroit." I didn't know the exact YAC number until I read in in the Barry Jackson piece. Let me refresh your memory, just so you don't think that I'm the only one out there who had the same thought about Flynn:

But here’s a precautionary note pointed out to us about Flynn’s signature game (480 yards, six touchdowns against Detroit on Jan. 1): A lot of his damage was done against two defensive backs ranked in the bottom quarter of the league (Chris Harris and Alphonso Smith) and a cornerback (Chris Houston) who was limited that day because of injury. Plus, the Packers had 223 yards after catch."

I defer to my own opinion always, but apparently I'm not the only one out there who saw the same thing, Jackson and his sources took notice as well. I don't see how anyone could not, quite frankly. I made a point of mentioning that yes, Flynn made some good throws, no doubt. I recall the crossing pattern to Driver and a deep ball down the right sideline to Jones, among others. But the point stands, and it's simple enough: he got a LOT of help in putting up those gaudy numbers from his guys and the Detroit secondary.

This is from the Cosell article in a different thread, and I think that it sums it up the issue of Matt Flynn pretty well:

"How does this relate to Matt Flynn in 2012? Flynn, at 6-foot-2, does not possess prototypical size. He has above-average arm strength, nothing more. There are power throws he will struggle to make, like deep digs at 18-22 yards, or deep comebacks. In fact, these are not throws you would ask Flynn to make. The bottom line: Flynn is not a top-level passer. His attributes, based on film breakdown of his two NFL starts, derive from his talent as a timing and rhythm passer who’s decisive with his reads and throws, and has shown good accuracy in the short to intermediate areas. He’s primarily a plant-and-throw quarterback who makes good decisions, and delivers the ball on time. One thing I liked was his pocket movement. He showed the ability to slide and maintain his downfield focus. That’s a far more important trait than running out of the pocket.

Flynn, I believe, can be a successful NFL starter, but — and here’s where the Walsh archetype comes into play — he must be carefully manipulated by the schematics of the passing game, and helped by the play-calling. He’s not Aaron Rodgers simply because he put up better numbers in a late-season start. Rodgers is an exception, a supremely talented passer with rare traits. Few quarterbacks in NFL history have thrown with Rodgers’ combination of velocity and accuracy.
Flynn is a member of a much larger quarterback fraternity, players who need to be coached and managed to maximize the skills they possess. They must be defined and enhanced by the methodology and the concepts of the passing game. That’s the way it works in the NFL for 80-90 percent of its quarterbacks.

That’s why it would make good sense for Flynn to join his former offensive coordinator in Miami. Philbin understands from personal experience Flynn’s strengths and limitations. If he gets the chance, he will take a page from the Bill Walsh book, and cast Flynn in his rightful role: an efficient passer in a multi-dimensional passing game in which the scheme rules, not the quarterback."

As a side note to that, I find any comparisons of Flynn to Aaron Rodgers to be purely comical.

The whole point of the thread is not that Matt Flynn sucks, it's that gaudy one game numbers and a two game resume is a pretty thin body of work to judge a guy on. I pointed out that yeah, he made some good throws, looked pretty good from what I saw- byt he got a LOT of help from his receivers and the Lions secondary and he has an AVERAGE arm. As to whether, as you pointed out, an average NFL arm is a good arm strikes me as a waste of breath and/or key strokes. What you want in the NFL, if you can get it, is a GREAT arm, along with the other essential attributes. Enter Brandon Weeden.

If Philbin is of the mind set that Flynn is the guy, so be it. If he can be a great system QB in the system that he and Philbin know intimately, great. What I question is Flynn being worth a high price tag and maybe a premium draft pick based on the thinnest of resumes and an average arm. I'm not sure at all that he's better than Matt Moore, who has a ton more NFL experience. These sort of moves didn't work with Daunte Culpepper, didn't work with AJ Feeley, and thank God we weren't dumb enough to actually force a trade for Kyle Orton and live with those consequences in terms of money, contract obligation and a wasted draft pick. The market spoke, and Orton was, of course, later waived as he should have been.

So you'll forgive me, kindly, if I have some doubts as to Matt Flynn and how good he really is.
 
You just get done citing Greg Cosell saying that he has above-average arm strength and then you assess (based on not having watched the Detroit game, only having watched highlights) that he has an AVERAGE (caps for emphasis) arm. Umm, ok.

Doesn't change the fact that you started using statistics to explain your case and then quickly took the "statistics don't matter" stance once you realized how imperfect those statistics were and how they don't say anything close to what you thought they did.
 
You just get done citing Greg Cosell saying that he has above-average arm strength and then you assess (based on not having watched the Detroit game, only having watched highlights) that he has an AVERAGE (caps for emphasis) arm. Umm, ok.

Doesn't change the fact that you started using statistics to explain your case and then quickly took the "statistics don't matter" stance once you realized how imperfect those statistics were and how they don't say anything close to what you thought they did.[/
QUOTE]

Totally untrue, your reading comprehension skills are lacking today. That Rodgers and Flynn having similar YAC stats doesn't necessarily tell the whole story, and Rodgers' actual, real life, substantial body of work justifies his YAC and shows waht he's all about. The point is the obvious, significant help that Flynn got in that one game, and that I doubt that Rodgers has enjoyed an equivalent of receivers breaking tackles for TDs, screen plays for TDs and crappy secondary play ON AVERAGE for his whole career. Sure it happens, just not as frquently as Flynn enjoyed it against the Lions. Flynn got some big time breaks in that game as per his gaudy stats, and for the umpteenth tiime that doesn't mean that he didn't play a very good game.

Flynn's skinny resume and average arm just don't do it for me. And I'm not contradicting myself at all if I like the Cosell article, agree with the majority of it, and at the same think that Flynn's arm is average while Cosell finds it to be above average with significant limitations. That's just weak commentary on your part.
 
i don't get the brandon weeden has the most elite of nfl arms...i don't think thats the case...can he make very throw sure but he doesn't possess a flacco or a jay cutler arm...imo the further down the field his ball goes the more velocity comes off the ball...or at least the ball can kinda die a little...again not a i don't like his arm thing but also not a he's got gods gift arm either...

and if people think that me sayin matt flynn in the lions game to me looked like a poor mans aaron rodgers minus the elite arm is a joke well to each his own...i saw a lot of similarities in their play minus the power arm rodgers has but that cannon of his separates him from a lot of guys...a lot of starting and even quality nfl qbs
 
you need to wrap your mind around the fact that a good oc is not gonna ask flynn to fire the ball outside the numbers deep on a line like what you see from the ravens o and flacco...a good oc is gonna play to flynns timing and accuracy and ball placement and put him in an o that fits his strength...not ask him to throw the ball through a wall on 20 yard outs and comebacks etc...cosell needs to reaize that also...and if flynn needs a stable platform to throw off so what...most qbs do and the ones that just try to get away with their arm and poor footwork who make it are few and far between...

this is looking to me like if a guy doesn;t have a cannon arm or really close to one jim doesn't like him as a pro qb...and i used to be very much that mindset but timing and accuracy and a solid arm not a noodle which flynn doesn't have anyways can make up for a lot of things...case in point chad henne...big arm terrible timing and anticipation...has to see things develop before he pulls the trigger...and its one of the reasons why he was so horrid in the red zone...
 
NFL agreement states that a franchise player will receive the average of top 5 contracts for his position or 110% of his current contract whichever is bigger.

It's insane to put that kind of money on a guy with 2 games of experience, but it's an offer and demand issue.

There are 8 teams needing a franchise QB, but there aren't many available passers who seem to be true franchise QB, and Matt Flynn has shown he's capable of making things happen.
Yes just in two games, with great support, against questionable secondaries and without big urgency as they secured a playoff spot.

But he'll hear the best offers of this offseason.

That's actually not true anymore with the new CBA it is percentage of the total cap but in the case of Flynn that really won't matter because the numbers are so similar, here is the new policy for what it is worth, in the short term it really has little effect but over the next 4 seasons franchise tags will drop as a result of this formula:

Under Article 9, Section 2(a)(i) of the CBA, the franchise tender for each position arises from a formula that takes the value of franchise tags for the last five years, adds them up, divides them by the total value of the salary cap for the last five years, and multiplies the resulting percentage by the salary cap for the current year. (Since there was no salary cap in 2010, the number to be used will be the average of the salary cap in 2009 and 2011.)

But forget about the formula because there is no denying the tag for a QB this season is 14.4mil. To me that is an extremely high gamble to take on a QB with 2 games experience and it also eats all of Green Bay's cap room assuming they make the space. To tag Flynn they are currently 10 to 11mill under the cap so they would have to clear up 3 or 4 mil of space.

The media seems to think that Green Bay will only tag Fylnn if there is a trade partner in the wings and a deal in principle is already worked out, my question to the media would be "why on Earth would I work a deal out head of the free agent period if it was going to cost me an extra 10mill and a 2nd round pick? Why not just sit and wait and be the highest bidder? The speculation on this is assassin, 14.4 mil and a 2nd for a guy who played 2 games in the NFL, I gotta bridge to sell Miami, you interested!

Manning will be a free agent before the free agent period begins, the Packers need to gauge interest in Flynn by roughly March 5th or a week before the free agent period begins. Tagging Flynn is like going all in with a pair of deuces before the flop, pretty ****ing stupid on Green Bay's part if you ask me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the pack are gauging interest in flynn as we speak at the combine...no doubt about it
 
look what i found...key line in this whole thing is if he is tagged and traded for a pick the team that trades for him is allowed to rework his contract on a long term pact (which you wouldn't trade for him unless you had parameters for a long term contract pretty much ironed out) to reduce the cap impact in 2012...you trade for matt flynn and sign him to a deal he's not chewing up $14 mil of your cap by any means...only way i see flynn getting traded for less than 2nd round comp is if there is in fact only one suitor for his services in trade and your bidding against yourself...otherwise i think someone ponys up that 2nd rounder...heck i think the pack in the end likely gets that 2nd rounder from you anyways during trade negotiations

anyways...interesting read

http://nfl.si.com/2012/02/23/with-j...t-focus-to-matt-flynn/?sct=hp_wr_a2&eref=sihp
 
i don't get the brandon weeden has the most elite of nfl arms...i don't think thats the case...can he make very throw sure but he doesn't possess a flacco or a jay cutler arm...imo the further down the field his ball goes the more velocity comes off the ball...or at least the ball can kinda die a little...again not a i don't like his arm thing but also not a he's got gods gift arm either...

and if people think that me sayin matt flynn in the lions game to me looked like a poor mans aaron rodgers minus the elite arm is a joke well to each his own...i saw a lot of similarities in their play minus the power arm rodgers has but that cannon of his separates him from a lot of guys...a lot of starting and even quality nfl qbs

I love Weeden's arm, but I don't think that it's quite the gun of a Brady, Rodgers or Stafford. But it's an excellent arm power wise, and Weeden is extremely accurate- it's just a great arm. I prefer it to Flacco's and Cutler's- Flacco can heave it about 72 yards max and the guy has a very good arm, but his name doesn't come to mind when I think of the best NFL arms. Cutler was my prefence thie year that he came out, and he's bull strong with a very powerful arm. But it always bothered me how wristy he can be, which has led him to be a safeties' delight on numerous occasions, floating the ball over his target with that wristy motion. The floppy wrist reminds me of Jay Fiedler, who drove me nuts sailing balls over his receivers' heads into the arms of waiting safeties - I saw it in person more than once, a game agains tthe Raiders comes to mind as a particularly odious example- might have been Tony Dorsetts' kid who picked it off. Roger Staubach was wristy,too, but that's another story.

The antithesis of the wrist variable to me is Tom Brady- solid as a rock. Throws bbs, laser beams even in cold weather, passes that just amaze me sometimes.

Weeden, in my mind, will have a top notch NFL arm with very good power and outstanding ball placement and overall accuracy. He can make every throw in the book, from short endzone fades to deep posts, deep outs and airing it out on bombs. He can do it all.
 
if you're looking for a guy to throw 40 yard ropes flacco and cutler imo are the 2 guys who can throw it through you...flacco in that afc championship game threw an inward post to boldin that not 3 nfl qbs could make that throw with that velocity and on a line...just a rediculous throw...cutler can throw off an uneven platform in traffic like few i've ever seen...

rodgers stafford brady they all got great arms but bradys i think is one that has gotten much better since he's been in the pros...it wasn't always that way...i don't think i'd put bradys arm in the category of any of these other guys...not quite

but to each his own...
 
Back
Top Bottom