At least he wasn’t a great big puss like Gase is turning out to be.
What does this even mean?
At least he wasn’t a great big puss like Gase is turning out to be.
But Jarvis could have been had at a tolerable price if we signed him last year.
Holy ****! I stand corrected. It really didn’t feel like it but damn.
I could be wrong but I thought Drake lead the NFL in rushing the last 5 weeks of the season.
Yup! and the last 5 games isnt a arbitrary number cherry picked stat... Drake started getting 10+ in week 12... So when they made him the starter, he led the league...I could be wrong but I thought Drake lead the NFL in rushing the last 5 weeks of the season.
Some guys they give the benefit of letting them know before the frenzy of FA. A lot of other players are likely submitted with a list just before the 4 p.m. deadline of the new league year.
Yeah, it's all mindless rationalization. Are fans still trying to rationalize the Ajayi trade LMAO? Pinning offensive woes on Ajayi, dealing with Jay Cutler's early incompetence, while seeing 8 and 9 in the box? Cmon man. Did the Eagles offense struggle when they traded Ajayi, too? En route to the Super Bowl? lol
Let's put that foolish narrative to bed, and just imagine the offense that could've been, centered around an Ajayi and Drake rushing attack. The same Drake who Gase somehow refused to PLAY prior to the trade, and even hyped up an increased role by Damien Williams, before even mentioning Drake. It took a shoulder injury to Damien Williams for the Drake emergence to even happen. And we're trusting Adam Gase roster evaluations? No.
The fans who think you can lose the majority of your top end talent for barely anything, and come out cleaner on the other side are very naive, and.. well... stupid.
Look at the track records. What's there to go off on with these three current stooges in place?
At least he wasn’t a great big puss like Gase is turning out to be.