By your logic, sarcasm can be taken as truth.Until AR can catch his own passes, block the DE and cover opposite wr, it is exactly how it works.
By your logic, Dilfer was a better qb than Marino.
Personally I dont think he leaves and and you get a 2-3 more most likely very productive seasons from him but take solace in the fact your team has shown a willingness to spend a draft pick on QB even though they have a great one in place (Rodgers/Favre.... Love/Rodgers). The Packers no doubt get how important the position is, how a young QB can benefit playing behind an elite vet and how regardless of need that the QB position is one you throw resources at to ensure you get it right. That doesn't guarantee anything about Jordan Love but the mindset of the organization is sound.If Rodgers leaves we’re going to be in the tank for a long time.
@Dan13Forever wasn't here when finheaven anoited Jay Fiedler, or the Ray Lucas bandwagon. The Cleo Lemons, the "insert" mediocre qb. Not saying Ryan isn't mediocre, but Ryan has a good history of playing horrible after a stride of great games.FinHeaven: where all franchise Quarterbacks arent worth trading for but Ryan Fitzpatrick would have won us a superbowl.
I hope the Packers are smart enough to sign him to a new 4 year contract but they were basically in a win NOW mode this past season. They really have no cap space at this time and they will likely lose quite a few solid starters in free agency.If Rodgers leaves we’re going to be in the tank for a long time.
In all time sports discussions I always differentiate GOATs and BOATs - Greatest vs Best. (In boxing I've had these arguments with some of the actual candidates for GOATS and BOATS; I was a pro boxing cutman for many years). I consider Brady the GOAT, as much as I don't like it, but at least arguably is not the BOAT. Marino cannot be the GOAT for me (still in the top 5-7), but is in the argument for BOAT.Since you decided to go here, I gotta specifically comment on it. Because IMO it shows a complete lack of understanding.
Even the late great Bill Walsh once said, “Joe Montana was the product of the system, Dan Marino was the system."
I wouldn’t call Brady a product of a system per se, but rather the product of a great team and great organization. Unlike Marino, Brady didn’t play for many super flawed teams. Teams devoid of good defense and special teams. And when the Pats were flawed, they didn’t win Super Bowls. Or even appear in them.....................
Amen. This is how I see it as well. To be called the greatest, as Brady has been called, there should be some blowout, domination at some point. Neither Super Bowl fits that bill. Brady is so lucky that he never once had to even play for a bad team.
Maybe a GOAT of College football but was a clown of a NFL HC. We needed a QB, he drafted a RB....I can spell it as Satan if you'd like!It's spelled S A B A N...get the GOAT right....and who on our staff could invest three years to fix his throwing motion?
And HOW many other teams passed on him?...Aaron wasn't drafted third overall ..was he?
If his goal is a Super Bowl, he’d be wise to stay in the NFC.As a football fan I would absolutely love to see Rogers in San Fran!