The point isn't that Tannehill should do what they do. The point is stop making excuses for the guy. He was God-awful for the past two weeks.
And he was fantastic the three weeks prior.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The point isn't that Tannehill should do what they do. The point is stop making excuses for the guy. He was God-awful for the past two weeks.
The point isn't that Tannehill should do what they do. The point is stop making excuses for the guy. He was God-awful for the past two weeks.
Ridiculous, Rodgers sat for a while before he started. Tom Brady sat almost his first full first year. Drew Brees, like others have said was average at best in SD. The list goes on and on. Sometimes it takes 2-3 years for them to get it, others more. I'm not prepared to dump a QB that was drafted as a "project" and should have sat his first year. But we started him since day one and im going to back him until the team decides otherwise.
The point isn't that Tannehill should do what they do. The point is stop making excuses for the guy. He was God-awful for the past two weeks.
The point isn't that Tannehill should do what they do. The point is stop making excuses for the guy. He was God-awful for the past two weeks.
so you judge a qb on a week to week basis? you dont judge them on their body of work?
In Brees' last two years in San Diego he threw 51 TDs vs. 21 INTs. And his team was 20-11. Far from "average at best".
7 points, 3 interceptions and and a 47 quarterbacking rating in 8 quarters of football. With the playoffs on the line. Outplayed by Thad Lewis and Geno Smith.
Let that sink in.
His body of work is not good. Did you miss the 31 games he played?
so you judge a qb on a week to week basis? you dont judge them on their body of work?
7 points, 3 interceptions and and a 47 quarterbacking rating in 8 quarters of football. With the playoffs on the line. Outplayed by Thad Lewis and Geno Smith.
Let that sink in.