C
First off, i don't base it on anything after the 4th and probably only the 3rd. Anything after is really for developmental players and I typically don't know anything about them, or in this case, the schools they play for.
I don't want starters in the 1st round, I want potential stars; potential game-breakers. I feel a good GM can find starters, particularly at RT and OG (and C of course) from in the late second and on. I have no doubt he'll be a starter, and drafted that high, it will be a serious disappointment if he isn't a pro bowler. I just feel that the first should be used to grab those players that can make a team a championship contender. Star playmakers do that. But hey, we have 3 1st rounders on the line now, so at least there is no excuse. Time for Tannehill to put up or shut up. The only reason it's not lower is because there is limited bust potential, or at least there ****ing better be. I don't want to spend another 1st on a RT...well, ever again.
Landry moves this to a C. Love the pick. He's not a #1 or anything (those are usually found in the 1st), but he has a higher ceiling than Gibson or Hartline.
I like Billy Turner. I think he will be a good starter for years. It goes back to my statement that these guys can be found later on (Moses is another example). However, I do not like ponying up a 3rd and 4th for him (where he was picked and the pick it took to get there), especially in a rare draft in which you still have a good chance of finding immediate contributors in the 4th.
Okay, I'll bump it up to a C+ because I do like what I've seen from Tripp. The guy is probably already better than Wheeler.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk