Grade Hickeys first draft and why? | Page 8 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Grade Hickeys first draft and why?

Yep I'm well aware of who was on our team and how much money they made, and that doesn't change my point. The poster Spesh said Hickey is following the Ireland formula of "spending hard on the line", which is completely wrong, and I stand by my statement.

And Samson Satele wasn't drafted by Ireland. And for comparison, no we didn't generally spend more on the OL than other teams during that era. Even if we did spend more, its foolish to say that we shouldn't invest in the OL just because Ireland made poor decisions. Just FYI, Ireland isnt employed by the Miami Dolphins anymore.

Not sure I understand what you are saying. It's my fault but just to be sure, are you saying Hickey isn't spending "hard on the OL" or that Ireland didn't. If your stance is that Ireland didn't spend big bucks on the OL then I am going to have to disagree. I would like to see a team other than MAYBE SF that spent more money and resources on the OL than did Ireland.
 
Not sure I understand what you are saying. It's my fault but just to be sure, are you saying Hickey isn't spending "hard on the OL" or that Ireland didn't. If your stance is that Ireland didn't spend big bucks on the OL then I am going to have to disagree. I would like to see a team other than MAYBE SF that spent more money and resources on the OL than did Ireland.

What I said was Hickey is not following the Ireland formula of "spending hard on the line", which is a claim someone else made in this thread.
 
Yes, and before the O-line stunk it up he attempted to pay Jake Long $9 million a year and tried to trade for Branden Albert. You dont think that he would have snagged Albert for no draft compensation and paid him what he tried to pay Long? Especially since Ireland already agreed to Albert's contract demands once before?



http://tracking.si.com/2013/04/22/branden-albert-dolphins-trade-contract-demands-chiefs/

Jeff Ireland had more invested in keeping Tannehill upright then Dennis Hickey does. After all, Ireland picked Tannehill, not Hickey. Ireland, after giving Hartline an extension and signing Wallace, felt our offense was set except for the offensive line. Ireland's philosophy dictated drafting lineman high and skill position(other than corner) late in the draft.
Yes, Ireland would have spent hard in free agency. He would have nabbed Albert and probably have spent upwards of $30 million on a guard. But he also would have gone after a right tackle in the draft, especially after being burned with Colombo and Clabo via free agency. Recall, Ireland brought in 2 centers in free agency, when those didnt work he drafted Pouncey in the top half of the first round.

We should invest what the most successful teams in the league invest in their offensive line. Blindside protectors should be grabbed relatively high(and even thats debatable). But once you have that down? Second day selections and use coaching to compensate(roll outs and rb blocking). Second round picks being the highest they should go, and thats only after either 1) having a established nucleus of talent or 2) the player is significantly better then anyone else available at that pick. Why? Because for every investment we make in the line, we dont make an investment in the rest of the team. We could have the best line in the history of the NFL, but it wont matter when our defense is being gouged and our receivers are giving up on plays, dropping passes, and falling on the dirt anytime someone gets within a few feet of them. Just like we should never take a kicker or punter with top selections, we should have understood the value of the position.

This "spending hard on the line" philosophy hasnt worked. Ireland proved that. Just as he would have proven again had he stayed. Now Hickey followed his example and smart money says it ends in the exact same way. After all, just because we made a big investment in the position doesnt mean it was the right one.
WOW, just wow, post of the year. I totally agree. You have to invest in OL but reaching in the first round is not where the value is. Had this been a weak draft, and Martin or one of the other top tackles would have fallen to us I wouldn't even mind using a 1st on one, but in a draft this deep, and with the 4 2nd tier tackles so close in talent level, it made no sense to draft one in the 1st. There was a 100% chance that one of the four would have been there in the 2nd, and to be honest I think we got the worst of the bunch. Mark it down Moses will be the best all around player at the NFL level.

Personally I thought Ireland was great at many things GMs are responsible for, but he was horrible at drafting. Therefore I had no problem with finding a new one. But I said before he left that change for the sake of change is never a good thing. We had to find an IMPROVEMENT before making a change. To date I see no improvement in drafting players and some decline in free agency. But what I find most discouraging is that we are no longer the one getting the best end of the deals. Ireland made one of the best deals in the franchise history last year moving up in the first, did he get the right player, time will tell, but the point is he always got the best end of the trades. Hickey got roasted in his moving around. We lost nearly 50 pts in draft value, which equals losing a mid 4th rd pick with nothing in return. That isn't including all the value he could have picked up by not reaching for James in the first.

And I got a news break for some of ya. If you would have rated our OL this time last year vs the OL this year, right now, last year's was considerably better ON PAPER.

CENTER: Pouncey vs Pouncey. Last year he had no ties to bullygate like he does this year and was looked at as a top 5 center in the league. This year he has warts, and is in the coaches doghouse. But lets call it a wash, although a case could be made that last years version was better.

TACKLE: Martin & Clabo, vs Albert and James. Again we are not looking at this from today's view but rather how we ranked them this time last year. Clabo was a probowl tackle coming in that was the perfect fit. He played in this system and was thought to be the answer at RT, Martin was a PERCIEVED 1st rd talent, taken in the 2nd rd, with a year under his belt who came on to play better at the end of the previous season. He was moving back to his original position. Everyone knew he was going to be the weak link but no one could have predicted the melt down. This year we have another probowl tackle coming in who seems like the perfect fit. I admit Albert is a better prospect than even what we THOUGHT Clabo would be but make no mistakes, Albert had his best year last year in a contract year, and has stayed healthy all year just one time in his career. James is a rookie with a 2nd rd grade taken in the 1st. Rated very close to where Martin was when he came out. There WILL be many bumps playing a rookie RT. Even great prospects like the two taken early last year had many bumps and James is no where near there ability.
Conclusion, Albert is better, MUCH better than what we expected out of Martin. Albert an (8 out of scale 1-10), Martin a 3 out of scale 1-10). But Clabo was PERCIEVED to be much better than a rookie. Clabo a (7 out of scale 1-10), while James is a 4 maybe even 5 out of 10. Add last years tackles together and you get a (3+7=10 out of 20), and this year (8+4/5=12/13). So the tackles are better this year but not by the margin most would think.

Guards. Last year this time we had Jerry and Rich. Rich had seemed to have his anger problems under control, there was even a ESPN piece about it. He seemed the model citizen, and his play was never the issue. A very solid guard, (7 out of scale 1-10). Jerry was many people's punching bag because of his high draft status and his weight problems but he always graded out in the top half of the league on the field. Lets call him a 6 out of 10, although he was probably rated higher by most other teams. This year we have ?? Shelly maybe, as our best OG. He was ranked as the 61st out of 65 starting guards in pass blocking last year. He was a bad, very bad starting guard last year. He is a good run blocker but is at best a backup. If he is our starting OG we are in trouble, but by the looks of things he is the best we got (3 out of scale 1-10). Dallas Thomas is even worse although I have high hopes for him. But if last year is any indication, and since that is all we can really go on I have to give him a (2 out of 10). Turner is another option but he is a tackle trying to learn guard and got killed when facing better competition. He is at best a 2 yr project. As for Brenner and Garner I can't see ranking either of them higher than a 3 out of 10, although at this point I see Brenner and Garner as the best two guards on the roster. That means our two backups from last year are our best two options at guard. There is no way we have upgraded EITHER guard position from this time last year, and that is disappointing.
Conclusion: Last year 7+6=13, this year 3+3=6
Overall last year tackles 10, guards 13, center wash = 23
Overall this year tackles 13, guards 6, center wash = 20

Although bullygate happened and the guards were removed, and Clabo was not up to speed til mid season and Martin was horrible and then gone, the point is there was no way to predict those things. The moves on paper to put together the OL by Philbin and Ireland had us a OL that was probably slightly better than what we have this year. No one can tell the future and maybe some of these guys pan out but as of right now we should be no more optimistic about our OL than we were this time last year.

Now FLAME AWAY. This should ruffle some feathers.
 
You have to invest in OL but reaching in the first round is not where the value is. Had this been a weak draft, and Martin or one of the other top tackles would have fallen to us I wouldn't even mind using a 1st on one, but in a draft this deep, and with the 4 2nd tier tackles so close in talent level, it made no sense to draft one in the 1st. There was a 100% chance that one of the four would have been there in the 2nd, and to be honest I think we got the worst of the bunch. Mark it down Moses will be the best all around player at the NFL level.

Serious question, what are the four RTs that can play in a ZBS that are ready to start immediately and would have been available to pick with our 2nd pick?
 
No one can tell the future and maybe some of these guys pan out but as of right now we should be no more optimistic about our OL than we were this time last year.

You can go back and read the posts from last offseason, and pretty much anyone who had a clue knew Martin and Clabo were not good OTs. So I have to disagree with this statement. Sure there were people who insisted Martin would be great (WV) and others who saw how highly Clabo was rated in PFF, but like I said...anyone who had a clue knew what we had in our OTs.
 
What I said was Hickey is not following the Ireland formula of "spending hard on the line", which is a claim someone else made in this thread.

Our 1st rd draft pick, our 3rd rd draft pick and our most expensive free agent isn't "spending hard on the line"?? Hopefully he is spending SMARTER on the OL, but I can't see where he isn't following in the footsteps of the last regime in spending pretty hard on it. I can see where some might see him as following in the footsteps. Not by design but simliar none the less. Drafting OL, drafting safe, and drafting need over BPA. Sounds a lot like Ireland to me, the only difference I see is he doesn't win the trades like Ireland did. But it's still early, he has time to turn things around, but I can't say I think he is off to a good start.
 
Our 1st rd draft pick, our 3rd rd draft pick and our most expensive free agent isn't "spending hard on the line"?? Hopefully he is spending SMARTER on the OL, but I can't see where he isn't following in the footsteps of the last regime in spending pretty hard on it.

What is it that you don't understand about how committing only $14,411,193 to the OL in 2014 is less than what 29 other teams have committed to OL?
 
You can go back and read the posts from last offseason, and pretty much anyone who had a clue knew Martin and Clabo were not good OTs. So I have to disagree with this statement. Sure there were people who insisted Martin would be great (WV) and others who saw how highly Clabo was rated in PFF, but like I said...anyone who had a clue knew what we had in our OTs.

I agree with Martin like I said in the previous post, but the vast majority on here (myself included) looked at the Clabo signing as a significant upgrade at RT. At least 5 to 2 were in favor of Clabo being the answer at RT. Just like many will overrate James this year and expect him to come in an be an upgrade this year, which is silly considering he is a rookie.
 
I agree with Martin like I said in the previous post, but the vast majority on here (myself included) looked at the Clabo signing as a significant upgrade at RT. At least 5 to 2 were in favor of Clabo being the answer at RT. Just like many will overrate James this year and expect him to come in an be an upgrade this year, which is silly considering he is a rookie.

Well the 5 to 2 ratio you claim is a reflection of another ratio: 5 people who read PFF and 2 people who watched games. I dont think its fair to rate players based on a consesus from message boards.
 
I agree with Martin like I said in the previous post, but the vast majority on here (myself included) looked at the Clabo signing as a significant upgrade at RT. At least 5 to 2 were in favor of Clabo being the answer at RT. Just like many will overrate James this year and expect him to come in an be an upgrade this year, which is silly considering he is a rookie.

Why? Fluker, Warford, Long that Center Dallas drafted were all upgrades over the players that held the positions before...
 
I give Hickey a B.

Could he have done better? Maybe, and Ju'Wuan James may not have graded out as high as the other OT's, but look at his level of competition he faced. The SEC, and not like he was On a powerhouse SEC team, he was facing Against the powerhouse SEC teams, and performed admirably well, was consistent, stayed healthy, and did his job with flying colors. He's even blocked Jedeveon Clowney. If there's any collegiate similarity to the NFL, it's an SEC defense, and James fought against them for years, AND, at the exact spot position that we need him to play, no transferring over from LT to RT. He anchored the spot and kept it going, and that was the absolute goal for Miami's RT situation, someone who can face elite players and anchor the position consistently. James was the guy after all.

I love the Landry and Hazel picks. They'll provide excellent competition for the WR's, both great hands and real playmakers. Were there better WR's available in some rounds? Definitely, but you can't deny Landry's moxie and terrific hands. He was a steal and could outperform the other taller/speedier guys from this class just from his tenacity alone.

Turner I'm a little waffling on. He's a beast, yes, but he seems too developmental for a G position we need a starter at very soon.

Lynch was also a good pickup, though I'm wondering if a power RB would have been a better choice, and allow Dion Sims to assume the blocking duties more.

Aikens is growing on me a lot. Perhaps he could have been had for cheaper, but I like the way he plays.

Tripp I think has a lot to prove; some of his plays he seems a little too soft for my liking, but if his instinctual play comes to surface, and he can be the ILB we need, he could be quite a steal.

Terrence Fede is a really nice-sounding guy from his interview, and with big measurables, I'm excited to see him push for a spot, and glad the Dolphins gave him an opportunity.
 
Just because Miami "supposedly" was the only team to grade James a 1st rounder, doesnt mean it was a reach. We're not drafting based on other teams evaluations. Thats ridiculous. Maybe some of you didnt want James(myself included) at 19, but to sit here whining about it because the media says we overdrafted or other teams is head scratching. Are we so weak-willed, and cautious about what another person, message board, espn analyst or team that we turn our head on our beloved franchise just because they look down on us.


Man **** the other 31 teams and their opinions. I could care less. Same goes for fans abroad, and beat writers, and scouts or whoever. Im always going to support my franchise, even if I dont see their plan the way they do. I swear, the past couple days on this forum I'd think I was on a division rivals website....I even had to take a break from here. This teams had enough negativity, and its crazy how effected some fans are from it.
 
My grade is an I for inconclusive. How are we really supposed to grade a bunch of players nobody has seen play in the NFL? I feel we reached maybe a little bit but if they really like James it was the right move. I like most people on this board like the wr we got in the second. Exactly what we needed, a strong receiver that can win one on one battles. Bout damn time! Lol. So sick of our wideouts always needing to be wide open to make a play.

Sent from my RM-917_nam_usa_100 using Tapatalk
 
I give Hickey a B.

Could he have done better? Maybe, and Ju'Wuan James may not have graded out as high as the other OT's, but look at his level of competition he faced. The SEC, and not like he was On a powerhouse SEC team, he was facing Against the powerhouse SEC teams, and performed admirably well, was consistent, stayed healthy, and did his job with flying colors. He's even blocked Jedeveon Clowney. If there's any collegiate similarity to the NFL, it's an SEC defense, and James fought against them for years, AND, at the exact spot position that we need him to play, no transferring over from LT to RT. He anchored the spot and kept it going, and that was the absolute goal for Miami's RT situation, someone who can face elite players and anchor the position consistently. James was the guy after all.

I love the Landry and Hazel picks. They'll provide excellent competition for the WR's, both great hands and real playmakers. Were there better WR's available in some rounds? Definitely, but you can't deny Landry's moxie and terrific hands. He was a steal and could outperform the other taller/speedier guys from this class just from his tenacity alone.

Turner I'm a little waffling on. He's a beast, yes, but he seems too developmental for a G position we need a starter at very soon.

Lynch was also a good pickup, though I'm wondering if a power RB would have been a better choice, and allow Dion Sims to assume the blocking duties more.

Aikens is growing on me a lot. Perhaps he could have been had for cheaper, but I like the way he plays.

Tripp I think has a lot to prove; some of his plays he seems a little too soft for my liking, but if his instinctual play comes to surface, and he can be the ILB we need, he could be quite a steal.

Terrence Fede is a really nice-sounding guy from his interview, and with big measurables, I'm excited to see him push for a spot, and glad the Dolphins gave him an opportunity.

Tripp will make it. Don't worry about that. He's got natural athleticism and instincts. He will be good on special teams but might crack it as a starter. He's an absolute steal.
I don't know much about Aikens. What has he done to make him grow on you? He's the only one with character concerns and comes across as a bit of a punk.
 
Lynch was also a good pickup, though I'm wondering if a power RB would have been a better choice, and allow Dion Sims to assume the blocking duties more.


And right there is the problem I had with these selections...we need someone who can get us a yard or 2 on 3rd and 1. None of the slugs on the current roster I would trust to do so. Maybe a free agent signing is coming, but I was perplexed when I saw the final day with no power back selected.
 
Back
Top Bottom