Greenberg says Manning to SEA, Edwards says MIA | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Greenberg says Manning to SEA, Edwards says MIA

BB w/o Brady(7+ seasons):

51-62, 45%
1 playoff app
1 playoff win
zero div titles
zero div rd wins
zero AFC tile game apps
Zero SBs
2 winning seasons
5 losing seasons

BB w/ Brady(10 seasons):

124-35, 78%

9 playoff apps
9 div titles
16-6 postseason record
5 AFC Titles
3 SB titles
5 6 AFC title game apps
no losing seasons
only one season w/ lesss than 10 wins
 
. Greenberg then gave his opinion, the whiny little tart, about how Seattle would be a much better fit, and that it doesn't make sense for Manning to play under a first year head coach in Philbin.

Of course Greenie is saying "Manning is likely going to Seattle....he is a Jet's fan and doesn't want Manning killing his team. For what it is worth, Skip Bayless said, "The Phins are on the rise and he felt Manning would likely end up in Miami." But Greenie, Bayless and even Herm Edwards know about as much as where he is going as you and I. They are not insiders. They're just guessing like everyone else.
 
Don't buy the Favre injury excuse, he could throw the ball just fine in December and he supposedly got hurt in noctober then played his best football in November(his onl;y good stretch of football for us all year). We were 8-3 more b/c of an incredibly weak schedule.

I saw a lot of Jets games that year, you could see his arm strength get worse each week. That 08 Jets won 9 games and beat:

11-5 NE
11-5 Miami
13-3 Titans (Made it to the AFCC game)
9-7 Cardinals (NFC Champs)

The 09 Jets were a joke in the regular season with the biggest win being against 10-6 NE (in the second game of the season) That NE team would later get pummeled in the playoffs by Bal. They lost 6 of 7 at one point, and Indy gave them the game. The 09 Jets couldn't even beat teams like 7-9 Miami, 7-9 Jacksonville, 6-10 Buff, and with the playoffs on the line, 9-7 Atlanta. There was no way they were going to beat the undefeated Colts had they kept their starters in. It was a 9-3 Colts lead at the half. The Jets got back in the game with a kick off return for a TD. Manning came back in for 1 drive and they scored a TD giving them the 15-10 lead. Then they quit. Painter came in and on his first pass attempt, gives the Jets 7. At that point, not just Manning, but all of the starters were out. I know you are going to bring up the playoff game and say they were leading by 4 at the half, but games are 4 quarters, not 2. Indy went on to win 30-17. There is no way that team would have beat Indy had they kept their starters in.


It was just a coincidence that NE was 5-11 in 2000 w/o Brady then started 0-2 in 2001 w/o him before winning 11 of 14 w/ Brady. The 2001 Pats wouldn't have made the playoffs let alone win a SB if Brady didn't take over, BB wouldn't have had a job much longer.

BB w/o Brady(7+ seasons):

51-62, 45%
1 playoff app
1 playoff win
zero div titles
zero div rd wins
zero AFC tile game apps
Zero SBs
2 winning seasons
5 losing seasons

BB w/ Brady(10 seasons):

What do you base that on? An 0-2 start after a 5-11 season the year before? Parcells had an almost identical 6-10 record and started out 0-2 in 96 and not only made the playoffs, but went to the Super Bowl.

Bledsoe did it before in 96 against tougher competition, and he could have done it again in 01 against easier competition.

Brady didn't play like the Brady we know today in 01. That team was carried by the D and special teams and didn't have a very tough schedule. In 2001 they faced 10 teams with a losing record. The Dolphins, Jets and the Rams were the only teams they faced that had a record above .500. They split with the Dolphins and Jets, and lost to the Rams.

Brady won his first start against the 6-10 Colts. He lost his next start to the 11-5 Dolphins. His next 2 games were against the 5-11 Chargers, and the 6-10 Colts again. He lost to the 8-8 Broncos before beating the 7-9 Falcons and the 3-13 Bills. He also beat the 7-9 Saints, the 7-9 Browns, the 3-13 Bills again, and the 1-15 Panthers. You can't tell me that it is not possible that Bledsoe could have had the same success against those weak teams.

What does Bill's record in the 90's with a different team have to do with Brady? It was a completely different team. His record without Brady in 08 is the only thing that we have as a fair comparison. Yes, belichick went 5-11 in 2000, but that was his first year, and they were only 8-8 in the previous season.
 
It's definitely Brady. In recent years Brady has been more Manning like in postseason but he still has the edge. Manning was getting close, if he wouldn't have thrown away the SB 2 years ago and would have staye dhealthy he could have caught and maybe passed Brady but Brady is easily the best of this generation. it sucks to say that since we have seen him beat both our teams and dominate our division but to me it's not that close.

That made no sense !!! You just said because manning lost a superbowl and didnt stay healthy, he couldn't surpass brady, so brady is easily the better of the two. Too often you resort to either bringing up the past, or ignoring it... which ever suits your antagonistic side of the arguments. But still. your efforts remain comical and we appreciate that.

A real argument you could make, if you really came to share insight and not push buttons....... would be to say this :

The greatest QB of a generation ? Even if that were true.... what makes you think he can ever play at that level again ? And even if he does... one hit can possibly paralyze him. Did you see him in 2010 before the surgeries ? You clammer that the greatest may be coming to your team but in reality your wasting time chasing a washed up - has-been, when miami needs to draft and develop a franchise quarterback for once. Hell, it worked last time.... but that was 28 years agooooo................ woooooaaaahhhhhh !
 
Really? Peyton's D in 2006 allowed 12.8 PPG in 4 playoff games, Peyton threw 3 TDs and 7 INTs, Addai & rhodes rushed for 600 yds on 4.4 YPC. That certainly shows Peyton winning w/o much help from the D or run game.

In NE's 3 SBs runs the D allowed an average of:

2001: 15.7 PPG, good but not as good as '06 Indy
2003: 19 PPG
2004: 17 PPG

NE run game:

2001: Antowain Smith averaged 3.8 YPC in playoffs
2003: Smith averaged 3.9 YPC
2004: Dillon averaged 4.5

You do remember how the Patriots won their games in their SB years, right? All their games were very close, most of the responsibilty was on Brady to drive them close enough for Vinatieri to do most of the scoring, then allow the defense to win the games. Manning took the team on his shoulders, Actually scored multiple TDs in many games to win on his own.

NE was a sinking franchise until Brady took over and rescued it.

You mean the same Pats team that had been to the SB a few years earlier, the one that had another franchise QB there by the name of Bledsoe? No, the thing that had the Pats playing horrible was their HC problem, and 4 years later when Belichik took over, they were a different team. I would have to say it's more of a combination of a great QB (Brady) w/ a Great HC, but if the Patriots had Manning.....it would have been unfair.

Brady went down a year after winning 16 games and despite a much easier sched they only won 10 w/ Cassel as their starter and MISSED the playoffs. Indy was a team ont he decline and went from 10 to 2 wins when the team quit on the season and didn't have a competent QB.

But Cassell was able to win those games, and thanks to Cassell, the Patriots after thier big season, still won 11 games without Brady. The Colts schedule was not much harder, yet they could only get 2 wins out of it. Brady is a great QB, but he is not Payton, and if Miami gets a healthy Payton, not only will it be a nightmare for Greenberg and you, but Brady will have to look forward to seeing Manning on the team that beat his team the most in the 2000 decade....that in itself will be fun.
 
I saw a lot of Jets games that year, you could see his arm strength get worse each week. That 08 Jets won 9 games and beat:

11-5 NE
11-5 Miami
13-3 Titans (Made it to the AFCC game)
9-7 Cardinals (NFC Champs)

The 09 Jets were a joke in the regular season with the biggest win being against 10-6 NE (in the second game of the season) That NE team would later get pummeled in the playoffs by Bal. They lost 6 of 7 at one point, and Indy gave them the game. The 09 Jets couldn't even beat teams like 7-9 Miami, 7-9 Jacksonville, 6-10 Buff, and with the playoffs on the line, 9-7 Atlanta. There was no way they were going to beat the undefeated Colts had they kept their starters in. It was a 9-3 Colts lead at the half. The Jets got back in the game with a kick off return for a TD. Manning came back in for 1 drive and they scored a TD giving them the 15-10 lead. Then they quit. Painter came in and on his first pass attempt, gives the Jets 7. At that point, not just Manning, but all of the starters were out. I know you are going to bring up the playoff game and say they were leading by 4 at the half, but games are 4 quarters, not 2. Indy went on to win 30-17. There is no way that team would have beat Indy had they kept their starters in.




What do you base that on? An 0-2 start after a 5-11 season the year before? Parcells had an almost identical 6-10 record and started out 0-2 in 96 and not only made the playoffs, but went to the Super Bowl.

Bledsoe did it before in 96 against tougher competition, and he could have done it again in 01 against easier competition.

Brady didn't play like the Brady we know today in 01. That team was carried by the D and special teams and didn't have a very tough schedule. In 2001 they faced 10 teams with a losing record. The Dolphins, Jets and the Rams were the only teams they faced that had a record above .500. They split with the Dolphins and Jets, and lost to the Rams.

Brady won his first start against the 6-10 Colts. He lost his next start to the 11-5 Dolphins. His next 2 games were against the 5-11 Chargers, and the 6-10 Colts again. He lost to the 8-8 Broncos before beating the 7-9 Falcons and the 3-13 Bills. He also beat the 7-9 Saints, the 7-9 Browns, the 3-13 Bills again, and the 1-15 Panthers. You can't tell me that it is not possible that Bledsoe could have had the same success against those weak teams.

What does Bill's record in the 90's with a different team have to do with Brady? It was a completely different team. His record without Brady in 08 is the only thing that we have as a fair comparison. Yes, belichick went 5-11 in 2000, but that was his first year, and they were only 8-8 in the previous season.

I saw every single throw he made and he was struggling late in the year b/c of poor decision making moreso than any physical limitation. Again, he supposedly injured the arm in october and played his best football in November.

beat the cassel led Pats
a medicore Miami team that took advantage of a weak sched
The Titan win was a really good win but that was the end of the season.
The Cards were awful travelling across Country.

The '09 jets would have beaten the '08 jets easily, Favre would have turned it over 3-4 times. We had a big time D in 2009, we didn't have that in '08. We had QBs turning it over at a hig rate in both years but one was a rookie and one a future HOFer. We were better all around in 2009 and in '09 we beat SD on the road int he div rd- a win MUCH better than any in 2008.

Games are 4 qtrs long and we trailed by just 5 midway through the 3rd.

What do I base it on? watching that team play. A team that lost in week 1 to a bad Bengal team then lost to us in week 2 when we didn't play well. I saw a change in that team the instant Brady stepped on the field, they never scored but they started moving the ball and w/ the statue Bledasoe back there they maybe win 7 games that year.

The scheds were similar, they played a game or twop more that was difficult but they were 1-2 against playoff bound teams losing by an average of 16 PPG, in '01 they lost to eventual NFC champ SL by 7. In postseason they got lucky that 1 seed Den got picked off and played a 2nd yr expansion team in the title game at home. In '01 they had to face a really good Oakland team in the div rd then face the #1 seed on the road.

and Curtis Martin carried Bledsoe. In 3 playoff games Bledsoe threw 3 TDs and 7 INTs(sounds familiar) while Curtis averaged 5.4 YPC

Brady was not the great QB he is today but he limited mistakes and made big plays to win games. It's amazing how everyone thought the OL sucked in '00 and early '01 then Brady comes in and the Ol is all of sudden good b/c he makes qucik decisions and doesn't hold onto the ball looking for big plays like Bledsoe always did.

Indy wound up 6-10 but Indy was supposed to be a big time team and Indy was 2-0 heading into that game. Their season fell apart b/c of some injuries.

In week 1 Bledsoe lost to the 6-10 Bengals, in 2000 Bledsoe lost to the 3-13 Browns, 5-11 Bears

W/ NE he hasn't had Brady for 2 full seasons and they missed the playoffs both times, w/ Brady he made it 9 of 10 years and missed once on a tiebreaker.

Is 5-11 worse than 8-8? again, they started 0-2 in 2001 before Brady rescued BB's HC career and that franchise.

That made no sense !!! You just said because manning lost a superbowl and didnt stay healthy, he couldn't surpass brady, so brady is easily the better of the two. Too often you resort to either bringing up the past, or ignoring it... which ever suits your antagonistic side of the arguments. But still. your efforts remain comical and we appreciate that.

A real argument you could make, if you really came to share insight and not push buttons....... would be to say this :

The greatest QB of a generation ? Even if that were true.... what makes you think he can ever play at that level again ? And even if he does... one hit can possibly paralyze him. Did you see him in 2010 before the surgeries ? You clammer that the greatest may be coming to your team but in reality your probably wasting time chasing a washed up - has-been, when miami needs to draft and develop a franchise quarterback for once. Hell, it worked last time.... but that was 28 years agooooo !

How does it make no sense? Peyton threw away a SUPER BOWL. He was getting close to Brady and if he could have played well and led his team to a 2nd SB win he would have been really close but combining throwing away the SB then missing a season late in his career and not knowing if he will ever be the same has created much more distance btw the two.
 
You do remember how the Patriots won their games in their SB years, right? All their games were very close, most of the responsibilty was on Brady to drive them close enough for Vinatieri to do most of the scoring, then allow the defense to win the games. Manning took the team on his shoulders, Actually scored multiple TDs in many games to win on his own.



You mean the same Pats team that had been to the SB a few years earlier, the one that had another franchise QB there by the name of Bledsoe? No, the thing that had the Pats playing horrible was their HC problem, and 4 years later when Belichik took over, they were a different team. I would have to say it's more of a combination of a great QB (Brady) w/ a Great HC, but if the Patriots had Manning.....it would have been unfair.



But Cassell was able to win those games, and thanks to Cassell, the Patriots after thier big season, still won 11 games without Brady. The Colts schedule was not much harder, yet they could only get 2 wins out of it. Brady is a great QB, but he is not Payton, and if Miami gets a healthy Payton, not only will it be a nightmare for Greenberg and you, but Brady will have to look forward to seeing Manning on the team that beat his team the most in the 2000 decade....that in itself will be fun.

Yep, they played many close games meaning the QB had to execute in critical situations. If they relied on the D to win games they would only have 1 SB title instead of 3(and should be 5 if not for the D blowing 2 SBs).

lead his O to multiple TDs? Manning did? Like when he was SHUT OUT by the Jets? how about when he led his O to 3 pts against the Pats? How about leading thos high powered O's to an average of 14 PPG in 10 playoff losses? The fewest amount of points a Brady led O score din postseason was 13 points or 13 more than the fewest Manning ever led his Os to.

Yes the same franchise that had been to the Super Bowl in 1996- 5 years before Brady took over.

1996 Pats 11-5
1997 10-6
1998 9-7
1999 8-8
2000 5-11
2001 start w/o Brady 0-2

Noticing a trend here?

They won 6 less games w/ Cassell as the starter as they did the year before w/ Brady as the starter against an incredibly weak sched.

I hope Miami sinks their future into manning, when was healthy, in his prime and had much better talent around him he still only made 2 SBs so he wouldn't be scaring NE or us if he went to Miami.
 
Last I checked the Pats were just in the SB and those Pats Ds were not great defenses and the Colts Ds were very underrated. The Colts Ds have allowed less postseason pts than the supposed great NE D's. Indy has lost more b/c of the play of the QB in January than the defense.

yes they were but FACT is they haven't won a thing since spygate.. manning in his prime was definatley a better QB that Brady.. I live in NY to and theres much talk here about Jets going after manning so of course your going to downplay him.. You like all jet fans would cry a river if a healthy manning wound up in Miami..
 
yes they were but FACT is they haven't won a thing since spygate.. manning in his prime was definatley a better QB that Brady.. I live in NY to and theres much talk here about Jets going after manning so of course your going to downplay him.. You like all jet fans would cry a river if a healthy manning wound up in Miami..



Come on bro, could there be any credibility in someone who claims the Jets are "set at QB tor a decade"?? I wouldn't worry about trying to respond to him. All you'll do is give him another excuse to post here and repeat what he has continued to repeat in just about every thread. He'll always find a way to downplay anything the Dolphins do and hype up the Jets moves. He is the definition of a blind homer....
 
beat the cassel led Pats
a medicore Miami team that took advantage of a weak sched
The Titan win was a really good win but that was the end of the season.
The Cards were awful travelling across Country.

The '09 jets would have beaten the '08 jets easily, Favre would have turned it over 3-4 times. We had a big time D in 2009, we didn't have that in '08. We had QBs turning it over at a hig rate in both years but one was a rookie and one a future HOFer. We were better all around in 2009 and in '09 we beat SD on the road int he div rd- a win MUCH better than any in 2008.

Show me all the big wins they had in the 09 regular season. The win against Tenn alone was better than any win in 09. The 08 Jets won the same amount of games and the 08 Jets didn't get to play any teams that didn't care about winning.


What do I base it on? watching that team play. A team that lost in week 1 to a bad Bengal team then lost to us in week 2 when we didn't play well. I saw a change in that team the instant Brady stepped on the field, they never scored but they started moving the ball and w/ the statue Bledasoe back there they maybe win 7 games that year.

The scheds were similar, they played a game or twop more that was difficult but they were 1-2 against playoff bound teams losing by an average of 16 PPG, in '01 they lost to eventual NFC champ SL by 7. In postseason they got lucky that 1 seed Den got picked off and played a 2nd yr expansion team in the title game at home. In '01 they had to face a really good Oakland team in the div rd then face the #1 seed on the road.

Let's be fair. A 9-7 team is a 9-7 team whether they make the playoffs or not. The 96 Pats beat 6 teams that were .500 or better. The 01 Pats beat 2 teams that were better than .500 The fact is the 01 Pats had and easier schedule with wins against:

6-10 Colts
5-11 Chargers
6-10 Colts again
7-9 Falcons
3-13 Bills

7-9 Saints
7-9 Browns
3-13 Bills
1-15 Panthers


And you talk about the 08 Dolphins having it easy. :chuckle: The competition in the playoffs was better in 01, but the 96 Pats beat their playoff opponents by a combined score of 48-9.

and Curtis Martin carried Bledsoe. In 3 playoff games Bledsoe threw 3 TDs and 7 INTs(sounds familiar) while Curtis averaged 5.4 YPCn

I never said Bledsoe didn't have help. Just pointed out that he had been to the Super Bowl before and with the schedule they had in 01 combined with the way the D and ST played, he could have done it again. The Curtis Martin average is a little skewed since he had a 78 yard rush and a 23 yard rush against the Steelers that boost that average quite a bit. In the regular season, the 96 Pats and 01 Pats got almost identical production from their starting backs. Martin rushed for 1,152 yards on a 3.6 Y/A and 14 TDs. Smith rushed for 1,157 yards on a 4.0 Y/A and 12 TDs.

If Bledsoe was carried by Martin then you have to see that Brady was carried by the D and special teams. It held Oakland to just 13 points in the divisional playoff game, yet if it was not for the tuck rule, they would have still lost.

The next game against the Steelers the defense allowed 17 points. They intercepted 3 passes and held the Steelers running backs to 19 total yards.

Brady got injured late in the first half of that game and before the injury, he lead the offense to 0 points. Drew Bledsoe came in and lead the team to its only offensive touchdown of the game. In addition to the TD pass, Bledsoe put the Patriots in position for a 4th quarter field goal. The other scores came from a punt return and a blocked field goal returned for a touchdown.


In week 1 Bledsoe lost to the 6-10 Bengals, in 2000 Bledsoe lost to the 3-13 Browns, 5-11 Bears

So? In 96 he lost to the 8-8 Dolphins and started 0-2 and then went on to make it to the Super Bowl.


W/ NE he hasn't had Brady for 2 full seasons and they missed the playoffs both times, w/ Brady he made it 9 of 10 years and missed once on a tiebreaker.

Did they not miss out on the playoffs on a tie breaker in 08 without Brady? The only other season without Brady was Belichik's first season as the Pats head coach.


Is 5-11 worse than 8-8? again, they started 0-2 in 2001 before Brady rescued BB's HC career and that franchise.

Yes, 5-11 is worse than 8-8, but it is not that far off and that was his first season with them. Kevin Faulk was the leading rusher with a little over 500 yards on the season. It is not uncommon for a new head coach to have a worse season than the team had the previous year.
 
both brady and manning are amazing...the difference between the two is like choosing between a ferrari and a lamborghini ..nyjunk is just doing pre damage control in case we actually get him

he also already has some positive henne stats and points to bring up when they sign him and he competes with sanchez to be the starter
 
Back
Top Bottom