Greg Cote: Tannehill doesn’t need to be great — just consistently good | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Greg Cote: Tannehill doesn’t need to be great — just consistently good

dolpns13 said:
It actually wasn't his best game as a pro.. We all know, yourself included no matter how much you want to deny it, that he's had and is capable of having better. At the minimum however he needs to be consistent, and that he definitely is not.

---------- Post added at 09:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 PM ----------


This is true
Click to expand...
i dont think calling yesterdays game his best game as a pro to date is a knock on tannehill.

yesterday he was as sharp as u can be, firing on all cylinders, getting rid of the ball quickly, hitting ppl with accuracy, and most importantly, translating to pts on the scoreboard.

whether u think it was his best overall game or not to date is another thing, but calling yesterdays game his best game to date is not a knock by any means on tannehill, he was very very good.

he plays like that, we win division easy this year
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
wtf does matt ryan have to do with this?

we know wv is a matt ryan fan, which is fine, but he never mentioned matt ryan in this post, just simply made a comment on the article by greg cote, yet the only thing u can think of is matt ryan?

did greg cote say something wrong in this article, or should he have said tannehill can continue to be up and down and everything will be ok?

cotes article sums it up perfectly, and he also gives u stats of how when tannys qb rating is above a certain level, we are basically unbeatable, 90 was the rating i believe.
Click to expand...

How do you give him **** for bringing up Matt Ryan but when Matt Moore is brought up you don't say anything? Also, Greg Cote didn't say anything wrong in the article. It was WV's comments which were dolt-like.
 
SpurzN703 said:
How do you give him **** for bringing up Matt Ryan but when Matt Moore is brought up you don't say anything? Also, Greg Cote didn't say anything wrong in the article. It was WV's comments which were dolt-like.
Click to expand...

when wv brought up matt moore, he was saying how even someone like matt moore has had a few elite type games in his career, comparing our backup qb to our starting qb.

if moore was on the titans and he brought up moore, id also say, wtf is matt moore being brought up.

matt moore is a dolphin, ryan is not, because we unfortunately took ****ing jake long with the 1 pick that year, but that has been discussed time and time again.
 
The 2nd quarter stats would have looked a lot better if that TD had held instead of being called back. It likely would have wiped away the INT too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
when wv brought up matt moore, he was saying how even someone like matt moore has had a few elite type games in his career, comparing our backup qb to our starting qb.

if moore was on the titans and he brought up moore, id also say, wtf is matt moore being brought up.

matt moore is a dolphin, ryan is not, because we unfortunately took ****ing jake long with the 1 pick that year, but that has been discussed time and time again.
Click to expand...

Are you WV's slightly less dickish alter ego?
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
when wv brought up matt moore, he was saying how even someone like matt moore has had a few elite type games in his career, comparing our backup qb to our starting qb.

if moore was on the titans and he brought up moore, id also say, wtf is matt moore being brought up.

matt moore is a dolphin, ryan is not, because we unfortunately took ****ing jake long with the 1 pick that year, but that has been discussed time and time again.
Click to expand...

Neither QB has anything to do with Tannehill
 
SkapePhin said:
The 2nd quarter stats would have looked a lot better if that TD had held instead of being called back. It likely would have wiped away the TD too.
Click to expand...

This is the point I made in the thread I created earlier today about the Sims PI that took the pass away. I knew someone would complain Tannehill's stats weren't better.
 
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Now, let me see, why would we have a better record when the offense plays better..... Hmmmm......why, oh, why would that be?

Are you serious with this stuff?
Click to expand...

wtf does this mean.

do you have mental ****ing problems? u seem like a very angry person, maybe u should get off the boards and get help.

its only when i am on finheaven that a few ppl seem to not understand that a team will go as the qb goes.

there will not be a season in which tannehill plays great and we miss the playoffs, i can gurantee u that. his first 2 seasons have been avg at best, that is why we finished with avg records.

its amazing i can speak to intelligent ppl at my office, friends who understand football, random ppl i meet at bars, or whereever, and not get so stressed talking about simple concepts of football, yet with u, u try to make everything so literal.

when/ if u read season previews for teams, what is the most talked about player on that team usually? is it the ****ing right guard, or is the qb, that will be main factor whether a team has success in a season or not?

obviously it goes without saying everything must click, but it starts at the top with the qb, why is that so ****ing hard to comprehend

---------- Post added at 08:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Are you WV's slightly less dickish alter ego?
Click to expand...

yes
 
Cote is correct. Many of us have been shouting this from the roof tops. Yes ... WV included.

I really don't see what there is to argue about. Tannehill is terribly inconsistent. If you believe he has only played well in 1 or 2 games this season, we're looking at 25% TO 50% of the time. That's simply not going to cut it. The problem is, if you look back at his career to date, I bet the ratio is about the same, or worse.

A team can not be successful when their QB is consistent 50% of the time. That, by definition is inconsistent ... unless of course you want to maintain that he's consistently inconsistent, in which case you may have a valid point.

The bottom line is that for Tannehill to be good enough to consistently win games, he has to play consistently well, a consistent amount of the time - a feat that thus far has eluded him. This really is as simple as it gets.

By the way, the same can be said for this coaching staff, WR's, OL, RB's and LB's.
 
SpurzN703 said:
Neither QB has anything to do with Tannehill
Click to expand...

well 1 of those qbs, whether it was just a scare tactic or the coach was seriously considering a change, was the one involved in that scare tactic to replace tanny, and the other qb has nothing whatsoever to do with miami.

whatever dude, i see ur a mod, i dont want any problems, if u want i will totally ignore ffib, truth is it would be better for myself to do so.
 
Swap Tannehill with Brady and we take the AFC east in a cake walk. Can't believe this is what Belly is giving him to work with.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
i dont think calling yesterdays game his best game as a pro to date is a knock on tannehill.

yesterday he was as sharp as u can be, firing on all cylinders, getting rid of the ball quickly, hitting ppl with accuracy, and most importantly, translating to pts on the scoreboard.

whether u think it was his best overall game or not to date is another thing, but calling yesterdays game his best game to date is not a knock by any means on tannehill, he was very very good.

he plays like that, we win division easy this year
Click to expand...
I agree however you have to consider the source.. Read my past threads about RT. I used to be a supporter but I realize this year he has regressed significantly and am very critical now. With that being said I am still unbiased. WV however is completely biased because even he knows yesterday was not his best game, but feels the need to go opposite of what he knows and it hurts his credibility. Even the biggest Tannehill hater knows he has performed better than what we saw yesterday... Which again shows that Tannehill is wildly inconsistent and needs to play more like he did yesterday.. And If he does we go to the playoffs. You hit the nail on the head with that one.
 
dolpns13 said:
I agree however you have to consider the source.. Read my past threads about RT. I used to be a supporter but I realize this year he has regressed significantly and am very critical now. With that being said I am still unbiased. WV however is completely biased because even he knows yesterday was not his best game, but feels the need to go opposite of what he knows and it hurts his credibility. Even the biggest Tannehill hater knows he has performed better than what we saw yesterday... Which again shows that Tannehill is wildly inconsistent and needs to play more like he did yesterday.. And If he does we go to the playoffs. You hit the nail on the head with that one.
Click to expand...
at least u r smart enough to comprehend if the qb plays well, like yesterday, we easily make the playoffs, unlike some other dude who whenever i bring up that simple concept, will always make it not about the qb, despite being by far the most important position on an nfl team, and will bring up everything else but.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom