Wow! I didn't know my "Moneyball" reference was going to be so controversial. I am not implying this is anything like that. In fact, I'm sure it's just like some have indicated as a modified data processer/smart screen. All the data that's in there has to be fed in by our coaches and scouts (which are going to be personal/professional opinions) about certain capabilities/skills. Something to give the war room the ability to pull up the BPA, the best "position x players" available, upcoming needs for other teams, etc. etc. All these things normally would take a small army to keep track of and get to them in a couple of minutes, so this will do it easier and faster so they can make the best choice available to them, not just what is next on our written checklist of needs. I like it, as it gives them the ability to be flexible and go with the best choice, not the expected choice.
My only point on the "Moneyball" comment was that this could be something that may lead to that down the road (not necessarily for us, but someone). Why? Well despite football in the past being different than baseball, where baseball has stats for anything and everything, and can tie it to individual play. But football was always such a team sport where a guys play was always part of a team or system, so stats could be misleading. However, we all know that they've starting breaking down all types of individual plays/stats now where they never did before for recognition, awards, contract justification, etc. . Heck there are guys that give stats to linemen on what happened with every play on blocking. If the trend continues to statisically track these things, including probabilities of a guy getting in trouble off-the-field (since that's the latest woes of many teams), to fit in schemes, to fit with teammates; somebody eventually will try and market that into the football version of "moneyball".
(If anyone on here ends up doing that based on my idea, please remember me with at least some small royalties.)
My only point on the "Moneyball" comment was that this could be something that may lead to that down the road (not necessarily for us, but someone). Why? Well despite football in the past being different than baseball, where baseball has stats for anything and everything, and can tie it to individual play. But football was always such a team sport where a guys play was always part of a team or system, so stats could be misleading. However, we all know that they've starting breaking down all types of individual plays/stats now where they never did before for recognition, awards, contract justification, etc. . Heck there are guys that give stats to linemen on what happened with every play on blocking. If the trend continues to statisically track these things, including probabilities of a guy getting in trouble off-the-field (since that's the latest woes of many teams), to fit in schemes, to fit with teammates; somebody eventually will try and market that into the football version of "moneyball".
(If anyone on here ends up doing that based on my idea, please remember me with at least some small royalties.)