hoops
Tua time!
I think it's a bit more than that hoops, otherwise anybody with a good QB and a handful of Al Pacino quotes could be a good head coach. Sparano did a nice job coming in and motivating a bunch of players who had given up to work hard and get rewarded with a championship game. But he was very limited strategically, he was behind the curve on the evolution of the game and his motivational box of tricks got pretty stale pretty quickly. He had a pathological love of fieldgoals too.
Philbin is a guy who does everything Sparano couldn't do. He is the anti-Sparano (apart from the o-line coaching origins). He's the planner in the coaching hierarchy - the strategist. He has put a huge amount of effort into structuring what goes on off the field to maximise performance on it. He is the guy looking at the development of the sport and where opportunities exist to exploit that development. There is no question in my mind that he is NOT going to slavishly try to replicate the Packers in Miami.
He's also quite ballsy - something Sparano definitely wasn't. Sparano would never have started Tannehill in Game 1. Sparano wouldn't have let Bush go in the offseason. Sparano wouldn't have tried the fake punt, the onside kick, the (unsuccessful) fake field goal, the 2-point conversions. I say that knowing Sherman did the playcalling (in its own way a ballsy decision by Philbin).
Hopefully, with this approach we win more. Because then, success will beget confidence and more success. In that version of events, there's less reliance on "rah, rah, rah" style motivation and it's more about a culture of performance.
Where I have a reservation about Philbin is if we don't win as much as we want. We have two fairly reserved, cerebral leaders in Philbin and Tannehill - neither of which are inspirational figures in the stereotypical sense. If the wheels come off in some way (injury, bad luck, poor play) Philbin better hope Sherman and Coyle and Turner and Rogers and Campbell and O'Keefe all fill the motivational void and get guys fired up.
So, for the long run, I am pretty confident we have one of the right guys. If we get a prolonged dip in the short run, Philbin might need to lean on a few guys so that he's still around for the long-run.
well sure...when you compare it to sparano it is a lot more than that...but sparano shouldn't have been coaching even a little league football team...and let's face it he never had a real qb to win over the long haul with...i thought for a long time sparano just played for field goals and yeah he did no question at times play it way too conservative and his ocs well they sucked...daboll and the other dinosaur sucked...sparano and the o had a play not to lose mindset...but i also think looking back and the more i studied henne as his time got shorter here that a lot of the red zone woes and inability to get in the end zone were on the qb also...henne had/has a lot of weaknesses that were exploited while he was here...
as for being a real good head coach or being perceived as one it's an awful lot about finding yourself a qb and him playing big for you...ie dungy in indy with peyton manning...you pretty much just have to get out of the way when you have a top qb...let him do his work...know the offense is in good hands and focus on other things...and you also get the luxury of knowing that you'll be in the playoff hunt year in and year out with that qb...