It's a long season | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

It's a long season

67Stang

67Stang

Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2004
Messages
9,812
Reaction score
6,050
Location
Tucson, AZ
It cracks me up reading some of the posts and Tannehill sucks, play Matt Moore when we just played the 2nd game of the season with a new offense with 5 new starters on the O-line and our best running back gets hurt on the first play. People are already jumping ship, it is freaking ridiculous! Just a quick reminder of some other QBs and their teams records thus far.

Matt Ryan (his performance made Tanne's look like an MVP) 1-1
Russel Wilson 1-1
Drew Brees 0-2
Tom Brady 1-1
Andrew Luck 0-2
Aaron Rodgers 1-1

I am sure these guys and teams are really freaking out.....they should be benched! We should trade Matt Moore to one of them because he has to be a better QB. Some of the posts on here are just sad! This team will get better and better, especially after we get our players back and the O-Line starts to gel and we get the offense down!
 
With Tannehill at QB, its definitely a LONG season.
 
How is that Matt Ryan winning a SB in 5 years guarantee going? It has been a long 5 years!
 
67Stang said:
It cracks me up reading some of the posts and Tannehill sucks, play Matt Moore when we just played the 2nd game of the season with a new offense with 5 new starters on the O-line and our best running back gets hurt on the first play. People are already jumping ship, it is freaking ridiculous! Just a quick reminder of some other QBs and their teams records thus far.

Matt Ryan (his performance made Tanne's look like an MVP) 1-1
Russel Wilson 1-1
Drew Brees 0-2
Tom Brady 1-1
Andrew Luck 0-2
Aaron Rodgers 1-1

I am sure these guys and teams are really freaking out.....they should be benched! We should trade Matt Moore to one of them because he has to be a better QB. Some of the posts on here are just sad! This team will get better and better, especially after we get our players back and the O-Line starts to gel and we get the offense down!
Click to expand...

all those qbs, 4 have won superbowls, and the other 2, matt ryan has had 1 losing season and made the playoffs on several occasions, and luck in 2 full seasons has been in the playoffs 2x.

tannehill is nowhere near any of those guys, its really not even close. heck, hes not near andy dalton, a guy many ppl on this board talk crap about
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
all those qbs, 4 have won superbowls, and the other 2, matt ryan has had 1 losing season and made the playoffs on several occasions, and luck in 2 full seasons has been in the playoffs 2x.

tannehill is nowhere near any of those guys, its really not even close. heck, hes not near andy dalton, a guy many ppl on this board talk crap about
Click to expand...

Their Teams won the SB and that doesn't have anything to do with this year. They have the same record (or worse) as us and in many cases worse games than Tanne had against Buffalo.
 
67Stang said:
Their Teams won the SB and that doesn't have anything to do with this year. They have the same record (or worse) as us and in many cases worse games than Tanne had against Buffalo.
Click to expand...

bringing up other teams records through 2 games is a joke.

the best a team can be obviously through 2 games i 2-0, and 0-2 is the worst. so the best and worst team in the nfl can only be separated at this point by 2 games.

lets see how close tannehill has the fins near the elite teams come week 10
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
bringing up other teams records through 2 games is a joke.

the best a team can be obviously through 2 games i 2-0, and 0-2 is the worst. so the best and worst team in the nfl can only be separated at this point by 2 games.

lets see how close tannehill has the fins near the elite teams come week 10
Click to expand...

Exactly it is ridiculous "after 2 games"! My point exactly! Thank you!
 
67Stang said:
Exactly it is ridiculous "after 2 games"! My point exactly! Thank you!
Click to expand...

no, this is not about 2 games.

those qbs have track records, they have done it in the past, our qb has not.

if tannehill had been good his first 2 years but got off to the slow start this year, then yes, u can say its just 2 games and no need to worry, and many ppl would agree.

However, the same mistakes he has been making since his rookie season are still there. this season seems like a continuation from the final 2 games of the 2013 season.

people have a right to be concerned.

all those qbs u mentioned have done it in the past, ours has not.
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
no, this is not about 2 games.

those qbs have track records, they have done it in the past, our qb has not.

if tannehill had been good his first 2 years but got off to the slow start this year, then yes, u can say its just 2 games and no need to worry, and many ppl would agree.

However, the same mistakes he has been making since his rookie season are still there. this season seems like a continuation from the final 2 games of the 2013 season.

people have a right to be concerned.

all those qbs u mentioned have done it in the past, ours has not.
Click to expand...

They do have a track record of playing on good teams....Matt Ryans track record has not been very good lately. If Matt Moore was behind this line with no running game against Buffalo's front D line....the outcome would have been far worse. This team will be better once we get Pouncey and Moreno back after the bye and the rest of the line has a chance to gel and get the new offense down. To base everything off of the first 2 games is just stupid!
 
67Stang said:
They do have a track record of playing on good teams....Matt Ryans track record has not been very good lately. If Matt Moore was behind this line with no running game against Buffalo's front D line....the outcome would have been far worse. This team will be better once we get Pouncey and Moreno back after the bye and the rest of the line has a chance to gel and get the new offense down. To base everything off of the first 2 games is just stupid!
Click to expand...
im just curious what u r basing that on.

i cant really imagine how much worse it could have been. it is hard to get much worse than yesterday on offense.

am i going to say with certainty that moore would have led the offense to 30 pts and a win. NO, most likely not. But when u say the outcome with moore would have been far worse, u r implying that tannehill played decent and kept the game competitive, and with moore, the game is a blowout.

we lost 29-10. there was never a point that i felt we were going to win this game from the 2nd qtr on, because our offense was putrid.
 
Matt Moore folds or fumbles under pressure....he was also was horrible in the 4th quarter for us when he was the starter. Tanne has led multiple comeback wins in his brief career.
 
And then threw a pick 6 and fumbled 3 times!

---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 PM ----------

Just like last year!
 
67Stang said:
And then threw a pick 6 and fumbled 3 times!

---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 PM ----------

Just like last year!
Click to expand...

So he would've played like Tannehill bit can actually hit passes that score points?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom