Lazor deserves criticism | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Lazor deserves criticism

Dolfan Dave

Active Roster
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
1,462
Reaction score
594
Age
39
Location
Pt. Pleasant, NJ
Really poor job play calling today. First half was abysmal and completely gave up running the ball (ala Sherman) and instead of trying to get 3 before the half we raise white flag. The 4th and 1 call was unforgivable. Just get up to the line and let Tannehill sneak it. We were inches away.
 
I wasn't impressed with Lazor like the masses were last week. This week looked like Sherman's offense. Fear not Dolfans, don't have to worry about him him leaving for a HC gig at this point. I am hopeful but at the same time I don't have my hopes up from what I have seen thus far.
 
Maybe our OCs would look better if our QB was able to execute all the plays in their playbooks? Or maybe if he could hit Wallace deep?

Every OC we have from now til Tannehill is gone is going to look the same because our QB is limited and only does a few things well.
 
Yeah, he does. But with the piss poor QB play we saw today it's hard to gauge accurately how much criticism he deserves.
 
i do think losing moreno affected lazor. thats when philbin has to step in and right the ship and be a leader. lol.
 
Biggest problem with the team today was execution, not play-calling.

And I blame Philbin for running out the clock at the end of the half. That was absolutely the head coach's strategy decision.
 
Maybe our OCs would look better if our QB was able to execute all the plays in their playbooks? Or maybe if he could hit Wallace deep?

Every OC we have from now til Tannehill is gone is going to look the same because our QB is limited and only does a few things well.

Did you watch the game? Tannehill deserves blame but the play calling was a joke.
 
Maybe our OCs would look better if our QB was able to execute all the plays in their playbooks? Or maybe if he could hit Wallace deep?

Every OC we have from now til Tannehill is gone is going to look the same because our QB is limited and only does a few things well.
Unfortunately, this is the TRUTH. Completely different offensive system and we look exactly the same as the game up here last year. The only constant here is the QB.
 
The OL got their asses handed to them, Moreno goes down, Tannehill doesn't get it out on time, and can't hit the broad side of barn when he does. And you blame Lazor??? Lazor made good adjustments in the second half and we moved the ball consistently, but **** the bed as far as execution.
 
I can sympathize with Philbins decision to quit and regroup at half time and thats why he gave up in the 2nd quarter... but at the same time, he's f'kn leaving time on the clock and should be ran out of town for being such a f'kn coward...
 
Management of the run game was every bit as bad as Sherman last year, honestly even worse seeing as our running performance a couple games in didn't exactly merit being fed constantly. Lack of Moreno is no excuse, lost in his performance last week is the fact the Miller also ran pretty well in his chances. Miller was 11 for 46 running the ball today, with almost all of that coming before midway in the third quarter, so why the team thinks its more important constantly pass the ball with their QB only averaging 4 YPA through most of the game is beyond me. The game did get out of hand and merited passing consistently, but we abandoned the running game several drives before that.

Miller is one of the most hated guys on the team now that Thomas is cut, but IMHO those two haven't failed the team as featured runners as much as the team has failed to give them the opportunity to even establish themselves throughout the course of the game.
 
I will never understand that call to run out the clock in the first half. Phil acted like he was scared. Not good head coaching. Not a good leader. You don't play or coach scared.
 
I had issues with two of Lazor's first-half play calls. The one was a rollout flat pass I believe to Clay in which Tannehill had to throw while going backwards ... the play had no forward momentum and lost 5 yards. The next series or a couple of series later, there was another first-down play that was more an east-west play that lost yards. The biggest thing against the Bills is not putting yourself in positions where their D-Line can pin its ears back and tee off on Tannehill. You need efficient, high percentage first-down plays to keep them on their heels; that's exactly what the Dolphins did in the third quarter. The plays I mentioned were high-risk, low-reward plays and they came back to bite us.

I think Lazor might have let Moreno's injury affect his play-calling. He can't let that happen. He has to have faith that his line and backs can make positive plays, even if they aren't as good as the plays Moreno would make, and, again, in the third quarter we did that. But that moment of doubt really was worth about six points. A play-caller needs to keep his composure and believe in the game plan and stick with it, unless the QB is injured and has to leave the game. You can't get that deer in the headlights thing even for a few minutes at this level.
 
Did you watch the game? Tannehill deserves blame but the play calling was a joke.

What could Lazor call any differently? When he calls plays that stretch the defense, Tannehill fails with few exceptions. That, in turn, makes it harder for Lazor to get any short or intermediate passing going.
 
Back
Top Bottom