Lazor deserves criticism | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Lazor deserves criticism

Notice we didn't use any of the motion influence from the linemen heading east and west. The Bills would blow that up.

I posted in preseason that we weren't in position to care about the handful of opponents who would abuse our cutesy new offensive style. Unfortunately one of them is in our division and showed up very early on the road in a Fury of Anti Revenge situation. Bad news all around.

I knew it would be problematic in the first half. Tannehill and Lazor needed to seize opportunity in the second half. You won't accomplish that via sideways passes and screens. Attack aggressively downfield and in the seams, as Wannyheimer posted.

Too many of these coordinators got their start in college, where weak defenses are terrorized by dink and run plays. That doesn't happen dependably in the NFL. You have to look at where the ball will be caught. Is that gain good enough? If not, stay away. In our case with so few runs per game the YAC is even less reliable. Philadelphia can count on it with their 32 rushes per game on average.

Changing coordinators seldom pays full dividend. I'm not sure how Lazor managed a savior reputation based on one season at the Eagles when he was mostly pedestrian at Virginia. Is he going to scrap everything he previously knew, and relied on? Doesn't look like it. Tempo is moderate. Still early. I retain hope.

The quarterback is the variable. And that quarterback could really use a true number one receiver. Those receivers aren't a necessity in college but can be absolute gold in the NFL. I get sick of watching the Bears and trying to forget who we got for those two wonderful third round picks.
 
Too many of these coordinators got their start in college, where weak defenses are terrorized by dink and run plays. That doesn't happen dependably in the NFL. You have to look at where the ball will be caught. Is that gain good enough? If not, stay away. In our case with so few runs per game the YAC is even less reliable. Philadelphia can count on it with their 32 rushes per game on average.

You and I have big disagreements on some things, but you are 100% right on the money about the freaking screens and pitches 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage. You have been on that from the start and it was a bullseye from the beginning.

Those plays are a waste of time and talent. Charles Clay had 7 catches for 31 yards, including at least two (maybe 3) by my count on Sunday where he LOST 3-5 yards. I just... don't... get it.
 
You and I have big disagreements on some things, but you are 100% right on the money about the freaking screens and pitches 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage. You have been on that from the start and it was a bullseye from the beginning.

Those plays are a waste of time and talent. Charles Clay had 7 catches for 31 yards, including at least two (maybe 3) by my count on Sunday where he LOST 3-5 yards. I just... don't... get it.


I certainly agree when playing the Bills.

Those plays have a place in the playbook....and we have seen them work, but yesterday was not the day they were going to be effective against that defense.

I also agree that we are not attacking the middle of the field enough. Between Clay and Simms we should be taking lots of shots at the seam routes and we seem to have abandoned that.
 
So what the hell is miami going to do without moreno for 4 weeks? Lamar miller is not that good, anyone know of the rbs they might take or look at? I heard miami resigned daniel thomas. He sucks.
 
So what the hell is miami going to do without moreno for 4 weeks?

What I think we should do: Give Damien Williams the opportunity to be the starting tailback and see what happens.

What I think we will do: Put Daniel Thomas and a gimpy Lamar Miller in there and average 1.8 yards per carry for six weeks.
 
What I think we should do: Give Damien Williams the opportunity to be the starting tailback and see what happens.

What I think we will do: Put Daniel Thomas and a gimpy Lamar Miller in there and average 1.8 yards per carry for six weeks.

that;s true. Miami should go with a guy with potential like Damien Williams and give him the opportunity. We've already seen what daniel thomas can't do and lamar miller is not that great either. Fins need a ground attack so I hope they go with him and williams a chance and the team a chance to some resemblance of a ground attack. Lamar miller and thomas can't do that and both sub par to me.
 
Bill Lazor: "There is no doubt the blame rests 100 percent on me"

I am curious to see how our team responds this week. My guess is very well. ALL of our guys on offense will be highly motivated and focused because they know deep down that they didn't execute the offense very well and it was Lazor stepping up to take the blame.
 
We've got playmakers but for guys to make plays in the passing game, you can't forget the "pass" part of it. EJ Manuel didn't have many plays today where he failed to deliver the ball where his playmaker could make a play. Tannehill didn't do that once.

'
Completely 100% FALSE!
 
Tannehill takes sacks on plays where every other QB in the league would avoid. He might have the worst pocket-prescence Ive ever seen in my 33 years watching football.
 
Completely 100% FALSE!
Yeah. It is one thing to say that EJ played pretty well with low expectations. And that Tannehill played poorly with high expectations. But that EJ didn't **** up any throws and that Tannehill didn't make a single good one? I'll take what is pointless hyperbole for $1,000, Alex.
 
That and Lamar Miller has zero vision. The same plays that Moreno could do well with, Miller gets 0, if not negative yards.
Tannehill and Miller are coach-killers.
 
All day long I was trying to find out what went wrong yesterday. I think Tannehill had a horrible game, which is not breaking news obviously. I also think that Bill Lazor might not be the offensive genius we all thought (and hoped) he would be. Then I went back and looked at the passing plays of the first half (didn't bother watching the 2nd half because my assumption proved right in the first 30 minutes already). On a total of 16 passing plays (if my count is correct), the Bills rushed four 13 times, five 2 times and six 1 time. All three sacks happened when the Bills rushed four. Tannehill was under constant pressure on all of the sixteen plays.

There's no QB in the world who could do well under these circumstances and there's no offensive coordinator who could look like a genius if the defensive front four brings pressure on every play. That's not to defend Tannehill, he could have made some throws he didn't make. His receivers could have some catches they didn't make. But this explains at least why no receiver was open all day, why no screen passes worked, why every time when a receiver caught a ball there were three defenders around him. It's impossible to have an effective passing game when the offensive line can't block four guys.
 
I wasn't impressed with Lazor like the masses were last week. This week looked like Sherman's offense. Fear not Dolfans, don't have to worry about him him leaving for a HC gig at this point. I am hopeful but at the same time I don't have my hopes up from what I have seen thus far.

He did not have a good plan for the Bills, but he did have a brilliant plan for the Patriots.
 
Way too dinky many screen plays. Biggest problem I have seen with Lazor. This team isn't good enough to sustain 15 play drives. QB isn't good enough, Miller isn't good enough, receivers tend to drop footballs. Enough with it. Sink or swim throwing downfield.

I agree Tannehill hasn't taken the step we want him to make but I do believe he is "good enough" to get what we need done done. Watching yesterday I kept thinking how this team could use and OJ McDuffy, a guy who was nails on third and whatever. It seems like we have to many drops at key times with this team. As unimpressive as Tannehill was, take away the three botched special teams plays and the Miller drop and we could of won the game.

---------- Post added at 07:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:54 PM ----------

Tannehill takes sacks on plays where every other QB in the league would avoid. He might have the worst pocket-prescence Ive ever seen in my 33 years watching football.

You might want to watch any 33 years and pay closer attention because thats BS.
 
Back
Top Bottom