no idea what everyone is going on about the offensive line.
a very good line was built (as i have said numerous times in other threads).
Armstead - Wynn - Williams - Hunt - Jackson.
Could it have been better? Pretty much any offensive line in NFL history "could have been better."
Then Armstead did what Armstead unfortunately does. Miss time.
What happens?
Kendall Lamm steps in and, while he is no Terron Armstead, he played LT far better than I could have hoped for.
That is good offensive line construction.
Connor Williams was a top 3 center virtually all season, until he was injured and out for the year.
Unlike the good fortune we had with Lamm, you aren't replacing that guy from the bench.
Do I wish we had a top 10 or top 15 center just hanging out on the bench in case of injury? Of course, but that isn't really realistic.
When Eich had Wynn to his left and Hunt to his right, he held up ok at center, but again, Connor was virtually the top guy.
Then Wynn goes out, then Hunt goes out, then Austin even missed time.
So you are plugging in Cotton, Jones, Kion Smith, etc. etc. etc. and things were rocky.
So what is your real criticism? Our projected top five wasn't up to your standard? Our depth was insufficient? Something else?
If it's the second one, I'm pretty sure every team in the league laments they aren't 2 and 3 deep with (quality) starting caliber players on the OLine.