Well, he completely decimated your argument that you are now continuing to use, for some stubborn reason. The stats he provided showed that he was absolutely effective, so Dan Campbell's decision to stop using him despite Miller's success is one of many reasons why Dan Campbell didn't get the job here. How are any of those stats "random?"
They are the most basic of stats.
The Texans are learning that Brock Osweiler isn't a very good QB, as are defenses who are able to focus on stopping Miller, knowing full well that the passing game isn't as big of a threat, which is also evident in Osweiler's improved stats in the second half of games once defenses open up to the pass a little more by focusing on Miller (though Osweiler's improved second half play is still pretty bad).
As for the lack of TDs, he's had 6 attempts in the redzone all year.
6. That's the same number of
TDs he had for us in the redzone last year.
But hey, maybe you're right. Maybe we're better off with our QB being our leading rusher. You guys nailed it. Just think of all that money we saved by not re-signing Miller that we put to great use shoring up absolutely no other positions of need.
