When he actually wins something I will compare to an alltime great.
Why, Marino never won the big one and he's not great? He isn't Brady yet but has all the intangibles to be as good as him.
When he actually wins something I will compare to an alltime great.
I agree. It's pretty narrow at this point.Luck is better and he should be. The distance isn't as much as people want to believe it is.
That's right. A LOT.I will say Luck's receivers bail him out a LOT.
luck is not having his best game today, that is for sure, but he still is able to make throws that tannehill can never complete. also, he moves around in the pocket a lot better than tannehill does.I don't see much of a difference. Tannehill has thrown for more Yards and TDs (I acknowledge also more INTs) than Luck - all that behind the worst offense line in football and basically without a running game.
Also I haven't seen anything special from Luck today.
Comments like this are ridiculous.
i cant tell if u r being sarcastic because if u r being sarcastic and can not see a difference between tannehill and luck, i dont know what to tell u.
Every QB has bad games. Not sure how people don't understand this.
Luck is better and he should be. The distance isn't as much as people want to believe it is.
That's because he actually has room to move in the pocket. Every single of his moves behind our line and he wouldn't look like he could move around.luck is not having his best game today, that is for sure, but he still is able to make throws that tannehill can never complete. also, he moves around in the pocket a lot better than tannehill does.
I will say Luck's receivers bail him out a LOT.
So why did you mention that that is the big stat between qbs when it's a team game?
o alright, then u r a very smart man, lol.Very witty. You're like a rhetorical wizard.
No sarcasm. Dead serious.
Why, Marino never won the big one and he's not great? He isn't Brady yet but has all the intangibles to be as good as him.