hoops
Tua time!
[/B]
truthfully? um yes
I will have what this guys drinking
[/B]
truthfully? um yes
I will have what this guys drinking
dude rex grossman has been to the playoffs. tannehill has not. TO stay ahead of the curve and block your upcoming argument, grossman was an important factor towards the bears making the postseason. Tannehill has been kind of close to actually making the playoffs. I feel like there are some people who want us to have a pro bowler at every position before they will unbiasedly evaluate tannehill
I will have what this guys drinking
No...but Denver hardly had an elite line last year.
I would think you would be an outside observer that would acknowledge CJ as a more complete all around back...and certainly a tougher runner than Lamar Miller.
[/B]
truthfully? um yes
Point is that oline and scheme is a hell of a lot sounder than what we ran out there with and will run out there with personnel wise barring some it looks like now draft upgrades...
Andersons not taking lateral steps from the time he takes the hand off cause some guy who blows chunks blows his assignment...on repeat
no its because grossman at times would make a game changing play. grossman is probably the definition of an avg to slightly above avg qb.. he could win you a game or two. our guy is a glorified game manager. anyone that says any different is biased or in denial or bothIs it because Chicago got to the Super Bowl that year?
Agreed...now, answer the question...who is the tougher runner, who is better at getting tough yards at crunch time?
Lamar is the speed, home run hitter....CJ is the grinder that wears down defenses when the game is on the line.
I wanted to keep Lamar....but I'll be happy with CJ, in fact...I see an upgrade.
dude rex grossman has been to the playoffs. tannehill has not. TO stay ahead of the curve and block your upcoming argument, grossman was an important factor towards the bears making the postseason. Tannehill has been kind of close to actually making the playoffs. I feel like there are some people who want us to have a pro bowler at every position before they will unbiasedly evaluate tannehill
no its because grossman at times would make a game changing play. grossman is probably the definition of an avg to slightly above avg qb.. he could win you a game or two. our guy is a glorified game manager. anyone that says any different is biased or in denial or both