Dolphins17-0 said:
Dolphins17-0 said:
Oboy said:I agree with Whitehurst. He really opened my eyes today. But Hackney? I was NOT impressed with him. I thought he only had a few good throws. Add that to his height (or lack there of) and I would pass on Hackney.
fishypete said:Lets say this...he didn't impress me...he didn't have a game like Rivers had...and I rather have Croyle.
CrunchTime said:I guess you and me are the only guys in the planet who are not impressed with him.
His accuracy problem originates from his poor mechanics.That plus poor decision making and very close coverage in the NFL will lead to many interceptions.
The way he handles the ball at the line of scrimmage with those small hands will probably lead to too many fumbles too.
The guy has a quick release and a cannon of an arm but he looks like a project to me.I would rather take a gamble on Croyle or Whitehurst at a much lower cost,
However I am glad he is overated because that means he will be drafted ahead of us and someone else will drop to us.
BTW if Cutler ever corrects those flawed mechanics it will increase his power if thats possible and it certainly will make him more accurate.Then he could be compared to the Palmers and Mannings.
fishypete said:I agree...cutler in the 2nd round is good value...but he isn't a player that brings a 1st round value grade...thats where the hype comes in. If Quinn was in this draft...Cutler wouldn't be a thought....but the QB draft like last year is weak...so players get hyped up...until the bell rings and it's for real.
SpeedRush99 said:Dripping with sarcasm I see. Although I completely agree with that statment.
fishypete said:I agree...cutler in the 2nd round is good value...but he isn't a player that brings a 1st round value grade...thats where the hype comes in. If Quinn was in this draft...Cutler wouldn't be a thought....but the QB draft like last year is weak...so players get hyped up...until the bell rings and it's for real.