russianbear
Club Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,594
- Reaction score
- 2,017
1. That's not remotely his biggest knock. His biggest knock is that he runs the ball poorly, which is a RB's #1 job if you didn't know.
2. "we don't have a good history of drafting RBs" since when does the resume of one GM affect the next one's performance? The answer is never.
Whoaaa shots fired, sounds like you got some sand stuck up you know where.
Runs the ball poorly huh?....his career #s don't really help you much on that argument.....and in case you haven't noticed our RBs run the ball pretty poorly too, only difference is this guy can block. so guess what? he makes this team better the moment he is signed. 2 year stop gap, give us time to find a real answer at RB.
you're right, one GM's resume has nothing to do with the next, but it sure does effect my perception of how this team functions as a whole. Also I think it was mentioned earlier that drafting RBs isn't a very reliable process for ANY team. So we can either a) stick with what we have and cross our fingers our drafted RB is capable of taking significant snaps and picking up a blitz effectively or b) go with an option that may not be flashy or long term solution, but is proven to be a contributor in a few different ways. Like I said, I don't really care who it is we sign but we should sign someone to improve what we have.
really good post though seriously.