FinzFan
There Ain't No Submariners Down in Hell
jesusfreak26 said:Vikings | More about potential Culpepper trade
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 20:58:31 -0800
Don Seeholzer and <A href="http://www.kffl.com/link/33">Sean Jensen, of the Pioneer Press, report the Minnesota Vikings would gain an additional $2.3 million in salary cap space by trading QB Daunte Culpepper. In addition, if he is traded soon, Culpepper's $6 million roster bonus would be paid by his new club. Given Culpepper's knee injury, the return on Culpepper could be minimal for the Vikings. The source said teams would not part with a first-round pick and that a conditional pick was expected. According to FOXSports.com, if the Vikings can't trade him before that bonus is due, they intend to ask him to push the date back in order to continue to work toward a trade. Pat Kirwan, a senior analyst for NFL.com, said because of Culpepper's uncertain physical status, any trade likely will involve future conditional draft choices. "This would be a sliding scale that I've run past a few general managers that are not in the market for Culpepper," Kirwan said. "The draft picks are for 2007. If you trade for the guy and he never plays, the compensation is zero. If he plays eight or less games, the compensation is a second-round pick. If he plays nine or more games, the compensation is a first-round pick. If he throws for 3,000 yards, then it's a first and a third. And if he makes the Pro Bowl next year, it's two first-round picks."
According to this report a trade for him would be something I wouldn't want a part of. The team that trades for him would eat the remainder of his signing bonus which is 6 million. The draft picks would be conditional in 2007 and could be two first round picks.
That to me is just to much.
After reading your post I am inclined to agree 100%. Too much baggage in that deal. Not that he is or isn't better in one or more respects than the other options, but this does not make good business sense.