Good one, he has been running for his life the past few years
Miko Grimes Interview (Talks about player's confidence in coaches / Tannehill)
- Thread starter Asicswrg85
- Start date
Good one, he has been running for his life the past few years
It was also 14-10 to start the 4th against the Ravens. The offense was in one of these situations again. They kicked a FG and didn't take the lead and never scored again. Now we are 3 for 6 on offense when trailing in the 4th quarter if you count all the games
You are forgetting those kc and ravens blowouts were close games in the 4th.
You are forgetting those kc and ravens blowouts were close games in the 4th.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 30,319
- Reaction score
- 16,143
Well, we were talking about close games in which one unit failed to get it done, not meltdowns in which both units sucked donkey nuts for an entire quarter. We got plenty of those, too. Heck, let's expand it to the half. Guess what, the offense AND defense sucked ass in the second half against the Patriots on Sunday. Let's give 'em both an additional 0 for 1 for that.
That would remove the Denver game. Lol
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 30,319
- Reaction score
- 16,143
How would that remove the Denver game? We lost by three points.
Both sides of the team played like **** in the 4th. Lol
Just admit you missed those 2 and the offense is 3 for 6.
Those were close games where we could not take the lead in the 4th on offense when presented the opportunity
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 30,319
- Reaction score
- 16,143
Nah, I should have specified that I was referring to games that were won or lost in the final three minutes or so, rather than saying "4th quarter." I thought that was obvious from the fact that I judged Denver as an opportunity for the offense, rather than the defense.
That said, I'm sure that if you really want to be overly literal and look at EVERY 4th quarter opportunity we had on both sides of the ball this season, you'll find that both units come out looking like ****.
That said, I'm sure that if you really want to be overly literal and look at EVERY 4th quarter opportunity we had on both sides of the ball this season, you'll find that both units come out looking like ****.
jason_taylor
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2004
- Messages
- 4,336
- Reaction score
- 9
OH Bull**** , Hey Miko whos fault was it when GB drove down the field and scored in the last seconds of the game and won ? i guess it was the Offence ? and when Detroit drove down the field and they also scored in the last seconds to win the Game ?i guess that was on the Offence to ? Just because her Husband plays on the Defence she will defend him 100% and i guess it was on Tannehill that it was week 15 before he started throwing the deep ball AND HIT 6 out of 9 Deep balls , NAaaa i dont think so That was on the Coaching Staff 100% yeah Miko uphold your man till hell Freezes over BUT THE STATS DONT LIE , BOTH ON DEFENCE AND ON THE COACHING STAFF!!!!!!! REDICKULOUS .
dabeastdabone
Seasoned Veteran
After further review Wake should earn his Captain status and handle his guys, tell Grimes to get his old lady to STFU. Seriously, last years media disaster wasn't enough? Now the little stonier wanna be involved wife puts herself into the position to drive a wedge in the locker room. What ever happened to all that crap about what happens in the locker room stays in the locker room.
Selective stats, I see.
The facts are the offense had opportunities in 6 games and only scored in 3.
In all 3 of those games where the offense scored and took the lead the defense held on the ensuing possession in all 3 cases.
So in all 3 cases the defense gave the ball back to the offense and we were still leading.
Only when we are forced to protect the lead twice are we unsuccessful on defense.
I guess in your world only the times we score count and as soon as you take the lead in the 4th you don't have to do anymore on offense
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
When I see Russell Wilson (or any QB) actually make a play to seal the game that should count for something. Its like people will admit that the other QB did a great job in that situation, but they won't go the step further to say ours did a poor job in the same situation. If the offense doesn't win the game themselves when they have the opportunity, then they cut the teams chances to win the game dramatically. The way I look at it is both Tannehill and Rodgers had opportunities to win the game, Tannehill had one down to complete one pass, which is not easy in that situation. And Rodgers had to drive 60 yards and score a TD, but had 4 downs to work with. So for me both QBs had equal opportunities to win the game.
utahphinsfan
Club Member
And they are the only ones who are susceptible to confirmation and/or hindsight bias, right?
If you can answer that with a straight face and genuinely believe it then what the deuce are doing here? Shouldn't you be running for office?
gfish24
Rookie
Then please, please, stop logging on