You try everything possible to replace the bum and if it is not feasible then stick with him another year. But plan on seeing more of this if he stays another season.
Don't get me wrong. What he did Week 17 was unacceptable. However, the leaders of the team and the HC have to find a way to get through the year and them can him if he is unproductive in '15.
His behavioral issues aren't relegated to week 17.
I am paying attention and I am not taking the brutal cap hit you are suggesting for next season.
Idk I don't think it's worth cutting him this year , esp with what he does allow us to do on offense. And despite quitting on his team, I don't doubt Wallace is a passionate player and for him to quit during the last game a meaningless game at that in what turns out to be an overwhelmingly meaningless season.... Havibg had time to reflect he needs a coach to actually coach him and redeem himself in the eyes of his teammates.
Then you are not understanding how the cap works. The "brutal cap hit" is for this year, and then comes back to us next year. As a result, the team can very easily use next year's cap savings to sign FA's this year. It's not all that complicated. You pay a player little this year, and make it up next year when the cap hit comes back. Simple math, and I think players will trust the Dolphins to be able to pay them next year. :)
Why have I read that he didn't opt out that Philbin benched him for calling out the coaches at halftime? Also Lazor offense doesn't back the defense out of the box. The Jets proved that as soon as Wallace went out the stacked the box, pinned their ears back and brought the house.
Are you really serious or, just joking?
Holy ****…I know how the cap works and I DON'T want the hit for this ****ing year. I get it…you want to can him now for more money in 2016. I do not want to do that.
BTW, if you release Wallace you will have to spend money filling his position with a player or players. I am assuming your idea is not filling his role "in house".
Why would you not want to do that? As far as signing FA's the money is the same if they get it this year or next year. The cap on Wallace is not an issue.
The issue is if he is worth keeping, and I do not think he is. I believe we can replace his production in a #1 pick and FA. I'm more concerned with Tannehill's continued development than a Wallace, who is nothing special.
In which part? Several reporters have claimed Philbin benched Wallace during the second half for calling out coaches in the locker room. Or about the attention Wallace draws in the field? If you are going to deny that you aren't even worth talking too.
In which part? Several reporters have claimed Philbin benched Wallace during the second half for calling out coaches in the locker room. Or about the attention Wallace draws in the field? If you are going to deny that you aren't even worth talking too.