Ray_Finkle#5
programme by the cia to punch fireman ed
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2009
- Messages
- 225
- Reaction score
- 4
How about Moore, Vontae's 2nd and marshalls 3rd. (i think) for some receiver help?
TANNEHILL's performance has been dick. He has cured NONE of his shortcomings. He STILL makes bad reads, and can't reliably read the middle of the field at all. He still locks onto his target for at least a "2 Mississippi" count, and too often he's "wild high", to borrow a baseball metaphor. That last flaw to me indicates one of 2 things: (1) he's guessing about his read and hoping he's right; and (2) he was too late w/his throw, and overthrew trying to get more on his pass in order to get it there on time.
I don't believe that the "game" has slowed down sufficiently for him, and I wonder if it ever will, and if so, when?
TANNEHILL's performance has been d*"k. He has cured NONE of his shortcomings. He STILL makes bad reads, and can't reliably read the middle of the field at all. He still locks onto his target for at least a "2 Mississippi" count, and too often he's "wild high", to borrow a baseball metaphor. That last flaw to me indicates one of 2 things: (1) he's just guessing about his read and hoping he's right; and (2) he was too late w/his throw, and overthrew trying to get more on his pass in order to get it there on time.
I don't believe that the "game" has slowed down sufficiently for him AT ALL, and I wonder if it ever will: and if so, when? Right now, to borrow a phrase from GILBERT & SULLIVAN, TANNEHILL looks like "a novice in a nunnery".
Did Tannehill call your mom a prostitute or something?
tannehill is the future. we have solid back ups with garrard and devlin. lets get what we can for him
how is he not a solid back up? beforeyou insult why dont you back your mouth up with some factsThat's a joke, right?
If you think that GARRARD's a solid back-up, then there's no hope for you. Ditto, DEVLIN.