Yeah, but the Giants target was Cam Ward.I think it's very possible to see it go Ward, Hunter and Sanders at 1, 2 & 3. The Giants wanted to trade up to #1 so QB could be their target
If we draft any Texas offensive players, it will tell me all I need to know about McDoofus. Drafting players that have almost the same scheme as us is lazy and shows that McD can't really coach up any rookies and that his offense is retarded and too complicated. Not that I didn't already know those things...
The only problem is that teams drafting 14-20 dont need a QB. So what would compel the Steelers to trade up with us.It appears Pittsburgh is in love with Sanders. They might be willing, but in this case, we can hope.
Players with the athletic profile to play in your scheme is one thing, but drafting players that don't (Banks), but that already know your scheme, so you don't have to teach them your stupid convoluted scheme is a different thing entirely. This would be the latter. Lazy and "safe".So, taking guys that fit your scheme is a negative?Every head coach in the NFL must be lazy and incompetent also. What a ridiculous statement.
you don't think Banks is athletic?Players with the athletic profile to play in your scheme is one thing, but drafting players that don't (Banks), but that already know your scheme, so you don't have to teach them your stupid convoluted scheme is a different thing entirely. This would be the latter. Lazy and "safe".
Not enough for us at 13.you don't think Banks is athletic?
Lol, yep!I mean look at it there is 4 busts on those comps. Even eifert Loveland wants to be a better pro than.