We have to strengthen up the run game so that we can stretch the field. It's the best way to counteract the fact that the Pats still have no pass rush and create little pressure on the QB. Revis and Browner are press coverage beasts because of their physicality, but this exposes them if we add a mid-range weapon (seam-busting TE which we all talk about), and are able to have a balanced run game. The plan would be to make them over-aggressive.
Revis and Browner...****, that's a physical matchup. Let's not downplay this. Although they have their weaknesses, Revis wrecked us in his Jets day, and Browner is bigger and more physical than any of our WRs. That being said, I've watched my fair share of Browner and he is susceptible to being beat over the top because he comes down hard on receivers. That's where stretching the field comes in. Make him bite. Revis, I hate having Revis back in our division. That sucks. He's not old, he's not washed up, he's 28 years old and is coming off a strong season after an achilles injury.
We need to acquire more dynamic pieces on offense. After shoring up the OL, having a TE that creates havoc and matchup nightmares completely opens up the field. Think about it, Clay was playing very well for us in stretches last year after being thrown into the helm as #1 TE. Adding a big-time TE to what Clay brings would mess with defensive coordinators minds. Add a bruiser of a RB and the short game opens up entirely and creates space for Miller...who, let's be honest, even though he averaged 4.2 ypc, he was underproductive because the offense couldn't create space. Let Tannehill continue to progress and give him another offseason with Wallace, and he better be able to hit him with the deep ball. With our current offensive core I think we get shutdown by the Pats defense.
Bringing this back to the Pats issue, they have a weak front 7 with Wilfork wanting out of NE. Teams need to expose that because the DBs will force the offense into the looks they want because of their physicality.