Too bad he wont find success at QB on this team. That position is filled for the next 10 years by Chad Henne.
Man i hope not i want to be better than a 500 team
Too bad he wont find success at QB on this team. That position is filled for the next 10 years by Chad Henne.
so a WR who doesn't contribute at all his first year gets a complete pass....
but a QB is supposed to get it from day 1 and can be labled a bust after 1 year??
I think a more accurate statement would be 'rarely does a reciever come into the NFL not earn a single play on offense their entire rookie season, and develope into anything significant.'
I'm all for giving BOTH a chance to improve before writing them off....unfortunately the majority of the board only wants to afford PT that chance.
Man i hope not i want to be better than a 500 team
Name one comparison between the two.
No, i think i wrote exactly what i wanted to. Pat White showed that he cant function on our team at QB, because well, the position is already taken. I dont write him off as a player but i write him off as ever contributing to this team because he doesnt want to switch positions so how will he contribute??
And Patrick Turner hasnt had his chance to prove anything so there is no way you can already write him off.
dude did u just start picking up on the nfl recently?? heres the story we had chad pennington our starting veteran qb that can take us to the playoffs, henne our qb of the future, and pat white (OUR NEW WILDCAT QB) there was a chance he could take henne's spot as qb of the future, BUT THATS NOT WHAT HE WAS DRAFTED FOR. and pat turner did have his chance, how can u say we let our later pick (hartline) get one and not pat turner our huge reciever we got in the third, obviously he didnt do anything in training camp.
hmmm maybe the fact that ted ginn was promising coming out of college and busted, and same thing with turner 1st day pick great size but as of now 0 production
Pat Turner is our next ted ginn
Really? I mean , you must know what you're talking about. And you probably already know that Teddy was drafted at #9 and Turner was picked way later. But you knew that, just had something stupid in your mouth that had to come out.
ted ginn 1st round pick, smallish build, super fast, given 3 years worth of starts to prove himself.
Pat turner mid round pick, huge build, mid range speed, didn't see the field his rookie year...
I don't see the comparison myself.
so a WR who doesn't contribute at all his first year gets a complete pass....
but a QB is supposed to get it from day 1 and can be labled a bust after 1 year??
I think a more accurate statement would be 'rarely does a reciever come into the NFL not earn a single play on offense their entire rookie season, and develope into anything significant.'
I'm all for giving BOTH a chance to improve before writing them off....unfortunately the majority of the board only wants to afford PT that chance.
Pat White didn't do so bad in the times he actually played for us he even got us the first down vs the Jets in that Monday night game in our game winning drive. the only problems he had was he overthrew his receivers, i remmber one play or two that our WR was open and White overthrew