Is that what you got out of the article?
Finfan, you could ask a lot of these people that question, some people are going to see, what they want to see, and nobody is going to convince them of anything less.
Is that what you got out of the article?
No I didn't read it. I didn't need to. We have many on this board who have expressed a similar opinion I am sure. I was only asking to make sure I can understand why so many people have an issue with others criticizing his play.
Well, if you had read it, you would have realized that Perkins didn't say that Tannehill didn't deserve criticism.
Yea, the run D is a huge problem.......
When Tannehill leaves them on the field all day.
Let's blame the D for giving us 2 points directly, setting us up for an easy TD(our only one of course) and holding the opponent under 20 till late in the 4th qtr, only to finally collapse from having been on the field most of the game while trying to keep every opponent under 17 points. :rolleyes2:
agree. The game was just sitting there at 21- 13 and 15 forever it seemed. Felt like we had 16 3 and outs during that period. Awful.He is a lot higher than #5, the score was 21-15 going into the 4th don't forget with the D accounting for 9 of those points....My top 5 problems are 1. RT, 2. tackling, 3. special team coverage unit 4. coaching 5. WR
bang on!!!my top 2:
1) coaching
2) tannehill
3) tackling
please stop with blaming the oline, those guys are doing there job. Tanny just folds in the pocket just like henne used to...i see no former wr in tanny at all.
Our young QB who had an improved season last year has suddenly regressed, it's not illogical to assume it's the coaching.