PFF Tannehill analysis (3rd Ranked Passer) | Page 6 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

PFF Tannehill analysis (3rd Ranked Passer)

yes because Manning has a proven track record of being accurate and being a Franchise QB.

Even poor QB's can score 2 TD's, and win a game. But we are trying to determine if RT is a leader for our Franchise.

And his accuracy issues, poor pocket presence, and inconsistency say he is not.

Dude just stfu already...your b.s. is getting old.
 
what does that have to do with this discussion? I was replying to someone taking about Peyton Manning not facebeard boy.

i was just working off the point about 3 tds need no explanation...you guys would be in for quite a eye opener if you broke down andrew lucks tape the other night...he is not jesus in cleats...leaves plays and points on the field just like our qb does...misses throws he should make etc

---------- Post added at 01:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 PM ----------

In Brady's first year starting he made the probowl, won the superbowl, and was superbowl MVP. How is that in any way just being a game manager? Brees was pretty good pretty quick as well.

compare his stats to tannys his first 2 years there boss
 
Of course, I'm not pointing the finger directly at Manning, its total team effort and have never said otherwise, but his lack of possession certainly had a play in that. As well as his poor decision making on third down to throw under the first down markers. Can you explain otherwise?

FWIW, Peyton had a higher grade from PFF in 8 different games than that of what any QB has put up in 2 games this year, and in some cases double, just not yet.
 
In Brady's first year starting he made the probowl, won the superbowl, and was superbowl MVP. How is that in any way just being a game manager? Brees was pretty good pretty quick as well.

Mmhmm...sure. He was so good early on the chargers didn't want to keep him. That makes sense.
 
I had no problem with RT17's win over New England. Yes he left some points on the field. But it didn't hurt us. It's when he does it and we lose is when I question his ability.

Many, many, many posters had all kinds of problems with it.
 
The problem is...they loss due to very poor special teams, not being able to cover Watkins, poor LB play and poor o-line play (in the first half)...Tanneill didn't play well, but he didn't hand the other team the game (as many are trying to make it out to be)

never said he lost the game. But he will not survive going 1-4 vs Buffalo. and that make me question his ability.
 
Mmhmm...sure. He was so good early on the chargers didn't want to keep him. That makes sense.

Brees took until his 4th season to be the NFL player everyone sees him as...his first 3 years he was completing at 60 or below of his passes and had a TPA of 5.9 and 6.2..
 
never said he lost the game. But he will not survive going 1-4 vs Buffalo. and that make me question his ability.

Well, if we're going to say that the Buffalo game wasn't all on Tannehill... who is ultimately responsible for that 1-4 record vs the Bills?

Because while I want more from my QB, there's one person who is just sort of skedaddling along without too much blame even though the lion's share must fall on his narrow shoulders.
 
never said he lost the game. But he will not survive going 1-4 vs Buffalo. and that make me question his ability.

Why not, Buffalo's team is built to beat Miami...as Miami is built to beat New England...teams have different strengths and weakneeses....Miami's weaknesses just so happens to play right into Buffalo's stregth.
 
Brees took until his 4th season to be the NFL player everyone sees him as...his first 3 years he was completing at 60 or below of his passes and had a TPA of 5.9 and 6.2..

Tannehills first 2 seasons in the nfl are better than brees so the moron who said that clearly doesn't know what the **** he's talking about. I swear people on this site are complete idiots. They just make stuff up. They don't watch other qbs play full games either. They just watch highlights. Hoops is on point, I watched both colts games this year and luck is about the same as Tannehill in the accuracy department.
 
Why not, Buffalo's team is built to beat Miami...as Miami is built to beat New England...teams have different strengths and weakneeses....Miami's weaknesses just so happens to play right into Buffalo's stregth.

True, NFL is a game of match ups. And we don't match well against Bills.

But having a non-winning record against all of your divisions foes will get you fired.
 
I did the same and can't find a close up on the side (even the endzone cam doesn't give much)...I will concede that Wallace should have been able to get his feet down....it looked like he a. thought he was already out of bounds or b. had more room on the sideline.

I tend to think it is (b), for two reasons. First, he drags his left foot after stepping out of bounds with his right. The sequence was: catch with left foot in bounds, too wide of a step with his right foot, then drag the left foot.

Second, he has shown a lack of sideline awards on other plays. The catch out of bounds against Tampa last season and a catch in preseason this year where he steps out of bounds attempting to make a cut after catching a pass. He seems to lose track of where he is relative to the sideline.
 
Back
Top Bottom