I have never met Joe Philbin but I think that he is disliked by some because he is not a colorful media personality. Every time he talks in front of a camera he is careful what he says, so he says things that are boring and give away very little. As such he is a disciple of the Belichick school of coaches who never give anything away. Never.
From what I've read he is extremely well organized and every part of the program has been analyzed carefully. He is logical, structured and disciplined and probably wants his coaching staff and players to be as well. It was not an accident or luck that the team was up near the top in the NFL in terms of giving up the fewest penalties.
When he was appointed he explained that the key to his system is education (Hey, he coached at Harvard he probably learned something). Every coach and assistant coach is effectively a teacher. This is in stark contrast to Sparano who appeared to be hopeless at developing the assembled talent. The Meathead administration did an awful job of developing assembled players like Henne, Gates, Vontae Davis, Jerry, Patrick Turner, Pat White, Merling, etc.
Joe Philbin's great strength in Green Bay was progressively developing Offensive players from the Draft, year after year. Obvious successes are Aaron Rodgers, Jordy Nelson, Greg Jennings, Jermichael Finley, James Jones but there were a stack of O-linemen as well. Green Bay, like Pittsburgh and New York Giants, consistently develops talent through the Draft and they stick to that formula without excessive spending in Free Agency, which can be successful but is much higher risk. As Head Coach of the Dolphins he gets to expand his player development philosophy to the Defense as well. Another big part of the player development is limiting their playing time exposure as rookies. This is how Green Bay does it and we have to be more patient to see how our drafted prospects for 2013 go next year. In year one, the big exceptions to this were Tannehill and Martin. Tannehill was a special case because of his understanding of Sherman's system and his maturity. I'm sure that Joe wishes that we had the personnel to have kept Martin on the bench for longer given his personal implosion in the cafeteria.
It would be wrong to scrap Joe and his player development philosophy, having invested the time in making them wait and getting them hungry.
Already some progress from the year 1 drafted players eg Tannehill, Vernon, Matthews, Miller looking good. Even Egnew was sighted as making some progress. Other players like Clay, Carroll, Clemons, Odrick, Shelby, Jerry, Wilson and Daniel Thomas all appeared to make progress and made bigger contributions for the team.
After the Patriots game we were 8 - 6 and playing pretty well. Five of the games that we lost we were very competitive and could easily have been a 10 win season.
And then we went to Buffalo and the wheels just totally fell off. I don't fully understand why it unravelled so quickly. The conditions in Buffalo were bad, the Hartline injury against the Jets was very costly and Tannehill struggled without either of his go to guys (Hartline and Gibson). The fall off was shocking and unexpected.
So I would argue we should not throw the baby out with the bathwater, by firing Joe Philbin and getting a whole new system, new coaches and new players, etc when we were still on track for success 2 weeks ago.
I'm behind Joe for another year, please stand with me.