123phins
Active Roster
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Messages
- 734
- Reaction score
- 6
No more of a risk than having vet stop gaps that are past their prime except the rookies will improved from year to year and the vets deteriorate. I dont even see huge risk with 2 on the OL. Only thing i could see risk at is two rookies on the same side.
I could care less about PFF stats. I look at the fact that the bears Offence was very successful with 2 rookies, KC had a great year with a rookie on the line, Eagles had and explosive offence that help keep them in games to win with a rookie on the line, Flucker was on a top offense all year.
Other than those above Joeckel was on the woeful Jags, Warmack was solid but really had no weapons so teams could bring the house, Pugh for the giants and that was just a dysfunctional team from start to finish, Watson was on the raiders filling in far a top guy and had difficulty filling those shoes.
Not to mention that this draft is expected to be head and shoulders better than lasts with strong depth at OL.
I could care less about PFF stats. I look at the fact that the bears Offence was very successful with 2 rookies, KC had a great year with a rookie on the line, Eagles had and explosive offence that help keep them in games to win with a rookie on the line, Flucker was on a top offense all year.
Other than those above Joeckel was on the woeful Jags, Warmack was solid but really had no weapons so teams could bring the house, Pugh for the giants and that was just a dysfunctional team from start to finish, Watson was on the raiders filling in far a top guy and had difficulty filling those shoes.
Not to mention that this draft is expected to be head and shoulders better than lasts with strong depth at OL.