like i said it's either system based like kellys o or it's the teams trust the qbs the most...and they get rewarded with high end play at the position as a result...presnap reads sound decision making with the football etc...
i don't endorse many qbs to run that style offense cause it exposes bad presnap read qbs and guys that make poor decisions with the football...but that's not the kind of qb we have...his decision making and presnap reads are a strength run an offense that maximizes that advantage for you and also helps hide some of your weaknesses ie oline pass pro and run blocking
no brainer for us imo
hoops, I tend to go the opposite direction with Tannehill. I think he has the intelligence to run the system you suggest, but I'd worry that he's putting too much pressure on his analytic processing - at the expense of his instincts. I'd be doing everything in my power to simplify the game for him (in the short term). The biggest issue with Tannehill (in my opinion) is that he's not an instinctual player. He's smart, and he's a great physical talent, but he needs to develop his instincts. I think the coaches would help him to simplify the game (as Seattle and SF have done with Wilson and Kaepernick - and what the Eagles did with Foles). If we are running a hurry up offense (which seems like a good idea, because our D can match that tempo - deep except for S and LB), I'd love to see it look like Philly's. Nick Foles didn't have a lot of difficult decisions to make. As Tannehill develops his instincts, I think you can gradually feed him more responsibilities. But for this kind of offense to work, the running game has to be very good. Kelly, Meyer, and Malzahn do it as well as anyone, and they all feature the run game.