Nice job laying out all these stats. Mike Wallace in particular must have been missing Tannehill last year.
Hartline should have signed with NE.
Hartline should have signed with NE.
Players WITH & WITHOUT Tannehill
- Thread starter SkapePhin
- Start date
gfish24
Rookie
Great Post!! Cheers!!
Jennings was old and washed up. That's why GB let him go.
Stills and Cameron have the dropsies. Stills was a complimentary piece in NO with an established QB and coach.
Wallace was a one trick pony running go routes. Have you heard of Antonio brown? There's a reason Wallace was let go and brown signed.
The long and short of it, the talent evaluation was the problem. I think Richard Matthews was a better player to keep over stills based on size and toughness, especially if Parker would get on the field.
I'm not saying tannehill is the answer yet but out horrible coaching, horrible o line play, poor personnel choices and stupid predictable play calling has been the real issue.
The panthers one was tough, the jets one shows his limitations
Wallace is a slightly better WR that Ted ginn who was another horrible front office choice.
---------- Post added at 11:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:12 PM ----------
Oh and I forgot hartline! A horrible overrated player that catches footballs with his chest? He's crap.
Wallace is a slightly better WR that Ted ginn who was another horrible front office choice.
---------- Post added at 11:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:12 PM ----------
Oh and I forgot hartline! A horrible overrated player that catches footballs with his chest? He's crap.
4th And Drunk
Active Roster
:sidelol:
Cameron was most definitely NOT top notch tight end before coming here. He had one good year and three very mediocre years. He's a one year wonder
2013 Miami Dolphins 16 15 69 759 11.0 67 6
So his two most productive seasons in Miami are more productive than his time in Buffalo so far.
Quit making **** up
Just for the sake of accuracy, Pittsburgh did not let Wallace go. They offered him a slightly larger contract than they offered Brown, and Wallace turned it down. Keep in mind that this was before Brown was considered a top-10 WR, let alone the best in the league.
This is like saying "NYjunc posted the same before and after he had a complete break with reality."
Phinatic8u
Club Member
Pittsburgh knew what they were doing.
Without Big Ben, Wallace never would've became a good WR.
I applaud the OP for doing the research hence the thumbs up. But I also agree that most of the guys stunk and were backup players at best who started for us because Ireland and Philbin ****ed up the roster - and that's why the stats went down for some guys. Cause they stink. Wallace will have a nice year w Flacco who is a better QB than people give him credit for.
He's no A. Brown or OBJ, and he's dependent upon a QB that can sync up with his irregular routes. We'll see if Flacco can do that. Pittsburgh obviously lucked out when Wallace turned down a larger contract than they offered Brown, but people should get their facts straight. This thread is six pages long, and no one noticed/corrected that innacuracy.
How bad were our receivers that Hartline, Bess and Gibson are all out of football. Another factor here is two of those guys went to Cleveland where they had high school QBs throwing the ball...
Flacco is the type of QB that Wallace needs. Wallace only thrived with Big Ben and maybe Flacco. I will ignore any portion of an evaluation for RT that pertains to Wallace. The information is just not useful. There are plenty of ex-Dolphins without including Wallace.