ckparrothead
Premium Member
I would rather have Rivers too. He's the future for this team. He is the real deal, not a system QB. A system QB doesn't rack up a 9.3 yard per attempt on 4400 yards in the defense-tough ACC.
Originally posted by gunsnroses
I would be extremely happy if we could trade Ogunleye for Patrick Ramsey and Taylor Jacobs. Both are young and Jacobs was a projected 1st-2nd rounder last year. So then we could have a starting QB with a number 2/3 receiver.
Originally posted by nick19991
Ramsey is going to get killed in Miami with our o-line, but Rivers a (great passer in the pocket) can also move around easier then Ramsey can
Keep in mind that Ramsey was under a system where no QB could do well in
Originally posted by ckparrothead
Thats a pretty bold statement. I'm as forgiving to Ramsey for putting up with Spurrier's offense as anyone, but I doubt that "no QB" could perform well in that system with that kind of talent in the WR corp and a tackle tandem like Jansen and Samuels.
BTW be careful when you toss around the word "proven" about Ramsey. All he's really proven so far is that he can take a bunch of sacks and not turn in any pro bowl performances. We could forgive him for that cuz of circumstances, but that doesn't mean he's PROVEN anything other than he has a lot of talent that hasn't been balled up into a consistent talent, and that a football guru like Joe Gibbs doesn't trust him to lead his football team. Again I love Ramsey too but lets be fair here.
because he has shown he can be great in the league
Originally posted by gunsnroses
I would be extremely happy if we could trade Ogunleye for Patrick Ramsey and Taylor Jacobs. Both are young and Jacobs was a projected 1st-2nd rounder last year. So then we could have a starting QB with a number 2/3 receiver.
Originally posted by ckparrothead
Its a pretty valid concern SMadison29. Ramsey is known for holding onto the ball too long, was known for that in college and is known for it in the NFL. Put him behind a shoddy OL like ours, and OUCH. Rivers has never been known as a guy that gets sacked a lot though.
Still I think this talk of Rivers leading us in his first year is kinda not realistic. I'm all for it if our choices are between him and Fiedler (or Griese) because I'd rather get the rookie some experience if all things are equal, and with Fiedler at the helm we have a snowballs chance in he|| of doing anything meaningfull for the season except assuring ourselves the #17 through #23 position in the draft order.
Originally posted by ckparrothead
I really don't think Ramsey has shown that. Again he's shown some of his assets, but he's also shown some of his weaknesses. When a guy struggles in a bad offense even if they show flashes of talent like he has, you can't say he's PROVEN or actually shown that he can be great. You don't say that til he packages everything together, which to this point Ramsey has not done.
I would rather have Rivers than Ramsey. Rivers is a better prospect for the future IMO than Ramsey. Just harping on what Ramsey has or has not proven that Rivers has not is kind of not a complete argument...because by that logic, Eli Manning hasn't PROVEN anything yet. Neither has Ben Roethlisberger.
Yet if you asked 32 GMs if they had a top pick in the draft, a need at QB, and the ability to either draft Manning or trade for Ramsey, I'd be willing to bet that like 31 of 32 say Manning (there's always one odd ball).
Would San Diego, who needs a QB, trade the #1 pick for Ramsey? Very very very doubtful...
Originally posted by ckparrothead
Yes we can. We can do a sign and trade. Been done before, can easily do it again.