Re: If you're refering to the OG situation
Not to be rude, but what is your point? You started off as though OG hasn't been much of a factor but say it was a good decision? They were hoping for a little more spark in the passing game......haven't seen that yet....a couple 3rd down catches don't qualify.
OG, and Thompson need to go next year, and possibly McKnight as well.....he's extremely fast but there's a reason he's our #3 and Dallas and other teams got rid of him (not trying to bash him but the #2 and #3 receiver positions should be upgraded IMO).
Not to be rude, but what is your point? You started off as though OG hasn't been much of a factor but say it was a good decision? They were hoping for a little more spark in the passing game......haven't seen that yet....a couple 3rd down catches don't qualify.
OG, and Thompson need to go next year, and possibly McKnight as well.....he's extremely fast but there's a reason he's our #3 and Dallas and other teams got rid of him (not trying to bash him but the #2 and #3 receiver positions should be upgraded IMO).
Originally posted by rhadaddy
Then I think you're off... OG came back and made a few plays for us on third down but hasn't been much of a factor and furthermore we ended up signing him in preseason for him to show up out of shape and ultimately getting hurt. I think RS/Wanny made a great call on the OG situation.