DrAstroZoom
Bon vivant
:goof: always works for (applies to) me!
Originally posted by Mindwarp
another linky
Sage, Ray and a rookie???.....Fiedler, Ray, and rookie???......FA, Ray/ Sage???....Fiedler, Sage, Ray???....no RR in the mix???Ray would be a minimum-salary player, so he would be cap friendly for any team signing him, even with a decent bonus. That could be attractive, but not nearly as attractive as a productive passer who has shown to be accurate.
Originally posted by inFINSible
Sage, Ray and a rookie???.....Fiedler, Ray, and rookie???......FA, Ray/ Sage???....Fiedler, Sage, Ray???....no RR in the mix???
What's best case scenario here?
Navy, I almost put that choice up there but, that scenario kinda scares the crap out of me.....I guess it would be more palatable if Norv does leave....Then I wouldn't worry about having a roster with zero QBs having experience in NT's offense...Originally posted by NavyFishFan
I'm not sure where he'd fit if we brought him in. Sounz like he's solid enough of a prospect. Hell if he's THAT good why not FA/Ray/Rook....
Originally posted by inFINSible
Navy, I almost put that choice up there but, that scenario kinda scares the crap out of me.....I guess it would be more palatable if Norv does leave....Then I wouldn't worry about having a roster with zero QBs having experience in NT's offense...
....my bad.Originally posted by NavyFishFan
Ya its bold and risky....but I said, "if he's THAT good."
I don't pretend to be a QB judge more than anybody else, so I'm glad I won't be making the decision as to what they go with this off-season.
Originally posted by NavyFishFan
Ya its bold and risky....but I said, "if he's THAT good."
I don't pretend to be a QB judge more than anybody else, so I'm glad I won't be making the decision as to what they go with this off-season.