...dude is a total Weeble!
His personal fight song! "Weebles wobble but they don't fall down!"
Enjoy with your fav beverage!
His personal fight song! "Weebles wobble but they don't fall down!"
Enjoy with your fav beverage!
Doesn't take much!This one will excite you!
Great breakdown. Washington is my favorite pick of this draft and I do believe he will be a contributor as WR 3 in the slot. How soon he impacts may be dependent on if we sign a vet for that role.
Washington reminds me of Bess with his route running and is similar to Landry with his ball carry skills and hard running, he will break tackles. Malik Washington has amazing hands and plays smart.
5'9, 192 pounds
4.4 40 yard time
This one will excite you!
Statistically, sub 6'0" WRs are as successful on fades as 6'3" or larger WRs. The assumption that big WRs are better at fades is incorrect. 6'0"-6'2" is the sweet spot statistically, but I suspect it's not really the height that's the difference.But bro, we had that. It didnt work.
And again, McDaniel loves the fade. Cant throw the fade to midgets.
Seems like a fun player but you guys are putting a lot on a 6th rd pick thinking he’s gonna come in and ball out right away. Maybe I’ll be wrong but realistically that doesn’t happen super often especially with a bit of an undersized player.
Statistically, sub 6'0" WRs are as successful on fades as 6'3" or larger WRs. The assumption that big WRs are better at fades is incorrect. 6'0"-6'2" is the sweet spot statistically, but I suspect it's not really the height that's the difference.
He is small, old, and not particularly fast (especially given his size). For that reason, he’s not a very exciting pick early in the draft. He never should have fallen to the sixth round, though.Ok so… why did this guy go SO late? I haven’t heard a single negative about him.
What’s his comp? Like Steve Smith?
thats the question im posing, are you sure you want that red zone target, bigger, perhaps slower, less separation, aka mike gesicki taking up a roster spot on the receiving unit in this offense?Red zone target doesn’t just mean throwing fades
He is small, old, and not particularly fast (especially given his size). For that reason, he’s not a very exciting pick early in the draft. He never should have fallen to the sixth round, though.
Steve Smith is a good comp for a best case scenario.
I’ve heard Shepherd and agree. Tate is actually a great one. Hadn’t seen that elsewhere.I think the best comps for Washington are Golden Tate and Sterling Shepherd.
He is small, old, and not particularly fast (especially given his size). For that reason, he’s not a very exciting pick early in the draft. He never should have fallen to the sixth round, though.
Steve Smith is a good comp for a best case scenario.
I think the best comps for Washington are Golden Tate and Sterling Shepherd.
I thought I read here he was fast… okay, so he’s twitchy with good route running and wiggle but he’s slow-ish… which makes the Landry/bess comparisons make more sense… and Tate.I’ve heard Shepherd and agree. Tate is actually a great one. Hadn’t seen that elsewhere.
He’s fast relative to the planet. But for a 5’8 receiver, he’s not fast — he ran a 4.47. The other guy is even slower. That’s why they both dropped.I thought I read here he was fast… okay, so he’s twitchy with good route running and wiggle but he’s slow-ish… which makes the Landry/bess comparisons make more sense… and Tate.
Is it the other guy who is fast?