Santa Clara police may stop working 49ers games over Kaepernick | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Santa Clara police may stop working 49ers games over Kaepernick

I'll add one thing to this. On 9/11, it was police officers (and other first responders) that were running in the direction of the towers while civilians were running away. In Dallas this year, police officers ran in the direction of the shots while the BLM protesters ran in the opposite direction. So, again, yes, I do put law enforcement officers a a higher level because we ask more of them.

One final (maybe) comment. It was 9/11 that forever changed my attitude about the police. Before that day I guess I took them for granted. I'm proud to say that 15 years later I still feel compelled to thank police officers when I interact with them. I am teaching my sons to think the same way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Measured in terms of the population committing violent crime (rather than the general population), African Americans are killed at a lower rate.

I didn't see where you posted the link to your quotes, but I believe they're based on the Harvard study, which is flawed:

Perhaps the biggest problem with the study, however, is that it only looks at potential biases after police have initiated an encounter. So the study found that police aren’t more likely to shoot an unarmed black suspect over a white one once the suspect was stopped — but it didn’t look at whether an unarmed black suspect is more likely to be stopped in the first place.

That’s a big deal: It’s possible that racial disparities in police shootings are driven by how often police stop black people. We know, for instance, that black Americans are disproportionately likely to be pulled over in traffic stops. If police are really equally likely to shoot anyone, regardless of race, in traffic stops, then it would make sense that the people who are pulled over more end up getting shot more often.

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/11/12148452/police-shootings-racism-study
 
The Black Lives Matter movement has been feted repeatedly at the White House and honored at the Democratic National Convention. Hillary Clinton has incorporated its claims about racist, homicidal cops into her presidential campaign pitch.

This summer’s assassinations of police officers haven’t slowed the anti-cop demonstrations or diminished the virulent hatred directed at cops during those protests.

San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick refuses to stand for the national anthem to protest the alleged oppression of blacks, while pop singer Beyoncé has made the Black Lives Matter movement the focal point of her performances.

Yet the Black Lives Matter movement is based on a lie. The idea that the United States is experiencing an epidemic of racially driven police shootings is false — and dangerously so.

The facts are these: Last year, the police shot 990 people, the vast majority armed or violently resisting arrest, according to the Washington Post’s database of fatal police shootings. Whites made up 49.9 percent of those victims, blacks 26 percent. That proportion of black victims is lower than what the black violent crime rate would predict.

Blacks constituted 62 percent of all robbery defendants in America’s 75 largest counties in 2009, 57 percent of all murder defendants and 45 percent of all assault defendants, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, even though blacks comprise only 15 percent of the population in those counties.

In New York City, where blacks make up 23 percent of the city’s population, blacks commit three-quarters of all shootings and 70 percent of all robberies, according to victims and witnesses in their reports to the NYPD. Whites, by contrast, commit less than 2 percent of all shootings and 4 percent of all robberies, though they are nearly 34 percent of the city’s population.

In Chicago, 80 percent of all known murder suspects in 2015 were black, as were 80 percent of all known nonfatal shooting suspects, though they’re a little less than a third of the population. Whites made up 0.9 percent of known murder suspects in Chicago in 2015 and 1.4 percent of known nonfatal shooting suspects, though they are about a third of the city’s residents.

Gang shootings occur almost exclusively in minority areas. Police use of force is most likely in confrontations with violent and resisting criminals, and those confrontations happen disproportionately in minority communities.

http://nypost.com/2016/09/06/the-lies-told-by-the-black-lives-matter-movement/
 
I didn't see where you posted the link to your quotes, but I believe they're based on the Harvard study, which is flawed:

The text you quoted makes no sense.

If police are really equally likely to shoot anyone, regardless of race, in traffic stops, then it would make sense that the people who are pulled over more end up getting shot more often.

We know, for instance, that black Americans are disproportionately likely to be pulled over in traffic stops.

So, black Americans are shot more often, right?

he study found that police aren’t more likely to shoot an unarmed black suspect

WTF?

Ultimately the author goes back to using general population % as the basis for a disparately. IMO ** total hypothetical here **, that is like claiming racism in prisons because Black inmates are victims of 37% of violent altercations but only make up 13% of the general population (while being 37% of the inmate population).
 
I didn't see where you posted the link to your quotes, but I believe they're based on the Harvard study, which is flawed:



http://www.vox.com/2016/7/11/12148452/police-shootings-racism-study

One more for the traffic stops:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2002/mar/22/20020322-041229-2114r/

The Justice Department has blocked the release of a study of suspected racial profiling after the survey concluded that black drivers speed more often than others.
The department had asked New Jersey officials to determine whether black speeders were being stopped more often as part of a racial-profiling investigation but has put the scheduled January release on hold, questioning how researchers reached their conclusions.

So, the Justice Department assumes racial bias. When the study finds none, they block the study......... hmmm......
 
The text you quoted makes no sense.





So, black Americans are shot more often, right?



WTF?

Ultimately the author goes back to using general population % as the basis for a disparately. IMO ** total hypothetical here **, that is like claiming racism in prisons because Black inmates are victims of 37% of violent altercations but only make up 13% of the general population (while being 37% of the inmate population).

It makes perfect sense. Please try reading it again.
 
Time for a commercial break:

[video=youtube;7P9ojqr8Tv4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P9ojqr8Tv4[/video]
 
It makes perfect sense. Please try reading it again.

There aren't racial disparities in police shootings. He is speculating on a racial cause for a disparity that doesn't exist.

Using general population as the basis makes no sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There aren't racial disparities in police shootings. He is speculating on a racial cause for a disparity that doesn't exist.

Using general population as the basis makes no sense.

We're still talking about the quoted section, right? In summary, it says that police bother more black people (racial profiling), which is racist and explains the 3 to 1 rate they are killed by police and the 8 to 1 rate they are killed by police when unarmed. At the moment of crisis, the officers do not differentiate between black and white (the author agrees with the study), but the actions leading up to the incident are - on a large scale - racist. If you care to learn, this has its roots in convict leasing/the new slavery. At this point, the issue is way bigger than the local sheriff selling of prisoners as slaves (in most places). So, the police don't have as much say as most seem to think. Still, they are complicit.

We should also note that the Harvard study you're referencing highlights that police are racist in non-lethal interaction with black people, which would strengthen the author's point.

Much more troubling, due to their frequency and potential impact on minority belief formation, is the possibility that racial differences in police use of non-lethal force have spillovers on myriad dimensions of racial inequality. If, for instance, blacks use their lived experience with police as evidence that the world is discriminatory, then it is easy to understand why black youth invest less in human capital or black adults are more likely to believe discrimination is an important determinant of economic outcomes. Black Dignity Matters.

This is well documented, and it's the root of the problem. Police **** with black people way more than they **** with white people. The prison rates also prove this. This is what we mean by systematic racism. Go look up the prison rate for black people in the prison capital of the world. If you want more examples of systematic racism, I could also pull up the FBI reports of Ferguson and Baltimore. Your idea of a few rogue, racist cops has no basis in reality. The problem is systematic, and the cops are being used as scapegoats to some extent, but they're willing participants and defenders of their actions, so, again, they deserve every bit of hate they get.

A top Bronx cop was caught on tape telling an NYPD whistleblower to specifically target “male blacks 14 to 21” for stop-and-frisk because they commit crimes.

Stop “the right people, the right time, the right location,” Deputy Inspector Christopher McCormack is heard saying on the recording.

“He meant blacks and Hispanics,” Officer Pedro Serrano, who made the secret recording, testified Thursday in Manhattan federal court.

“So what am I supposed to do: Stop every black and Hispanic?” Serrano was heard saying on the tape, which was recorded last month at the 40th Precinct in the Bronx.

McCormack said to focus on the Mott Haven section, where the problem “was robberies and grand larcenies.”

“I have no problem telling you this,” the inspector said on the tape. “Male blacks. And I told you at roll call, and I have no problem [to] tell you this, male blacks 14 to 21.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...nd-frisk-young-blacks-males-article-1.1295665

In Greensboro, which is 41 percent black, traffic stops help feed the stream of minor charges that draw a mostly African-American crowd of defendants to the county courthouse on weekday mornings. National surveys show that blacks and whites use marijuana at virtually the same rate, but black residents here are charged with the sole offense of possession of minor amounts of marijuana five times as often as white residents are.

And more than four times as many blacks as whites are arrested on the sole charge of resisting, obstructing or delaying an officer, an offense so borderline that some North Carolina police chiefs discourage its use unless more serious crimes are also involved.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/us/racial-disparity-traffic-stops-driving-black.html
 
We're still talking about the quoted section, right? In summary, it says that police bother more black people (racial profiling), which is racist and explains the 3 to 1 rate they are killed by police and the 8 to 1 rate they are killed by police when unarmed. At the moment of crisis, the officers do not differentiate between black and white (the author agrees with the study), but the actions leading up to the incident are - on a large scale - racist. If you care to learn, this has its roots in convict leasing/the new slavery. At this point, the issue is way bigger than the local sheriff selling of prisoners as slaves (in most places). So, the police don't have as much say as most seem to think. Still, they are complicit.

We should also note that the Harvard study you're referencing highlights that police are racist in non-lethal interaction with black people, which would strengthen the author's point.



This is well documented, and it's the root of the problem. Police **** with black people way more than they **** with white people. The prison rates also prove this. This is what we mean by systematic racism. Go look up the prison rate for black people in the prison capital of the world. If you want more examples of systematic racism, I could also pull up the FBI reports of Ferguson and Baltimore. Your idea of a few rogue, racist cops has no basis in reality. The problem is systematic, and the cops are being used as scapegoats to some extent, but they're willing participants and defenders of their actions, so, again, they deserve every bit of hate they get.



http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...nd-frisk-young-blacks-males-article-1.1295665



http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/us/racial-disparity-traffic-stops-driving-black.html

http://www.city-journal.org/html/myth-racial-profiling-12022.html
 

From one of your links (I can't believe you are going to communists for support):

But what about the heart of Mac Donald’s argument that “It is not racism that puts black men in jail, it’s their own behavior.”

The argument here is basically: There is high crime among Black people so the problem is the Black criminals who are committing this crime. This circular argument doesn’t explain or shed light on anything! It begs the question: WHY is crime so high among Black people? WHY are so many Black youth involved in crime? Mac Donald wants to start in the middle of the story. She refuses to look at the whole history of how and why things got to this point to begin with. She only looks at the effects and symptoms, not the reasons and causes.

It’s not that there are all these Black youth who are somehow “naturally” attracted to a life of crime and violence. We’re not talking about a community with HIGH rates of employment that are involved in criminal activity. No, there are huge economic and social factors that have made such a “choice”—which is really hardly a choice at all—the rational way to try and survive.

I agree 100%, but that has NOTHING to do with a racist criminal justice system. There is a system that is horribly broken. It is the welfare system and the politicians on both sides of the isle that refuse to fix it.

I cannot support the final conclusions of the authors of that article:

In a socialist society, under the dictatorship of the proletariat, the masses of people will be fully involved in figuring out and working through in an all-round way, how to revolutionize every aspect of society. All the exploitative and degrading economic and social relations and ideas under capitalism—including everything that produces “Black on Black crime”—will be dug up, struggled against and gotten rid of. And it is in this process of emancipating all of humanity—that the masses of people will be able to revolutionize and transform the world and themselves. This is a society and a life worth living and dying for. That is the “positive” answer to this horrendous thing of “Black on Black crime.”

Really? A socialist society is the answer?

Regarding the article in the Atlantic, why is this never mentioned?

Here’s what the data shows about the racial makeup of Baltimore’s finest:

* Of the 2,745 active duty police officers in the department — 1,445 — more than half are African-American, Hispanic, Asian or Native American, according to data provided by the Baltimore police department to The Daily Caller News Foundation.

* Four of its top six commanders are either African-American or Hispanic.

* More than 60 percent of the incumbents at the highest command levels hail from minority communities.

* Among the 46 Baltimore police officers who hold the rank of captain and above, 25 are from ethnic or racial minority groups. That constitutes 54 percent of the command leadership.

In other words, Baltimore is a black-majority city led by a police force whose officers are mostly racial minorities as well.

I'll tell you why, because it ruins the narrative that RACISM is the primary cause. I don't disagree that there are problems in law enforcement. I just disagree that racism is highest among them. I think a disconnect has grown between the police and the people they are hired to protect and serve. I think there are many causes of that:

1. Less community policing.
2. More proactive policing techniques (like stop and frisk, etc) leading to more interactions.
3. High crime rates in poor neighborhoods.
4. The near complete breakdown in families in poor communities and the resulting loss of discipline and respect for authority other than the authority of violence. Do you honestly think that it is only police officers that are not respected? What about teachers? Schools are a mess in poor communities. Are teachers committing brutalities on students too?

None of that is directly a matter of race, other than the fact that a disproportionate number of African Americans are poor. That is the thing that is largely ignored in these debates and goes on unsolved.
 
From one of your links (I can't believe you are going to communists for support):





I agree 100%, but that has NOTHING to do with a racist criminal justice system. There is a system that is horribly broken. It is the welfare system and the politicians on both sides of the isle that refuse to fix it.

I cannot support the final conclusions of the authors of that article:



Really? A socialist society is the answer?

Regarding the article in the Atlantic, why is this never mentioned?



I'll tell you why, because it ruins the narrative that RACISM is the primary cause. I don't disagree that there are problems in law enforcement. I just disagree that racism is highest among them. I think a disconnect has grown between the police and the people they are hired to protect and serve. I think there are many causes of that:

1. Less community policing.
2. More proactive policing techniques (like stop and frisk, etc) leading to more interactions.
3. High crime rates in poor neighborhoods.
4. The near complete breakdown in families in poor communities and the resulting loss of discipline and respect for authority other than the authority of violence. Do you honestly think that it is only police officers that are not respected? What about teachers? Schools are a mess in poor communities. Are teachers committing brutalities on students too?

None of that is directly a matter of race, other than the fact that a disproportionate number of African Americans are poor. That is the thing that is largely ignored in these debates and goes on unsolved.

I appreciate the questions you're raising, and I'll do my best to respond tonight.

Later than expected, but I did want to address your points.

If a "White" system is creating environments that segregate and target black people, it does not matter what color the foot soldiers are. As I said before, police are scapegoats to a large extent. The marching orders come from higher, but police have proven, largely, to be willing participants and apologists for the war on drugs (which the police apologist you linked defends) and stop and frisks. That's my major beef with them. They also protect their own when they should not. Also, it's been proven that black people do the same or less drugs than white people (in one of the links in the above post) but are arrested for drugs at a much higher rate and prosecuted for similar crimes much more harshly. Again, not all of this is police, but they play a crucial role in this chain of injustice. I've posted many articles of police doing amazing things in communities. These people are godsends to their communities, and they address many of the points you raise. In poor communities that don't have the benefit of these excellent exceptions, we see families destroyed by harsh sentences for petty crime. We see job markets turn away people with records, and, at this point, we see people enter the trap. Corporate prisons make up a $4B industry - in the neighborhood of NCAA Football. Needless to say, they have lobbyists that affect general laws. This, of course, is also bad for taxpayers.

1. Agree with you here 100%.
2. Again, agree
3. Agree, but, as I note above, the police have a role in that
4. You have to ask why poor communities are such a mess. Is it the fault of the people? Do the lowest of the low sink to the bottom and live in ghettos together? Groups of people over large ranges will be similar, and their starting place and opportunities for social mobility will be the deciding factors (on a group level, I stress). There are good and bad people and smart and stupid people of every language, color, and class. Of industrialized nations, the USA rates among the worst in social mobility. Most people are average. It goes without saying, but people seem to miss this point. The way things are set up, and average person born rich will stay rich, and an average person born poor will stay poor. There can be debate about how fair this is, but if we settle on this model, shouldn't we at least make sure that the standard of living for poor people is much higher than it currently is? If you set up the game to make it so people have exceptionally difficult time climbing social rungs (even one), shouldn't we have a system that doesn't also steal from them (civil forfeiture - police steal more than burglars)? Shouldn't we have a system that doesn't enslave them? There's a reason people don't want to allow these groups to succeed. They're worth more to them as slaves than nice, middle class couples. It should be noted that despite this state violence against them, black fathers live with their children at a high rate. Again, police are not immune from critique here.

“An important but unreported indicator of Ferguson’s dilemma is that half of young African-American men are missing from the community. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, while there are 1,182 African-American women between the ages of 25 and 34 living in Ferguson, there are only 577 African-American men in this age group. In other words there are more than two young black women for each young black man in Ferguson.”

In April, The New York Times extended this line of reporting, pointing out that nationally, there are 1.5 million missing black men. As the paper put it: “Incarceration and early deaths are the overwhelming drivers of the gap. Of the 1.5 million missing black men from 25 to 54 — which demographers call the prime-age years — higher imprisonment rates account for almost 600,000. Almost one in 12 black men in this age group are behind bars, compared with one in 60 nonblack men in the age group, one in 200 black women and one in 500 nonblack women.” For context, there are about eight million African-American men in that age group overall.

I think you recognize many of the bigger issues that black people face, and I applaud you for that. We agree on many points, and with better work on your points 1 and 2, I think we can see some real change. I'm not going to find it now, but I also think police work way too much. I think they should make more and work fewer hours. While we have to hold people accountable for egregious mistakes, it's best to do everything possible to avoid those mistakes. I used to work as a night manager at a gas station, and some of the night shift cops would come in for a break, telling me that they're on their 14th hour of a double. This should not be legal - for their safety and for the safety of the people they deal with. It's an important job, and it needs to compensated as such. With that, though, we should expect better. We have official reports from Ferguson and Baltimore citing institutional racism within the force. This can't be allowed to continue. End corporate prisons and ticket and prison quotas. The police shouldn't be tax collectors. This pits the public against them, as it should - frankly. Policies that force police to **** with people (for lack of a better term) disproportionately impact poor communities; and within those poor communities, black people tend to get it the worst (there will be regional differences here).

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/08/o...lack-dads-are-doing-the-best-of-all.html?_r=0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Later than expected, but I did want to address your points.

If a "White" system is creating environments that segregate and target black people, it does not matter what color the foot soldiers are. As I said before, police are scapegoats to a large extent. The marching orders come from higher, but police have proven, largely, to be willing participants and apologists for the war on drugs (which the police apologist you linked defends) and stop and frisks. That's my major beef with them. They also protect their own when they should not. Also, it's been proven that black people do the same or less drugs than white people (in one of the links in the above post) but are arrested for drugs at a much higher rate and prosecuted for similar crimes much more harshly. Again, not all of this is police, but they play a crucial role in this chain of injustice. I've posted many articles of police doing amazing things in communities. These people are godsends to their communities, and they address many of the points you raise. In poor communities that don't have the benefit of these excellent exceptions, we see families destroyed by harsh sentences for petty crime. We see job markets turn away people with records, and, at this point, we see people enter the trap. Corporate prisons make up a $4B industry - in the neighborhood of NCAA Football. Needless to say, they have lobbyists that affect general laws. This, of course, is also bad for taxpayers.

It has not been proven that blacks to the same or less drugs than whites. I suspect the rate of drug use (both the amount and the type of drug) varies by socioeconomic status more than anything else. So why do blacks get arrested more? Could be lots of reasons. A totally logic one is:

Actually, it’s possible for blacks to be no more likely than whites to use drugs but still get arrested more often for using them, even by scrupulously race-neutral police. That’s because blacks commit so many other crimes. If a black is arrested for robbery–and blacks are about eight times more likely than whites to be arrested for robbery–the police search him for drugs. If they find drugs they charge him with possession in addition to robbery. If he hadn’t got caught for robbery–or assault or murder or whatever it was–he probably would not have gotten that drug charge.

1. Agree with you here 100%.
2. Again, agree
3. Agree, but, as I note above, the police have a role in that
4. You have to ask why poor communities are such a mess. Is it the fault of the people? Do the lowest of the low sink to the bottom and live in ghettos together? Groups of people over large ranges will be similar, and their starting place and opportunities for social mobility will be the deciding factors (on a group level, I stress). There are good and bad people and smart and stupid people of every language, color, and class. Of industrialized nations, the USA rates among the worst in social mobility. Most people are average. It goes without saying, but people seem to miss this point. The way things are set up, and average person born rich will stay rich, and an average person born poor will stay poor. There can be debate about how fair this is, but if we settle on this model, shouldn't we at least make sure that the standard of living for poor people is much higher than it currently is? If you set up the game to make it so people have exceptionally difficult time climbing social rungs (even one), shouldn't we have a system that doesn't also steal from them (civil forfeiture - police steal more than burglars)? Shouldn't we have a system that doesn't enslave them? There's a reason people don't want to allow these groups to succeed. They're worth more to them as slaves than nice, middle class couples. It should be noted that despite this state violence against them, black fathers live with their children at a high rate. Again, police are not immune from critique here.

Why are poor communities such a mess? In my cynical opinion, it is because the welfare system is broken and neither side of the political aisle is interested in fixing it. There are just too many obvious improvements that can be made for me to believe otherwise. Why not have a more graduated benefit reduction scale as someone begins to work? Why put people in a position when they have to lose money when they get a job? It makes no sense.
 
SUPPORT THE POLICE AND JOIN THE BOYCOTT OF THE NFL UNTILL THESE ANTI AMERICAN, RACIST ACTIVITIES CEASE AT THE GAMES AND STADIUMS!!

As a fan of the Miami Dophins, i had to sickenly watch on opening day five members of my team hang there commy, racist heads during the display of ALL AMERICANS FLAG AND ANTHEM on 9-11, a sacred day for every TRUE american.

The Seattle Seahawks, they were honorable and came out with coaches and players arm in arm, lock step in honor for the country, even helping unfurrel and hold flags. On our sideline, dirt bag, racist, communist (kappersmuck regularly wears clothes featuring communist slogans, the commy red hammer and sykle logo and images of famous communist figures like chi the butcher, the castro brothers, malcolm x, carl marx, etc...) kneeling and hanging their shamefull faces to the ground. The first time in my life since i became a finz fan in 1971i have rooted for the opposing team.

I HAVE JOINED AND SIGNED every nfl boycott of the nfl and petitions i can find. I turned the dolphin/seattle game off when i saw our players Kommy Bowing and wont be watching another dolphins or nfl game untill the nfl puts a stop to this activity. I sent a letter off to the finz owner and nfl telling them my issue and boycott of the team, its merchandice, all nfl logo, Hard Rock Stadium and all things nfl, miami dolphins and Hard Rock Stadium AND all sports packages like Directv.

Yacking and bitttching on the net wont do a thing. The owners and nfl dont care as long as their are butts in the seats at the stadium and merchandice and money are flowing. The only way to STOP THIS is to stop their money by Boycotting all things NFL. PICKETTING the stadium in your town, writing letters as i and many others are doing to the teams AND ESPECIALLY THE TEAM AND OFFENDING PLAYERS SPONSORS!!!

Fortunately, the scumbag players are losing endorsements. Hopefully, with more pressure, they will lose ALL endorsements. THIS IS NOT ABOUT the players "RIGHTS". This is about throwing ALL americans under the bus for their greivance. The American flag and the National Anthem represent EVERY AMERICAN and they are saying ALL of america is oppressive to black people. They kneel in a stadium at games where the americans of ALL colors have bought a ticket to not only see them play but also PAYS THERE AWFUL GUZILLION DOLLAR AN HOUR OPPRESSIVE SALARY'S!!!! Its a slap in the face to the fans and this kind of desplay should be labeled as CONDUCT DETRIMENTAL TO THE TEAM OR NFL and suspended without pay. Theres a time and place for everything. They can protest all they want on their own time and their own dime while NOT on the job. And really, before Kommy Kappersshmuk started all this, did ANYONE not know most blacks hate police and white people? They keep saying its about "awareness" but everyone has been "aware" of the black communities hate for police and caucasions. Its all about civil unrest, agitation, racism, and furthering the destruction of america. Nothing else.

BOYCOTT THE NFL. SIGN PETITIONS. SUPPORT THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY'S IN AMERICA. BOYCOTT THE STADIUMS WHERE SPORTS TEAMS ALLOW THEIR PLAYERS TO DISGRACE THE COUNTRY AND ITS CITIZENS WITH OPEN ACTS OF COMMUNISM AND RACISM.

Other wise, this will get WORSE!!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom