akfinfan
FinHeaven VIP
Many people are praising Munchak for refusing to fire his staff and some people are giving Philbin grief for not doing the same thing, but let's think about this. If Joe refuses to fire Sherman, what happens? Joe will be fired, and so will Sherman afterwards. So either way, Sherman is out of a job. If Sherman was such a good mentor for Joe, he should have stepped in and told Joe to go ahead and fire me or I would resign so he could continue as head coach.
This is no different than a manager at a business that has a good or best friend working for them. If that person isn't producing and a change needs to be made, then you make it. If not, you need to go too. What is the goal here? To be a successful organization and ultimately win a Super Bowl. Sherman wasn't good enough. I applaud Joe for doing the hard task, the right task, by firing his friend and subordinate. As a military leader, I do not see this happen often enough and it leads to turmoil and disfunction when a supervisor has a "friend" working for them and they don't hold them accountable. Joe is holding Sherman accountable and also sends a message to anyone else on the staff that if you don't produce, you might get canned too. People want to talk about Joe Philbin not being a "leader of men". This is exactly the kind of leader he needs to be, by holding people accountable. If Joe doesn't right this ship be making this change, then he will need to go too....