I got ya, they went straight, then they turned left, then straight, turned left, straight, left, crash, straight, left, crash, and then it ended.I couldn't watch the race but I wanted too.....oops....sorry...off topic.....
I got ya, they went straight, then they turned left, then straight, turned left, straight, left, crash, straight, left, crash, and then it ended.I couldn't watch the race but I wanted too.....oops....sorry...off topic.....
The most basic thing that should be asked or required is the following of the rules they're tasked to enforce.
There are other folks here who "take ****" and don't break the rules in response. Surely your philosophy can't be that the people running the forum, the ones who should be setting the best example of behavior, should be any different.
The problem with your OP is it assumes that every poster who originates a post does it with good intentions, which is not the case.
Show me an example of a moderator "breaking" the rules, I'll be waiting
Ironically, you can look through just about any thread here whose topic was originally the Miami Dolphins, and find in it exactly what I bolded above, with no moderation of that behavior, and with the moderators themselves being the culprits in many cases.Also this thread is about off topic responses but you posted a off topic thread, this fourm is for MIAMI dolphins opinions, news and other articles about the team. Not some post whining about other people. Just like certain posts don't belong in certain threads, certain threads don't belong in certain forums.
Ironically, you can look through just about any thread here whose topic was originally the Miami Dolphins, and find in it exactly what I bolded above, with no moderation of that behavior, and with the moderators themselves being the culprits in many cases.
So when a thread is started about the Miami Dolphins, posts within that thread that do nothing but refer to another poster in a negative way are okay?I'm not bringing up posts, i brought up threads, your allowed to attack post or ideals just not the actual poster..
and WHO exactly decides if a post is done with good intent or not?
I got ya, they went straight, then they turned left, then straight, turned left, straight, left, crash, straight, left, crash, and then it ended.
and WHO exactly decides if a post is done with good intent or not?
And "decide" all you'd like, in your own mind, but in this forum, unlike in conversations in person, that decision doesn't give one license to make negative references to individual posters. There are rules here that don't exist in in-person conversations.All of us, individually. It's the same thing we do regarding conversations we have in person.
and WHO exactly decides if a post is done with good intent or not?
to many people deem it bad intent if they dont share the opinion of the post.
its called MESSAGE BOARD DISEASE!!
And "decide" all you'd like, in your own mind, but in this forum, unlike in conversations in person, that decision doesn't give one license to make negative references to individual posters. There are rules here that don't exist in in-person conversations.